Self-attitude as a Phenomenological Field of Diagnosis of Psychological Boundaries of the Personality

The article is devoted to the identification of opportunities and prognostic analysis of psychological diagnostic tools of personality boundaries in the system of personal relations. Meaningfully, the boundaries are presented as a special space for the formation of self – concept and self – relation, functionally as intra – and intersystem connections and barriers. The system aspects of personality as the universal self, of personality as self-identification and self-concept as a cognizant aspect of the Self are considered. Methods of restructuring the internal and external fields of these systems and subsystems and direction on the dynamics of boundaries are explained by the transformation of the system of personal relations. The boundaries of Self and non-Self act as a tool of its relationship in the field WITH and BETWEEN. The article highlights the substantial parameters of self-relation applicable to the assessment of the state and functions of personality boundaries: the system characteristics of self-relation and its configuration depending on the affective cognitive style of the individual and the attitude to the non-self.

1. Buber M. Dva obraza very [Two Types of Faith]. Moscow: AST, 1999. 592 p. (In Russ.).
2. Vizgina A.V. Rol' vnutrennego dialoga v samosoznanii lichnosti. Avtoref. dis. kand. psiholog. nauk [The Role of internal dialogue in self-realization of personality. PhD Thesis (Psychology)]. Moscow, 1987. 15 p. (In Russ.).
3. Vishina A.V., Panteleev S.R. Osobennosti Ne-YA kak podstruktury samosoznaniya [The peculiarities of the Not-I as a substructure of identity]. Voprosy psihologii [Psychology Issues], 2013, no. 6, pp. 42–54.
4. Dmitrieva N.V., Samojlik N.A. Krizis identichnosti: fenomenologiya perezhivaniya [Identity crisis: the phenomenology of the experience]. Novosibirsk: publ. of NGPU, 2012. 279 p. (In Russ.).
5. Kozlov V.V. Integrativnaya psihologiya: Puti duhovnogo poiska, ili osvyashchenie povsednevnosti [Integrative psychology: the path of spiritual search, or sanctification of everyday life]. Moscow: Psihoterapiya, Psychotherapy, 2007. 528 p. (In Russ.).
6. Martsinkovskaia T.D. Psikhologicheskie granitsy: istoriia i sovremennoe sostoianie [Psychological boundaries: history and current status]. Mir psikhologii  [The world of psychology], 2008, no. 3, pp. 55–62.
7. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Chelovek suverennyi: psikhologicheskoe issledovanie sub"ekta v ego bytii [Human sovereign: a psychological study of the subject in his being]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter. 2008. 400 p. (In Russ.).
8. Nekrasova  E.V. Zhiznennyj mir cheloveka kak predmet psihologicheskogo issledovaniya [The world of human Life as a subject of psychological research]. Sibirskij psihologicheskij zhurnal [Siberian psychological journal], 2004, no. 19, pp. 18–23.
9. Nikishina V.B., Petrash E.A. Modifikaciya metodiki “Avtoportret”  s cel'yu izucheniya dissociacii obraza YA [Modification of the technique "self-Portrait" to study the dissociation of the image of I]. Voprosy psihologii [Psychology Issues], 2016, no. 3, pp. 156–166.
10. Panteleev S.R. Samootnoshenie kak emotsional’no-otsenochnaya sistema [Sootnoshenie as emotionally-grade system]. Moscow: publ. of MGU, 1991. 110 p. (In Russ.).
11. Rubinshtejn S.L. Bytie i soznanie. CHelovek i mir [Being and Consciousness. Man and world.]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter. 2003. 512 p. (In Russ.).
12. Sokolova E.T. Affektivno-kognitivnaya differencirovannost' / integrirovannost' kak dispozicionnyj faktor lichnostnyh i povedencheskih rasstrojstv [Affective-cognitive differentiation / integrity as a dispositional factor in personality and behavioral disorders]. Vestnik moskovskogo universitetata [Moscow University Psychology Bulletin], 2007, no. 4,
    pp. 152–165.
13. Stolin V.V. Samosoznanie lichnosti [Self-consciousness]. Moscow: Moscow State University Press, 1983. 284 р. (In Russ.).
14. Tulupyeva T.V., Golyanich V.M., Shapoval V.A. Vzaimosvyaz' intencional'nyh i psihodinamicheskih pokazatelej v modeli lichnosti  [Correlations between intentional and psychodynamic characteristics in a model of personality]. Tr. SPIIRAN, 2009, no. 9,
    pp. 228–251.
15. Khlomov D.N. Dinamicheskij cikl kontakta v geshtal't-terapii [The dynamic cycle of contact in Gestalt therapy]. Gestalt-2003. The collection of materials of the Moscow Gestalt Institute. Moscow: Moscow Gestalt Institute, 2003. 105 p. (In Russ.).
16. Shapoval I.A. Rol' psihologicheskih granic lichnosti v mental'nyh mekhanizmah ee deformacij [Elektronnyi resurs] [The role of psychological borders personality in the mental mechanisms of its deformation]. GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences: Koncept: Scientific and Methodological e-magazine. Koln, Germany. URL: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-49252-2 (Accessed: 26.02.2018) (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
17. Shneider L.B. Deviantnoe povedenie detei i podrostkov [Deviant behavior of children and adolescents]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt; Triksta, 2005. 336 p. (In Russ.).
18. Ammon G. Handbuch der Dynamischen Psychiatric. München: Er. Reinhardt Verlag, 1982. Bd. 2. 967 p.
19. Berne E. Transactional analysis in psychotherapy: a systematic individual and social psychiatry.  New York: Grove Press. 1961. 270 p.
20. Braun B.G. The BASK model of dissociation. Dissociation, 1988, vol. 1, no. 1.
    pp. 4–23.
21. Heatherton T.F., Weinberger J.L. Can personality change? – Washington (DC): American Psychological Association, 1994. 301 p.
22. Perls F.S. Gestalt therapy verbatim. Highland, NY: The Gestalt Journal Press, 1992.
23. Rosenberg M. Conceiving the self. N.Y. Basic Books, 1979.