Psychotherapy as a method of humanitarian cognition in the light of the methodology of L.S. Vygotsky

In the article the author attempts to make a methodological interpretation of psychotherapy as a method of humanitarian cognition, which has its special objectives, principles and conceptual constructions, different from the ones of the natural science. One of the features of humanitarian cognition is that it is directed on the subject who comprehends the various aspects of his personal being, but not on the object. Relying on methodologies developed by L.S. Vygotsky, the author formulates the main question of the article: what the method of psychology should be in order to meet two conditions. On the one hand, it should be appropriate for subject (not object) comprehending his personal being. On the other hand, it should allow comprehending the being hidden behind the phenomenon. Productive amplification of consciousness based on the principles of development and sign-symbolic mediation is considered to be a version of such a method. The author pays special attention to the phenomenological aspect of the method and especially to the position of the inner observer. In the course of the analysis, psychotherapy is proved to be a method of productive amplification of consciousness which is a specific tool of cognition in humanitarian science.

1. Anikina V.G. Psikhotekhnicheskaya model’ refleksii: teoreticheskie osnovaniya i opisanie [Psychotechnical model of reflection: theoretical background and descrip- tion]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2010. no. 6, pp. 50—56.
2. Bakhtin M.M. K metodologii gumanitarnykh nauk [To the methodology of the Humanities]. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1979, pp. 361—374.
3. Bakhtin M.M. K filosofii postupka [To the philosophy of the act]. Filosofiya i sotsi- ologiya nauchnogo znaniya. Moscow: Nauka, 1986, pp. 80—160.
4. Berdyaev N.A. Dukh i real’nost’ [The spirit and reality]. Filosofiya svobodnogo dukha. Moscow: Respublika, 1994, pp. 364—379.
5. Vygotskii L.S. Psikhologiya [Psychology]. Moscow: Aprel’-ekspress; EKSMO- PRESS, 2000. 1009 p.
6. Gusserl’ E. Fenomenologicheskaya psikhologiya [Phenomenological psychology]. Izbrannye raboty [Selected works]. In Kurennoi V.A. (ed.). Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2005, pp. 297—341. (In Russ.).
7. Zinchenko V.P. Posokh Osipa Mandel’shtama i Trubka Mamardashvili. K nachalam organicheskoi psikhologii [Osip Mandelstam’s staff and Mamardashvili’s Tube. By the beginnings of organic psychology]. Moscow: Novaya shkola, 1997. 336 p.
8. Il’in I.A. Religioznyi smysl filosofii [The religious meaning of philosophy]. Moscow: AST Hranitel’, 2007. 58 p.
9. Kubarev V.S. Fenomenologiya kak metod osoznaniya zhiznennykh smyslov. Chast’ 1 [Phenomenology as a method of understanding life expectations. Part 1]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psycho- therapy], 2013. no. 1, pp. 153—176 (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
10. Kubarev V.S. Fenomenologiya kak metod osoznaniya zhiznennykh smyslov. Chast’ 2 [Phenomenology as a method of understanding life expectations. Part 2]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psycho- therapy], 2013. no. 4, pp. 10—31. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
11. Kubarev V.S. Reshenie zadachi na smysl snovideniya kak metod issledovaniya osoz- naniya zhiznennykh smyslov [The solution of the problem on the meaning of dreams as a method of research awareness of life]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 2015. Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 86—99. doi: 10.17759/ chp.2015110308 (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
12. Lyzlov A.V. Polemika G. Ebbingauza s V. Dil’teem ob opisatel’noi i ob”yasnitel’noi psikhologii [Controversy G. Ebbinghaus and W. Dilthey on descriptive and explana- tory psychology]. Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii [Methodology and history of psy- chology], 2009. Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 87—95.
13. Mamardashvili M.K. Klassicheskii i neklassicheskii idealy ratsional’nosti [Classical and non-classical ideals of rationality]. Moscow: Publ. «Labirint», 1994. 228 p.
14. Molchanov V.I. Issledovaniya po fenomenologii soznaniya [Research on the phe- nomenology of consciousness]. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom «Territoriya budush- chego», 2007. 456 p.
15. Petrenko V.F. Mnogomernoe soznanie: psikhosemanticheskaya paradigma [Multi- dimensional consciousness: Psychosemantic paradigm]. Moscow: Novyi khrono- graf, 2010. 440 p.
16. Puzyrei A.A. Psikhologiya. Psikhotekhnika. Psikhagogika [Psychology. Psychotech- nics. Psychagogik]. Moscow: Smysl, 2005. 488 p.
17. Pyatigorskii A.M. Neprekrashchaemyi razgovor [Never-ending conversation]. Saint-Petersburg: Azbuka-klassika, 2004. 432 p.
18. Riker P. Chto menya zanimaet poslednie 30 let [What takes me the last 30 years]. Germenevtika. Etika. Politika (Moskovskie lektsii i interv’yu) per. s fr. Moscow: 1995. 160 p. (In Russ.).
19. Sapogova E.E. Zhizn’ i sud’ba: postroenie individual’noi mifologii, samoproek- tirovanie i subkul’tura lichnosti [Life and fate: building of individual mythology, pro- jecting and subculture identity]. Izvestiya TulGU [Bulletin TulGU]. Seriya «Psik- hologiya». In Sapogova E.E. (ed.) Vyp. 3, Tula: TulGU, 2003. pp. 195—214.
20. Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto: Opyt fenomenologicheskoi ontologii: per. s fr. [Being and nothingness: an essay on phenomenological ontology]. Moscow: Respublika, 2000. 639 p. (In Russ.).
21. Kholmogorova A.B. Dve konfliktuyushchie metodologii v issledovaniyakh psikho- terapii i ee effektivnosti: poisk tret’ego puti. Chast’ 1 [Two conflicting methodologies in studies of psychotherapy and its effectiveness: the search for a third way. Part 1]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling psychology and psychother- apy], 2009. no. 4, pp. 5—25.
22. Yurevich A.V. Tri istochnika i tri sostavnye chasti psikhologicheskogo znaniya [Three sources and three composite parts of psychological knowledge]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of High School of Economics], 2005. Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 3—18.