Skip to Main Content

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy
2016. Vol. 24, no. 2, 64–92
doi:10.17759/cpp.2016240205
ISSN: 2075-3470 / 2311-9446 (online)

Establishing Validity and Reliability of the Russian Version of The Iowa-Netherlands comparison orientation measure in student’s sample

4857

N.G. Garanyan, E.S. Pushkina

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

Social comparison is a valuable source of social cognition and personal quality informa- tion there is growing body of research on this topic in social and clinical psychology. So- cial psychologist’s studies demonstrate that social comparison orientation is an impor- tant individual trait. Special 11-item’s instrument The Iowa-Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure (INCOM) designed for its accurate assessment has been validated in American, Netherland and German samples. Russian version of INCOM has never been developed and validated in Russian samples. Aiming at the filling of this gap the task was installed in the project on social cognition research (grunt RSF №14-18-03461). Article presents the results of the instrument reliability and validity establishment among Russian students. Two series of factor analysis confirmed two-factor instrument struc- ture in the sample of 580 students. Acceptable scores of internal consistency and external validity of INCOM has been established along with its high test-retest reliability.

General Information

Keywords: social comparison orientation, sample of Russian students, factor struc- ture, validity, reliability

Journal rubric: Workshop and Methods

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2016240205

For citation: Garanyan N.G., Pushkina E.S. Establishing Validity and Reliability of the Russian Version of The Iowa-Netherlands comparison orientation measure in student’s sample. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2016. Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 64–92. DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2016240205. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Anastazi A. Psikhologicheskoe testirovanie. M.: Pedagogika, 1982. Pp. 122—237.
  2. Garanyan N.G. Perfektsionizm i vrazhdebnost’ kak lichnostnye faktory depres- sivnykh i trevozhnykh rasstroistv: diss. … dokt. psikhol. nauk. M., 2010.
  3. Garanyan N.G. Teoriya sotsial’nogo sravneniya v klinicheskoi psikhologii. Psikho- logicheskii zhurnal RAN. 2015. T. 36. № 4. Pp. 23—36.
  4. Garanyan N.G., Shchukin D.A. Chastye sotsial’nye sravneniya kak faktor emotsional’noi dezadaptatsii studentov. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhotera- piya. 2014. № 4. Pp. 182—206.
  5. Klain P. Spravochnoe rukovodstvo po konstruirovaniyu testov. Kiev: PAN Ltd, 1994. 283 p.
  6. Krasnova V.V. Sotsial’naya trevozhnost’ kak faktor narushenii interpersonal’nykh otnoshenii i trudnostei v uchebnoi deyatel’nosti u studentov. diss. ... kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2013. 209 p.
  7. Nasledov A.D. Matematicheskie metody psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya. SPb.: Rech’, 2004. 392 p.
  8. Samoilenko E.S. Problemy sravneniya v psikhologicheskom issledovanii. M.: izdatel’stvo «Institut psikhologii RAN», 2010.
  9. Tarabrina N.V. Praktikum po psikhologii posttravmaticheskogo stressa. SPb.: Piter, 2001. 268 p.
  10. Dijkstra P., Gibbons F., Buunk A. Social comparison theory / Social Psychological foundations of clinical psychology. Maddux J., Tangney J. (Eds.). 2010. New York. London: Guilford Press. Pp. 195—210.
  11. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations. 1954. V. 7. Pp. 117—140.
  12. Gibbons F., Buunk B. Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychol- ogy. 1999. V. 76. Рp. 129—142.
  13. Gilbert P., Price J., Allan S. Social comparison, social attractiveness, and evolution: Howmight they be related? New Ideas in Psychology. 1995. V. 13. № 2. Pp. 149—165.
  14. Krasnova H., Wenninger H., Widjaja T., Buxmann P. Envy on Facebook: A Hid- den Threat to Users’ Life Satisfaction? Research Paper, International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik / Leipzig, Germany: Business Information Systems, 2013.
  15. Krizan Z., Bushman B. Better than my loved ones: social comparison tendencies among narcissists. Personality and Individual Differences. 2011. V. 50. Pp. 212—216.
  16. Suls J., Wheeler L. A selective history of classic and neo-social comparison theory /
  17. J. Suls, L. Wheeler (Eds.) Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. 2000. Dordrecht. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. Pp. 1—23.
  18. Schneider S., Schupp J. The Social Comparison Scale, 2011 [web-document] https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.368747.de/diw_ sp0360.pdf

Information About the Authors

Natalia G. Garanyan, Doctor of Psychology, Professor of the Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Associate Professor, leading researcher at the Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, member of the editorial board of the journal "Consultative Psychology and Psychotherapy", Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1227-2682, e-mail: garanian@mail.ru

Elizabeth S. Pushkina, Student, Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Moscow city University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: liza.pushkina@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 3207
Previous month: 36
Current month: 18

Downloads

Total: 4857
Previous month: 20
Current month: 12