Executive Functions in the Mental Set Formation Process: Shifting, Updating, Inhibition

8

Abstract

This study examined the mechanisms of mental set (Einstellung effect) formation. Earlier it was shown that executive functions are a system-forming element in the structure of the formation mental set mechanisms. Executive functions (shifting, updating, inhibition) are considered as possible mechanisms for the formation of mental set. Additional load on executive functions should influence the formation of mental set. To model mental set, adapted Lachins’ problems of two types were used – arithmetic and verbal. Loading of executive functions was carried out within the framework of the secondary task paradigm. It was demonstrated that additional loading of executive functions of any type does not prevent the formation of mental set on the arithmetic material. At the same time, loading the shifting function negatively influenced the mental set formation on the verbal material. Thus, additional loading of executive functions can, on the one hand, lead to reduce of fixation, and on the other, lead to strengthening of fixation. A small load on executive functions leads to fixation, an increase in load leads to reduce of fixation, and overload leads to an increase in fixation. Thus, the overall level of loading on executive functions plays a key role in the formation of mental set, and the interaction between them can be described as a U-shaped curve.

General Information

Keywords: mental set, Einstellung effect, fixedness, executive functions, working memory

Journal rubric: Cognitive Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2024170308

Funding. This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project number 22-18-00358, https://rscf.ru/en/project/22-18-00358/.

Received: 03.10.2023

Accepted:

For citation: Lazareva N.Yu., Chistopolskaya A.V., Vladimirov I.Y. Executive Functions in the Mental Set Formation Process: Shifting, Updating, Inhibition. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2024. Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 111–129. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2024170308. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Aleksandrov Yu.I., Svarnik O.E., Znamenskaya I.I., Arutyunova K.R., Kolbeneva M.G., Krylov A.K., Bulava A.I. Stress, bolezn' i nauchenie kak usloviya regressii. Voprosy Psikhologii [Questions of Psychology], No. 4, pp. 87–101. (In Russ.).
  2. Asmolov A.G. Po tu storonu soznaniya: metodologicheskie problem neklassicheskoj psihologii. M.: «Smysl», 480 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Velichkovskij B.B. Funkcional'naya organizaciya rabochej pamyati: diss. doc. psikhol. nauk. M., 2017. 340 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Vladimirov I.Yu., Karpov A.V., Lazareva N.Yu. Rol' upravlyayushchego kontrolya i podchinennyh system rabochej pamyati v formirovanii effekta serii. Eksperimental’naya psihologiya [Experimental Psychology], Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 36–50. DOI:10.17759/exppsy.2018110303 (In Russ.).
  5. Deeva T.M., Kozlov D.D. Acquisition of Abstract Knowledge in Implicit Learning of Anagram Solution Scheme. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2021. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 95–107. DOI:10.17759/exppsy.2021140103 (In Russ.).
  6. Isaev E.I., Margolis A.A. Learning Difficulties: Diagnosis, Prevention, Overcoming. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2023. Vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 7–20. DOI:10.17759/pse.2023280501 (In Russ.).
  7. Kozlov K.S., Gorbunova E.S. Object working memory load and perceptual similarity in visual search for multiple targets. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya = Experimental psychology (Russia), 2019. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 119–134. DOI:10.17759/exppsy.2019120309 (In Russ.).
  8. Korovkin S.Yu., Rys' A.O. Izmenenie osveshchennosti vliyaet na formirovanie myslitel'noj ustanovki. Lichnost', intellekt, metakognicii: issledovatel'skie podhody i obrazovatel'nye praktiki. Materialy III-j Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii 20-22 aprelya 2023 g. Kaluga, Rossiya. Kaluga, 2023. Pp. 30–38. (In ).
  9. Kotyusov A.I. Rabochaya pamyat i vnimanie pri kognitivnoj peregruzke: individualnye razlichiya i dinamika nejrokognitivnyh harakteristik: diss. … kand. psih nauk. Ekb., 2023. 147 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Lazareva N.Yu. Rol` rabochej pamyati v processe formirovaniya e`ffekta serii i vozniknovenii insajtnogo resheniya: diss. … kand. psih nauk. M., 2024. 234 p. (In Russ.).
  11. Lazareva N.Yu., Chistopol'skaya A.V., Anfalova S.V. Razrabotka neverbal'nogo zond-zadaniya dlya zagruzki upravlyayushchej funkcii tormozheniya rabochej pamyati. Yaroslavskij psihologicheskij vestnik. Uchrediteli: Rossijskoe psihologicheskoe obshchestvo, 2022. No. 1(52), pp. 48–52. (In Russ.).
  12. Lazareva N.Yu., Vladimirov I.Yu. Mekhanizmy tvorcheskogo resheniya zadach: vliyanie predvaritel'noj ustanovki na vozniknovenie insajtnogo resheniya. Psihologiya sostoyanij cheloveka: aktualnye teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy [Elektronnyj resurs]. Sbornik materialov IV Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Kazan, 8–10 noyabrya 2023 g.) / red. kol.: A.O. Prohorov, B.S. Alishev, A.V. Chernov, M.G. Yusupov. E`lektronnye tekstovye dannye (1 fajl: 1,40 Mb). Kazan: Izdatelstvo Kazanskogo universiteta, 2023. Pp. 379–383. (In ).
  13. Panikratova Ya.R., Vlasova R.M., Lebedeva I.S., Sinitsyn V.E., Pechenkova E.V. Scope and Perspectives of Neuroimaging and Neurostimulation to Develop the Theory of Systemic and Dynamic Localization of Higher Mental Functions. Кul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2022. Vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 70–80. DOI:10.17759/chp.2022180310 (In Russ.).
  14. Savinova A.D., Korovkin S.Yu. How are Working Memory and Representational Change Related: Specific and Non-Specific Approach to Insight. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2023. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 36–56. DOI:10.17759/exppsy.2023160403 (In Russ.).
  15. Tuhtieva N.H. Vliyanie irrelevantnyh parametrov zadach na effect ustanovki (na primere effektov Lachinsa i Uznadze): diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. Saint Petersburg, 168 p. (In Russ.).
  16. Falikman M.V. Effekty prevoskhodstva slova v zritel'nom vospriyatii i vnimanii. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological Journal], Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 32–40. (In Russ.).
  17. Ach N. Über den Willensakt und das Temperament: eine experimentelle Untersuchung. Quelle & Meyer, 1910.
  18. Aftanas M.S., Koppenaal R.J. Effects of instructional problems and jar position variation on the water-jar Einstellung test. Psychological Reports, Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 359–362. DOI:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.2.359
  19. Arnsten A.F. Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature reviews neuroscience, Vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 410–422. DOI:10.1038/nrn2648
  20. Baddeley A.D. Exploring the central executive. Exploring Working Memory Routledge, 2017. Pp. 253–279.
  21. Baddeley A.D. Is working memory still working? European Psychologist, 2002. Vol. 7, 2, pp. 85–97. DOI:10.1027/1016-9040.7.2.85
  22. Baddeley A.D., Hitch G.J. Working memory. The psychology of learning and motivation, 1974. Vol. 8, 47–89.
  23. Beilock S.L., DeCaro M.S. From poor performance to success under stress: working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2007. Vol. 33, 6, pp. 983–998. Doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.983
  24. Cowan N. An embedded-processes model of working memory. Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control, 1999. 20, no. 506, pp. 1013–1019. DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139174909.006
  25. Cowen E.L. Stress reduction and problem-solving rigidity. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1952. Vol. 16, 6, pp. 425–428. DOI:10.1037/h0060888
  26. Crooks N.M., McNeil N.M. Increased practice with “set” problems hinders performance on the water jar task. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2009. Vol. 31, 31. DOI:10.1007/s10339-023-01141-5
  27. Fox J.R., Park B., Lang A. When available resources become negative resources: The effects of cognitive overload on memory sensitivity and criterion bias. Communication Research, Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 277–296. DOI:10.1177/00936502073004
  28. Guetzkow H. An analysis of the operation of set in problem-solving behavior. The Journal of General Psychology, Vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 219–244. DOI:10.1080/00221309.1951.9918281
  29. Jacobus K.A., Johnson N. F. An experimental set to adopt a set. Psychological Reports, DOI:10.2466/pr0.1964.15.3.737
  30. Jensen J. On the Einstellung effect in problem solving: Some critical remarks. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1960. Vol. 1, 1, pp. 163–168. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1960.tb01295.x
  31. Joëls M., Pu Z., Wiegert O., Oitzl M.S., Krugers H.J. Learning under stress: How does it work? Trends in Cognit. Sci., 2006. Vol. 10, 4, pp. 152–158. DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.002
  32. Juola J.F., Hergenhahn B.R. Effects of overtraining on the establishment of mental set in anagram solving. Psychonomic Science, Vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 539–540. DOI:10.3758/BF03327878
  33. Juola J.F., Hergenhahn B.R. Effects of training level, type of training, and awareness on the establishment of mental set in anagram solving. The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 155–159. DOI:10.1080/00223980.1968.10543460
  34. Kahneman D. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1973.
  35. Kendler H.H., Greenberg A., Richman H. The influence of massed and distributed practice on the development of mental set. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 21–25. DOI:10.1037/h0056909
  36. Knight K.E. Effect of effort on behavioral rigidity in a Luchins water jar task. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963. Vol. 66, 2, pp. 190–192. DOI:10.1037/h0046874
  37. Korovkin S. The role of working memory at different stages of insight problem solving: a critical review. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 2023. Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 407–417. DOI:10.17323/1813-8918-2023-3-407-417
  38. Korovkin S., Vladimirov I., Chistopolskaya A., Savinova A. How working memory provides representational change during insight problem solving. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, no. 1864, pp. 1–16. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01864
  39. Lighthall N.R., Gorlick M.A., Schoeke A., Frank M.J., Mather M. Stress modulates reinforcement learning in younger and older adults. Psychology and aging, Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 35–46. DOI:10.1037/a0029823
  40. Luchins A.S. Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 1942. Vol. 54, 6, pp. 95. DOI:10.1037/h0093502
  41. Luchins A.S., Luchins E.H. New experimental attempts at preventing mechanization in problem solving. The Journal of General Psychology, Vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 279–297. DOI:10.1080/00221309.1950.9920160
  42. Maltzman I., Fox J., Morrisett Jr L. Some effects of manifest anxiety on mental set. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 50–54. DOI:10.1037/h0057448
  43. Miyake A., Friedman N.P., Emerson M.J., Witzki A.H., Howerter A., Wager T.D. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive psychology, Vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 49–100. DOI:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
  44. Oberauer K. Working memory and attention–A conceptual analysis and review. Journal of cognition, Vol. 2, no. 1. DOI:10.5334/joc.58
  45. Reber P.J., Kotovsky K. Implicit learning in problem solving: The role of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1997. Vol. 126, 2, pp. 178–203. DOI:10.1037/0096-3445.126.2.178
  46. Rees H.J., Israel H.E. An investigation of the establishment and operation of mental sets. Psychological Monographs, Vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1–26. DOI:10.1037/h0093375
  47. Sandi C., Loscertales M., Guaza C. Experience‐dependent facilitating effect of corticosterone on spatial memory formation in the water maze. European journal of neuroscience, 1997. Vol. 9, 4, pp. 637–642. DOI:10.1111/j.1460-9568.1997.tb01412.x
  48. Savinova A., Padalka J., Makarov I., Korovkin S. Tracing executive functions in insight. The Journal of General Psychology, Pp. 1–25. DOI:10.1080/00221309.2
  49. Tresselt M.E., Leeds D.S. The effect of concretizing the mental set experiment. The Journal of General Psychology, 1953a. Vol. 48, 1, pp. 51–55. DOI:10.1080/00221309.1953.9920173
  50. Tresselt M.E., Leeds D.S. The Einstellung effect in immediate and delayed problem-solving. The Journal of General Psychology, 1953b. Vol. 49, 1, pp. 87–95. DOI:10.1080/00221309.1953.9710679
  51. Vallée-Tourangeau F., Euden G., Hearn V. Einstellung defused: Interactivity and mental set. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2011. Vol. 64, 10, pp. 1889–1895. DOI:10.1080/17470218.2011.605151
  52. Van Stockum Jr C.A., DeCaro M.S. When working memory mechanisms compete: Predicting cognitive flexibility versus mental set. Cognition, Vol. 201, pp. 104313. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104313
  53. Wickens J.R., Horvitz J.C., Costa R.M., Killcross S. Dopaminergic mechanisms in actions and habits. Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 27, no. 31, pp. 8181–8183. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1671-07.2007

Information About the Authors

Natalia Y. Lazareva, PhD in Psychology, Senior Lecturer of the Department of General Psychology, Researcher of Laboratory for Cognitive Research, P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3807-8773, e-mail: lazareva_natasha93@mail.ru

Aleksandra V. Chistopolskaya, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor of the Department of General Psychology, Researcher of Laboratory for Cognitive Research, P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6156-4876, e-mail: chistosasha@mail.ru

Iliya Y. Vladimirov, Doctor of Psychology, associate professor, Department of General Psychology, P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9446-2975, e-mail: kein17@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 34
Previous month: 0
Current month: 34

Downloads

Total: 8
Previous month: 0
Current month: 8