Post-Traumatic Growth and Coping-Strategies of Parents of Children with Disabilities

We present the results of an empirical study of the effect of coping strategies on post-traumatic growth (PTG) of parents who raise children with disabilities. We emphasize the need for psychological help for parents that emerges as a predictor of the most successful development of the child and improves the quality of life of the parent. In the course of the study, 113 parents of children with disabilities completed the Post Traumatic Growth Inventory and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. The results showed that coping strategies can either enhance or interfere with PTG. Positive reassessment, acceptance of responsibility, confrontational coping and search for social support have a positive effect on PTG, and planning has a negative effect. We drew up recommendations for the psychological assistance to parents of children with disabilities, based on the data and the concept of post-traumatic growth.

1. Abul’khanova K.A. Vremya lichnosti i vremya zhizni [Personality time and lifetime]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya, 2001. 304 p.
2. Antsiferova L.I. Lichnost’ v trudnykh zhiznennykh usloviyakh: pereosmyslivanie, preobrazovanie situatsii i psikhologicheskaya zashchita [Personality in difficult living conditions: rethinking, transforming situations and psychological defense]. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 1994. Vol. 15 (1), pp. 3—19.
3. Vasilyuk F.E. Psikhologiya perezhivaniya (analiz preodoleniya kriticheskikh situatsii) [Psychology of experience (analysis of overcoming critical situations)]. Moscow: Publ. MGU, 1984. 200 p.
4. Zaretskii V.K. Iskhodnye metodologicheskie predstavleniya o dvizhushchikh silakh samorazvitiya lichnosti v obrazovatel’nykh sistemakh [Initial methodological ideas about the driving forces of personal self-development in educational systems]. In Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie voprosy prodvizheniya lichnosti v mnogourovnevoi sisteme obucheniya [Psychological and pedagogical issues of personal advancement in a multi-level learning system]. Moscow: NIIVO, 1993, pp. 6—16.
5. Kryukova T.L. Psikhologiya sovladayushchego povedeniya v raznye periody zhizni: Diss. dokt. psikhol. nauk. [Psychology of coping behavior in different periods of life. Dr. Sci. (Psychology) diss.]. Kostroma, 2005. 473 p.
6. Kryukova T.L., Kuftyak E.V. Oprosnik sposobov sovladaniya (adaptatsiya metodiki WCQ) [Ways of Coping Questionnaire Adaptation]. Zhurnal prakticheskogo psikhologa [Practicing Psychologist Journal], 2007, no. 3, pp. 93—112.
7. Kryukova T.N., Saporovskaya M.V., Kuftyak E.V. Psikhologiya sem’i: zhiznennye trudnosti i sovladanie s nimi [Family psychology: life difficulties and coping with them]. Saint Petersburg: Rech’, 2005. 240 p.
8. Leont’ev D.A. Udary sud’by kak stimuly lichnostnogo razvitiya: fenomen posttravmaticheskogo rosta [The blows of fate as incentives for personal development: the phenomenon of post-traumatic growth]. In Makhnach A.V., Dikaya L.G. (eds.). Zhiznesposobnost’ cheloveka: individual’nye, professional’nye i sotsial’nye aspekty [Human vitality: individual, professional and social aspects]. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2016, pp. 144—158.
9. Magomed-Eminov M.Sh. Fenomen posttravmaticheskogo rosta [The phenomenon of post-traumatic growth]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki [Tambov University Bulletin: Humanitarian Sciences], 2009, no. 3 (71), pp. 111—117.
10. Mairamyan R.F. Sem’ya i umstvenno otstalyi rebenok: Avtoref. diss. kand. med. nauk. [Family and mentally retarded child. M.D. Thesis]. Moscow, 1976. 24 p.
11. Mastyukova E.M., Moskovkina A.G. Semeinoe vospitanie detei s otklo-neniyami v razvitii [Family education of children with developmental disabilities]. Moscow: Gumanit. izd. tsentr VLADOS, 2003. 408 p.
12. Kotsyubinskii A.P., Aristova T.A., Dityatkovskii M.A., et al. (eds.). Metodiki psikhologicheskoi diagnostiki bol’nykh s endogennymi rasstroistvami. Usovershenstvovannaya meditsinskaya tekhnologiya [Methods of psychological diagnosis of patients with endogenous disorders. Advanced Medical Technology]. Saint Petersburg: NIPNI im. V.M. Bekhtereva, 2007. 47 p.
13. Ryzhenko I.V., Kardanova M.S. Osobennosti reagirovaniya roditelei na prisutstvie v sem’e rebenka-invalida. Veroyatnostnye puti psikhologicheskoi pomoshchi [Features of parental response to the presence of a disabled child in the family. Probabilistic ways of psychological assistance]. Mir psikhologii [World of Psychology], 2003, no. 3, pp. 242—246.
14. Sergienko A.I. Pozitivnaya lichnostnaya transformatsiya i posttravmaticheskii rost u roditelei detei s osobennostyami psikhofizicheskogo razvitiya [Positive personal transformation and post-traumatic growth at parents of children with psychophysical development features]. Defektologiya [Defectology], 2018, no. 1, pp. 23—35.
15. Tkacheva V.V. Psikhologicheskoe izuchenie semei, vospityvayushchikh detei s otkloneniyami v razvitii [Psychological study of families raising children with developmental disabilities]. Moscow: UMK “Psikhologiya”, Moskovskii psikhologo-sotsial’nyi institut, 2004. 192 p.
16. Kholmogorova A.B. Kognitivno-bikhevioral’nye modeli i metody lecheniya generalizovannogo trevozhnogo rasstroistva [Cognitive-behavioral models and treatments for generalized anxiety disorder]. Sovremennaya terapiya psikhicheskikh rasstroistv [Modern Therapy for Mental Disorders], 2014, no. 1, pp.18—26.
17. Shipitsyna L.M. “Neobuchaemyi” rebenok v sem’e i obshchestve. Sotsializatsiya detei s narusheniem intellekta [“Unteachable” child in the family and society. Socialization of children with intellectual disabilities]. Saint Petersburg: “Didaktika Plyus” Publ., Institut obshchegumanitarnykh issledovanii, 2002. 496 p.
18. El’konin B.D. L.S. Vygotskii — D.B. El’konin: znakovoe oposredstvovanie i sovokupnoe deistvie [L.S. Vygotsky — D.B. Elkonin: sign mediation and joint action]. Voprosy Psikhologii, 1996, no. 5, pp. 57—65.
19. Calhoun L.G., Tedeschi R.G., Cann A., et al. Positive outcomes following bereavement: Paths to posttraumatic growth. Psychologica Belgica, 2010. Vol. 50 (1— 2), pp. 125—143. doi:10.5334/pb-50-1-2-125
20. Frenkel-Brunswik E. Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual variable. Journal of Personality, 1949. Vol. 18 (1), pp. 108—143. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01236.x
21. Frenkel-Brunswik E. Tolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Variable. American Psychologist, 1948. Vol. 3 (268), pp. 385—401.
22. Folkman S., Lazarus R.S. Coping and emotion. In Monat A., Lazarus R.S. (eds.). Stress and Coping: an Anthology. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991, pp. 207—227. doi:10.7312/mona92982-018
23. Folkman S., Lazarus R.S., Dunkel-Schetter C., et al. The dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology, 1986. Vol. 50 (5), pp. 992—1003. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.50.5.992
24. Ladouceur R., Talbot F., Dugas M.J. Behavioral expressions of intolerance of uncertainty in worry. Behavior Modification, 1997. Vol. 21 (3), pp. 355—371. doi:10.1177/01454455970213006
25. Lazarus R.S., Folkman S. The concept of coping. In Monat A., Lazarus R.S. (eds.). Stress and Coping: an Anthology. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991, pp. 189—206. doi:10.7312/mona92982-017
26. McDonough V.T. The many layers of post-traumatic growth. BrainLine, May 23, 2012. Available at: https://www.brainline.org/article/many-layers-post-traumatic-growth (Accessed 01.10.2017).
27. Scorgie К., Wilgosh L., Sobsey В. The experience of transformation in parents of children with disabilities: Theoretical considerations. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 2004. Vol. 32 (1), pp. 84—110
28. Steele R.B. Unremitting compassion: The moral psychology of parenting children with genetic disorders. Theology Today, 2000. Vol. 57 (2), pp. 161—174. doi:10.1177/004057360005700202
29. Schutte N.S., Malouff J.M. The impact of signature character strengths interventions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2019. Vol. 20 (4), pp. 1179—1196. doi:10.1007/s10902-018-9990-2
30. Taku K., Cann A., Calhoun L.G., et al. The factor structure of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: a comparison of five models using confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2008. Vol. 21 (2), pp. 158—164. doi:10.1002/jts.20305
31. Tedeschi R.G., Calhoun L.G. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 1996. Vol. 9 (3), pp. 455—471. doi:10.1007/BF02103658
32. Tedeschi R.G., Calhoun L.G. Trauma and transformation: Growing in the aftermath of suffering. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995. 163 p. doi:10.4135/9781483326931
33. Tedeschi R.G., Calhoun L.G. The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 1996. Vol. 9 (3), pp. 455—471. doi:10.1007/BF02103658
34. Tedeschi R.G., Calhoun L.G., Cann A. Evaluating resource gain: Understanding and misunderstanding posttraumatic growth. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 2007. Vol. 56 (3), pp. 396—406. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00299.x
35. Tedeschi R.G., Calhoun L.G., Groleau M. Clinical Applications of Posttraumatic Growth. In Joseph E. (ed.). Positive Psychology in Practice: Promoting Human Flourishing in Work, Health, Education, and Everyday Life. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2015, pp. 503—518. doi:10.1002/9781118996874.ch30
36. Zisook S., Shear K. Grief and bereavement: what psychiatrists need to know. World Psychiatry, 2009. Vol. 8 (2), pp. 67—74. doi:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2009.tb00217.x