The Methodology of "Responsibility in Adolescents": Development and Description

5

Abstract

The article presents the results of the development and standardization of the author’s methodology “Responsibility in Adolescents”, aimed at studying the basic mechanisms of responsibility and the areas of its implementation in the everyday life of older adolescents aged 16-19 years. The study was carried out on a sample of 240 schoolchildren in grades 10-11 and college students 1-2 years old. The methodology includes 27 statements. Its standardization was carried out in accordance with the necessary requirements for testing validity and reliability. Based on the results of exploratory factor analysis, 6 scales were identified that reflect the main components of responsibility: “Support”, “Self-control”, “Conscience”, “Social responsibility”, “Care for the environment”, “Avoidance of responsibility”. The scales have good internal consistency. Checking the convergent validity when comparing the general indicator of responsibility and the indicator of internality of the “Methods for diagnosing the level of subjective control” showed a significant correlation. The good psychometric indicators of the methodology and its portability allow us to recommend it for both individual and group work with adolescents.

General Information

Keywords: responsibility; social responsibility; self-control; conscience; personality orientation; personality maturity; methodology development; reliability; validity

Journal rubric: Developmental Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2024160305

Received: 21.06.2024

Accepted:

For citation: Danilova E.E., Begunova L.A., Lisichkina A.G., Andreeva D.A. The Methodology of "Responsibility in Adolescents": Development and Description [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psychological-Educational Studies, 2024. Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 69–84. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2024160305. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Abul'khanova-Slavskaya K.A. Strategiya zhizni [Life Strategy]. Moscow: Mysl', 1991. 299 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Barsukova S.A. Kontseptual'noe pole fenomena “sovest'” v psikhologii [The conceptual field of the phenomenon “conscience" in psychology]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 2013. Vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 36–44. (In Russ.).
  3. Begunova L.A. Sravnitel'noe issledovanie fenomena internal'nosti u starsheklassnikov i uchashchikhsya organizatsii srednego professional'nogo obrazovaniya iz raznykh regionov Rossii [Comparative Study of the Phenomenon of Internality of High School Students and Younger Students Living in Different Regions]. Aktual'nye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya = Actual problems of psychological knowledge, 2022, no. 4, pp. 146–164. DOI:10.51944/20738544_2022_4_146. (In Russ.).
  4. Belovol E.V., Melkov S.V., Sakharova T.N. Osobennosti grazhdanskoi identichnosti rossiiskikh podrostkov (na primere otdykhayushchikh v mezhdunarodnom detskom tsentre «Artek») [Specificity of Russian Teenager’s Civic Identity (Case of Campers at the Artek International Children’s Centre)]. Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education, 2022. Vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 363–385. DOI:10.15507/1991-9468.107.026.202202.363-385 (In Russ.).
  5. Bozhovich L.I. Lichnost' i ee formirovanie v detskom vozraste [Personality and its formation in childhood]. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2008. 400 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Bokut' E.L., Komarova O.N., Rasskazova A.L., Reshetnikova O.V. Samootnoshenie i atributivnye skhemy lokus-kontrolya kak sostavlyayushchie lichnostnogo potentsiala [Self-cocept and locus of control attributes as components of personal potential]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika i psikhologiya = Herald of Tver State University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology, 2020. Vol. 4, no. 53, pp. 6–16. DOI:10.26456/vtpsyped/2020.4.006 (In Russ.).
  7. Brushlinskii A.V. K probleme sub"ekta v psikhologicheskoi nauke [To the problem of the subject in psychological science]. In Abulkhanova-Slavskaya K.A., Brushlinsky A.V. (eds.). Gumanisticheskie problemy psikhologicheskoi teorii [Humanistic problems of psychological theory]. Moscow: Nauka, 1995, pp. 5–14. (In Russ.).
  8. Buzgan E.I. Vzaimosvyaz' otvetstvennosti i samoaktualizatsii u sovremennoi molodezhi [The Relationship of Responsibility and Self-Actualization among Today’s Youth]. Eksperimental'naya psikhologiya = Experimental Psychology, 2023. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 75–87. DOI:10.17759/exppsy.2023160405 (In Russ.).
  9. Gretsov A.G., Azbel' A.A. Psikhologicheskie testy dlya starsheklassnikov i studentov [Psychological tests for high school students and students]. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2012. 208 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Znakov V.V. Ponimanie sub"ektom pravdy o moral'nom postupke drugogo cheloveka: normativnaya etika i psikhologiya nravstvennogo soznaniya [Understanding by the subject of the truth about the moral act of another person: normative ethics and psychology of moral consciousness]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 1993. Vol. 14, pp. 32–43.
  11. Il'in E.P. Psikhologiya sovesti: vina, styd, raskayanie [Psychology of conscience: guilt, shame, remorse]. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2016. 288 p. (In Russ.).
  12. Knyazev E.B., Kudasheva Z.E. Razlichiya v sotsial'no-psikhologicheskikh kharakteristikakh molodykh lyudei s raznym urovnem internal'nosti v oblasti dostizhenii [Differences in socio-psychological characteristics of young people with different levels of internality in achievement area] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological research, 2020. Vol. 13, no. 71, pp. 1–22. DOI:10.54359/ps.v13i71.190 (In Russ.).
  13. Maslou A. Religii, tsennosti i pik-perezhivaniya [Religious, Values and Peak-Experiences]. In Rybina E. (ed.), Po napravleniyu k psikhologii bytiya [Toward a Psychology of Being]. Moscow: Eksmo-Press, 2002, pp. 191–269. (In Russ.).
  14. Muzdybaev K. Psikhologiya otvetstvennosti [Psychology of responsibility]. In Semenov V.E. (ed.). Moscow: LIBROKOM, 2010. 248 p. (In Russ.).
  15. Olport G. Stanovlenie lichnosti: Izbrannye trudy [The formation of personality: Selected works]. Trubitsyna L.V., Leontiev D.A. Moscow: Smysl, 2002. 462 p. (In Russ.).
  16. Randzhan R. Teoreticheskii analiz zarubezhnykh kognitivnykh teorii lichnosti [Theoretical analysis of foreign cognitive personality theories]. Baikal Research Journal, 2021. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 11–22. DOI:10.17150/2411-6262.2021.12(1).22 (In Russ.).
  17. Rean A.A. Psikhologiya lichnosti: sotsializatsiya, povedenie, obshchenie [Personality psychology: socialization, behavior, communication]. Saint Petersburg: Praim-Evroznak; Moscow: AST, 2007. 407 p. (In Russ.).
  18. Sorokova M.G., Kardanova E.Yu., Radchikova N.P., Fedorov V.V. Rukovodstvo po standartizatsii psikhodiagnosticheskogo instrumentariya: trebovaniya i otsenka kachestva: uchebnoe posobie [Guidelines for standardization of psychodiagnostic tools: requirements and quality assessment]. In Sorokova M.G. (ed.). Moscow: FGBOU VO MGPPU, 2024. 48 p. (In Russ.).
  19. Spirkin A.G. Soznanie i samosoznanie [Consciousness and self-awareness]. Moscow, 1972. 303 p. (In Russ.).
  20. Strizhitskaya O.Yu. Vosprinimaemyi stress, lokus kontrolya i samoprinyatie: teoreticheskie i empiricheskii podkhody [Perceived stress, the locus of control and self-acceptance: theoretical and empirical approaches]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2019. Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 21–31. DOI:10.21638/11701/spbu16.2019.102 (In Russ.).
  21. Tolstykh N.N. Sovremennoe vzroslenie [Modern adulthood]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Consultative psychology and psychotherapy, 2015, no. 4, pp. 7–24. DOI:10.17759/cpp.2015230402 (In Russ.).
  22. Ushakov G.K. Ocherk ontogeneza urovnei soznaniya [An essay on the ontogenesis of levels of consciousness]. In Kulikov L.V. (ed.), Psikhologiya soznaniya [Psychology of consciousness]. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2001, pp. 302–315. (In Russ.).
  23. Fel'dshtein D.I. Sotsial'noe razvitie v prostranstve-vremeni detstva [Social development in the space-time of childhood]. Moscow: Mosk. psikhol.-sots. in-t: Flinta, 1997. 158 p. (In Russ.).
  24. Shadrikov V.D. Sovest': psikhologo-filosofskii analiz [Conscience: psychological and philosophical analysis]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 2018. Vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 5–14. (In Russ.).
  25. Caliendo M. et al. Locus of Control and Investment in Training. Journal of Human Resources, 2020. Vol. 57(4), pp. 0318–9377R2. DOI:10.3368/jhr.57.4.0318-9377R2
  26. Huebner E.S., Ash C., Laughlin J.E. Life Experiences, Locus of Control, and School Satisfaction in Adolescence. Social Indicators Research, 2001. Vol. 55(2), pp. 167– DOI:10.1023/A:1010939912548
  27. Johnson R.E., Rosen C.C., Chang C.-H., Lin S.H.J. Getting to the core of locus of control: Is it a core evaluation of the self or the environment? Journal of Applied Psychology, 2015. Vol. 100(5), pp. 1568–1578. DOI:10.1037/apl0000011
  28. Kang H.S., Chang K.E., Chen C., Greenberger E. Locus of Control and Peer Relationships Among Caucasian, Hispanic, Asian, and African American Adolescents. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 2015. Vol. 44(1), pp. 184–194. DOI:10.1007/s10964-013-0083-6
  29. Kohlberg L. Moral stages and moralization: the cognitive-developmental approach. In Lickona T. (ed.), Moral development and behavior: theory, research, and social issues. New-York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976, pp. 31–53.
  30. Piaget J. The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press Paperbacks, 1997. 410 p.
  31. Rotter J.B. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1966. Vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 1–28. DOI:10.1037/h0092976
  32. Turan M. The relationship between locus of control and hope in adolescents: The mediating role of career and talent development self-efficacy. Australian Journal of Career Development, 2021. Vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 129–138. DOI:10.1177/103841
  33. Ullah S., Yusheng K. Financial socialization, childhood experiences and financial well-being: the mediating role of locus of control. Frontiers Psychology, 2020. Vol. 11, pp. 2162. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02162
  34. Winter D.G., Barenbaum N.B. Responsibility and the power motive in women and men. Journal of Personality, 1985. Vol. 53(2), pp. 335–355. DOI:1111/J.1467-6494.1985.Tb00369.X
  35. Ziegler M. Psychological Test Adaptation and Development – How Papers Are Structured and Why. Psychological Test Adaptation and Development, 2020. Vol. 1(1), pp. 1–9. DOI:10.1027/2698-1866/a00000

Information About the Authors

Elena E. Danilova, PhD in Psychology, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of the Scientific Foundations of Applied Child Psychology, FGBNU "Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education", Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5209-3665, e-mail: danillen@yandex.ru

Lyudmila A. Begunova, PhD in Law, Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of the Scientific Foundations of Applied Child Psychology, Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9704-7096, e-mail: lab6510@list.ru

Alena G. Lisichkina, Researcher of the Laboratory of the Scientific Foundations of Applied Child Psychology, Federal Scientific Center of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research , Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5411-2396, e-mail: al1975@spartak.ru

Daria A. Andreeva, Junior Researcher of the Laboratory Psychology of Giftedness, Federal Scientific Center of Psychological and Multidisciplinary Research, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8806-1112, e-mail: dolly-06@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 14
Previous month: 0
Current month: 14

Downloads

Total: 5
Previous month: 0
Current month: 5