The Relationship Between Executive Functions and Prospective Memory in Primary School-Age Children with Symptoms of Subthreshold ADHD

The article presents results of the research of relations between executive functions and prospective memory in primary school-age children with symptoms of subthreshold attention deficit hyperactivity syndrome (ADHD). The ADHD Assessment Scale ― ICD-10 criteria (Sukhotina, 2008) and Observation Form for Recording ADHD Behaviors During Academic Performance in the Clinic or in School) (Carter, 1994) were used to assess the symptoms of ADHD. Cognitive functions were assessed using the Wisconsin Sorting Card Test (Grant & Berg, 1948), Сanum (Gutierrez-Martinez, 2018), Вlock span (Isaacs, Vargha-Khadem, 1989), Digit span-backward (Wechsler, 1997), and measurement by Ana B. Cejudo (Cejudo, 2019). 51 children were recruited, 27 subjects were 6–7 years old and 24 subjects were 10 years old. All participants were divided into 2 control groups (children with typical development) and 2 experimental groups (children with symptoms of subthreshold ADHD). Overall, it was found that children in the group of 6–7 years old with symptoms of subthreshold ADHD have no significant differences with children from the control group in basal components of executive function: working memory, cognitive flexibility and executive attention. However, they show a decrease in learning abilities, self-regulation and an increase of non-perseverative errors along with the fall of event-based prospective memory. Children in the group of 10 years old with symptoms of subthreshold ADHD also showed the fall of learning abilities and prospective memory. The results of correlation analysis show that subjects with symptoms of subthreshold ADHD have changes in the systemic ― functional level which appear as a decreasing amount of links between executive functions and features of prospective memory.

1. Velichkovskiy B.B. Funktsional'naya rabochaya pamyat': diss. … dok. psikhol. nauk [Functional working memory: Doctoral (psychology) dissertation]. Moscow, 2017. 340 p. (In Russ.).
2.  Devyaterikova A.A., Ismatullina V.I., Kasatkin V.N. et al. Ispol'zovaniye batarei neyropsikhologicheskikh testov cantab dlya otsenki kognitivnykh funktsiy v shkol'nom vozraste [Using a battery of neuropsychological tests cantab for assessing cognitive functions at school age]. In Ye.V. Pechenkova, M.V. Falikman (eds.), Kognitivnaya nauka v Moskve: novyye issledovaniya. Materialy konferentsii 19 iyunya 2019 g=Cognitive Science in Moscow: new research. Conference proceedings. Moscow: Buki Vedi, IPPiP, 2019. Pp. 598–602. (In Russ.).
3.  Polunina A.G., Davydov D.M. Viskonsinskiy test sortirovki kartochek kak instrument otsenki kognitivnykh funktsiy [The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test as a Cognitive Assessment Tool]. In T.B. Dmitriyeva (ed.), Sotsial'naya psikhiatriya=Social Psychiatry. Moscow: Publ. of GNTS SSP im. V.P. Serbskogo, 2004. P. 217–236. (In Russ.).
4.  Selezneva Yu.A., Mozgovaya S.A. Nekotorye osobennosti vklyucheniya giperaktivnogo doshkol'nika v slozhivshiisya detskii kollektiv [Some features of the inclusion of
   a hyperactive preschooler in the current children's collective]. In S.V. Pazukhina,
   N.S. Ezhkova, K.Yu. Breshkovskaya et al (eds.), Doshkol'noe obrazovanie v rakurse sovremennykh metodologicheskikh podkhodov i vozrastnykh tsennostei detei: sbornik statei=Preschool education in terms of modern methodological approaches and age values of children: a collection of articles. Tula: Izdatel'skii dom «Sreda» (Cheboksary), 2021.
   P. 109–113. (In Russ.).
5.  Sugrobova G.A. Osobennosti poznavatel'noi deyatel'nosti u mladshikh shkol'nikov s priznakami SDVG [Features of cognitive activity in younger schoolchildren with signs of ADHD]. Izvestiya PGPU im. V.G. Belinskogo, 2012, no. 29, pp. 335–342. (In Russ.).
6.  Sukhotina N.K., Egorova T.I. Otsenochnye shkaly sindroma defitsita vnimaniya s giperaktivnost'yu [Assesment scales for attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder]. Sotsial'naya i klinicheskaya psikhiatriya=Social and Clinical Psychiatry, 2008, no. 4,
   pp. 15–21. (In Russ., abstr. In Engl.).
7.  Balazs J., Kereszteny A. Subthreshold attention deficit hyperactivity in children and adolescents: a systematic review. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2014, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 393–408. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-013-0514-7
8.  Breitling–Ziegler C., Tegelbeckers J., Flechtner H. et al. Economical assessment of working memory and response inhibition in ADHD Using a combined n-back/Nogo Paradigm: An ERP Study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2020, vol. 14, article 322. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00322
9.  Carter S. School based assessment of attention deficit disorders. Oregon: Western Regional Resource Center, 1994. 56 p.
10.  Cejudo A., McDaniel M., Bajo M. Event versus activity-based cues and motivation in school-related prospective memory tasks. PLoS ONE, 2019, vol. 14(4), e0215845. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215845
11.  Grant D., Berg E. A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1948, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 404–411. DOI: doi.org/10.1037/h0059831
12.  Gutierrez-Martinez F., Ramos-Ortega M., Vila-Chaves J. Executive efficacy on Stroop type interference tasks. A validation study of a numerical and manual version (CANUM). Anales de Psicologia, 2018, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 184–196. DOI: 10.6018/analesps.34.1.263431
13.  Isaacs E., Vargha-Khadem F. Differential course of development of spatial and verbal memory span: A normative study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1989, no. 7, pp. 377–380. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1989.tb00814.x
14.  Laureys F., Middelbos L., Rommers N. et al. The effects of age, biological maturation and sex on the development of executive functions in adolescents. Frontiers in Physiology, 2021, vol. 12, article 1453. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.703312
15.  McDaniel M., Einstein G. Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory
    retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2000, vol. 14, no. 7,
    pp. 127–144. DOI: 10.1002/acp.775
16.  Miyake A., Friedman N. The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2012, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 8–14. DOI: 10.1177/0963721411429458
17.  Pasqualotto A., Mazzoni N., Bentenuto A. et al. Effects of cognitive training programs on executive function in children and adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A systematic review. Brain Sciences, 2021, vol. 11, no. 10, article 1280. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11101280
18.  Peñarrubia M., Navarro-Soria I., Fenollar-Cortés J. ADHD symptomatology, executive function and cognitive performance differences between family foster care and control group in ADHD-diagnosed children. Children, 2021, vol. 8(5), article 405. DOI: 10.3390/children8050405
19.  Salehinejad M., Ghanavati E., Harun A.R.M. et al. Hot and cold executive functions in the brain: A prefrontal-cingular network. Brain and Neuroscience Advances, 2021, vol. 5, pp. 1–19. DOI: 10.1177/23982128211007769
20.  Silva-Filho J., Pasian S. Typical performance of elderly patients with Alzheimer disease on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Dementia Neiropsychologia, 2007, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 181–189. DOI: 10.1590/s1980-57642008dn10200011
21.  Thomas R., Sanders S., Doust J. et al. Prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 2015, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 994–1001. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-3482
22.  Wechsler D. Technical Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Test. 3rd ed. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation, 1997.
23.  Yang T, Wang Y, Wang Y. et al. Event-, time- and activity-based prospective memory in children with ADHD. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2019, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 554–565. DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2019.1695801