Perception of Pictographic Alternative Communication Systems in Disorders of Intellectual Development

1

Abstract

Alternative communication is an assistive communication tool for people with communication disorders. Because of the variety of alternative communication symbols' graphic representation, it is important to evaluate both classical and unstudied symbolic systems from the perspective of their effectiveness in compensating communication difficulties for persons with disorder of intellectual development. This article deals with the specifics of visual perception and interpretation of concept-nouns and concept-verbs as elements of pictographic alternative communication. The sample of the study (N=92) consists of high school students at special education schools aged 13 to 19 years (M=15.5; SD=1.18), 72% are male. The study's stimulus material was composed of pictogram interpretation tasks in a verbal context and included symbols from three alternative communication languages: Blissymbolics, LoCoS ©, and Pictogram. The analysis of associative interpretations has shown that the factor of pictogram belonging to the particular system affects the correct interpretations of students with mild disorder of intellectual development (p=0.008), as well as the parameters of eye-movement activity: the number of gazes returns to pictograms (p=0.007), number of fixations (p=0.018) and viewing time (p=0.037). We conclude that, considering the cognitive characteristics of students with mild disorder of intellectual development, simpler graphic forms have the greatest efficiency in conveying information, regardless of the part of speech or level of schematism.

General Information

Keywords: disorder of intellectual development, alternative communication, perception, eye-tracking, oculography, pictograms, schematicity, parts of speech

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2024130305

Funding. the study was supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation № 24-28-01653, https://rscf.ru/en/project/24-28-01653/.

Received: 13.02.2024

Accepted:

For citation: Belimova P.A., Zashchirinskaia O.V. Perception of Pictographic Alternative Communication Systems in Disorders of Intellectual Development [Elektronnyi resurs]. Klinicheskaia i spetsial'naia psikhologiia = Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 2024. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 100–122. DOI: 10.17759/cpse.2024130305. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Andrusenko V.M., Popova E.A., Rimskaya T.O. Ispol`zovanie al`ternativnyh sredstv kommunikacii s pomoshh`yu predmetnogo PECS v ramkax obucheniya detej s DCzP s primeneniem osnov Aba-terapii [The use of alternative means of communication using subject pecs in the framework of teaching children with cerebral palsy using the basics of aba therapy]. Severo-Kavkazskij psihologicheskij vestnik = North Caucasian Psychological Bulletin, 2023. Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 27–36. DOI: 10.21702/ncpb.2023.2.3 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  2. Andrusenko V.M., Rimskaya T.O. Osnovnoe obshhee obrazovanie u detej, ispol`zuyushhih sistemu al`ternativnoj kommunikacii PECS [Basic general education in children using the PECS alternative communication system]. Severo-Kavkazskij psihologicheskij vestnik = North Caucasian Psychological Bulletin, 2022. Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 5–16. DOI: 10.21702/ncpb.2022.3.1 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  3. Bablumova M.E. Ehksperimental'noe izuchenie urovnya sformirovannosti kommunikativnykh umenii u doshkol'nikov s umerennoi umstvennoi otstalost'yu [Experimental study of the level of formation of communication skills in preschool children with moderate mental retardation]. Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Cherepovets State University, 2013. Vol. 1, no. 4 (51), pp. 162–164. (In Russ.)
  4. Belimova P.A. Sposobnost' lits s narusheniem intellekta k interpretatsii obshchestvennykh znakov [The ability to interpret social signs in individuals with intellectual disturbance]. Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika = Psychology and Psychotechnics, 2023. No. 2, pp. 101–109. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0722.2023.2.40902 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  5. Emel'yanova I.A. Osobennosti kommunikativnykh umenii i navykov i puti ikh formirovaniya u mladshikh shkol'nikov s narusheniem intellekta [Features of communicative skills and how to form them in junior students with intellectual disabilities]. Obrazovanie i nauka = Education and science, 2009. No. 1, pp. 86–94. (In Russ.)
  6. Zashchirinskaya O.V., Belimova P.A. Narushenie interpretatsii piktograficheskikh sistem podrostkami s legkoi umstvennoi otstalost'yu [Interpretive impairment: how adolescents with mild mental retardation understand pictorial systems]. Rossijskij psihiatricheskij zhurnal = Russian Journal of Psychiatry, 2022. No. 1, pp. 46–54. DOI: 10.47877/1560-957KH-2022-10106 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  7. Zashchirinskaya O.V., Gorbunov I.A. Ehmotsii v kontekste neverbal'noi kommunikatsii normal'no razvivayushchikhsya podrostkov i ikh sverstnikov s narusheniem intellekta [Emotions in the context of nonverbal communication of normally developing adolescents and their peers with intellectual disabilities]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya = Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Sociology, 2009. No. 3–2, pp. 174–185. (In Russ.)
  8. Zashchirinskaya O.V., Nikolaeva E.I., Shelepin E.YU. Ponimanie podrostkami s razlichnym urovnem intellektual'nogo razvitiya zhanrovykh kartin i tekstov [Understanding of genre pictures and texts by adolescents with different levels of intellectual development]. In: T.V. Chernigovskaya (Ed.). Psikhofiziologicheskie i neirolingvisticheskie aspekty protsessa raspoznavaniya verbal'nykh i neverbal'nykh patternov kommunikatsii = Psychophysiological and neurolinguistic aspects of the process of recognizing verbal and nonverbal communication patterns. Saint Petersburg: VVM, 2016. Pp. 191–202. (In Russ.)
  9. Il'ina Yu.S. Issledovanie kommunikativnykh navykov mladshikh shkol'nikov s zaderzhkoi psikhicheskogo razvitiya [A study of the communication skills of junior high school students with mental retardation]. Korrektsionnaya pedagogika: teoriya i praktika = Remedial Education: theory and practice, 2017. No. 1, pp. 38–43. (In Russ.)
  10. Isaev D. N. Umstvennaya otstalost' u detei i podrostkov [Mental retardation in children and adolescents]. Saint-Petersburg: Rech', 2003. 391 p. (In Russ.)
  11. Kozlova K.M. Obzor sposobov al'ternativnoi kommunikatsii, primenyaemykh v otechestvennoi praktike spetsial'nogo obrazovaniya [Review of alternative communication methods used in the domestic practice of special education]. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya = Problems of modern pedagogical education, 2018. No. 58–4, pp. 120–127. (In Russ.)
  12. Mamedova L.V. Narusheniya rechi i ikh korrektsiya u umstvenno otstalykh detei mladshego shkol'nogo vozrasta [Speech disorders and their correction in mentally retarded children of primary school age]. Upravlenie obrazovaniem: teoriya i praktika = Education Management: Theory and Practice, 2022. Vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 38–42. DOI: 10.25726/z2659-2699-2466-u (In Russ.)
  13. Medova N.A., Rudin I.V. Sovremennyi podkhod k formirovaniyu al'ternativnoi kommunikatsii u detei so slozhnoi strukturoi narusheniya razvitiya [Modern approach to the formation of alternative communication in children with complex structure of developmental disorder]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Tomsk State Pedagogical University, 2018. No. 1, pp. 9–14. DOI: 10.23951/1609-624KH-2018-1-9-14 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  14. Solodkov A.S., Zashchirinskaya O.V., Malakhova A.N., Yatmanov A.N. Navyki neverbal'noi kommunikatsii kak faktor sotsial'noi adaptatsii shkol'nikov s legkoi umstvennoi otstalost'yu [Skills of nonverbal communication as a factor of social adaptation of schoolchildren with mild mental retardation]. Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P.F. Lesgafta = Scientific Notes of the University named after P.F. Lesgaft, 2016. No. 1 (131), pp. 323–327. DOI: 10.5930/issn.1994-4683.2016.01.131.p323-327(In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  15. Abbeduto L., Klusek J., Taylor J.L. et al. Concurrent associations between expressive language ability and independence in adolescents and adults with fragile X syndrome. Brain sciences, 2021. Vol. 11, no. 9, art. 1179. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11091179
  16. Amery R., Wunungmurra J.G., Bukuḻatjpi G. et al. Designing augmentative and alternative communication systems with Aboriginal Australians: vocabulary representation, layout, and access. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2022. Vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 221–235. DOI: 10.1080/07434618.2022.2129782
  17. Dada S., Flores C., Bastable K., Schlosser R.W. The effects of augmentative and alternative communication interventions on the receptive language skills of children with developmental disabilities: A scoping review. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2021. Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 247–257. DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2020.1797165
  18. Dada S., Huguet A., Bornman J. The iconicity of picture communication symbols for children with English additional language and mild intellectual disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2013. Vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 360–373. DOI: 10.3109/07434618.2013.849753
  19. Denche Gil S., Morán Pallero N., Felipe Castaño E. Intervención mediante un sistema alternativo-aumentativo de comunicación en discapacidad intelectual y del desarrollo: diseño de caso único. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 2023. Vol. 2, pp. 241-259. DOI: 10.17060/ijodaep.2023.n1.v2.2513
  20. Dube W.V., Wilkinson K.M. The potential influence of stimulus overselectivity in AAC: Information from eye tracking and behavioral studies of attention with individuals with intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2014. Vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 172–185. DOI: 10.3109/07434618.2014.904924
  21. Forbes H.J., Travers J.C., Vickers Johnson J.A. Systematic review of acquisition and mastery of skills taught using the Picture Exchange Communication System. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2024. Vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 100–114. DOI: 10.1080/07434618.2024.2302154
  22. Fujisawa K., Inoue T., Yamana Y., Hayashi H. The effect of animation on learning action symbols by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2011. Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 53–60. DOI: 10.3109/07434618.2011.553245
  23. Gliga T., Elsabbagh M., Andravizou A., Johnson M. Faces attract infants' attention in complex displays. Infancy, 2009. Vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 550–562. DOI: 10.1080/15250000903144199
  24. Haupt L., Alant E. The iconicity of picture communication symbols for rural Zulu children. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 2002. Vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 40–49.
  25. Jennische M., Zetterlund M. Interpretation and construction of meaning of Bliss-words in children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2015. Vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 97–107. DOI: 10.3109/07434618.2015.1036117
  26. Judge S., Murray J., Lynch Y. et al. Attributes of communication aids as described by those supporting children and young people with AAC. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2023. Vol. 58, no. 3. pp. 910–928. DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12833
  27. Kudo M. Graphic design of pictograms focusing on the comprehension of people with intellectual disabilities–The next step in standardization: Pictogram design and evaluation methods. Visible Language, 2022. Vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 58–85.
  28. Lendio J.G., Teves S.M., Catalan D.S. Picture exchange communication system and its effectivity to the communication of learners with autism spectrum. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2023. Vol. 3, no. 3. DOI: 10.47760/cognizance.2023.v03i03.007 (In Span., abstr. in Engl.)
  29. Light J., McNaughton D. From basic to applied research to improve outcomes for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: Potential contributions of eye tracking research methods. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2014. Vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 99–105. DOI: 10.3109/07434618.2014.906498
  30. Lund S.K., Light J. Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part II — Communicative interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2007. Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/07434610600720442
  31. Mirenda P., Locke P.A. A comparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1989. Vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 131–140. DOI: 10.1044/jshd.5402.131
  32. Mizuko M. Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1987. Vol. 3 (3), pp. 129–136. DOI: 10.1080/07434618712331274409
  33. Musselwhite C.R., Ruscello D.M. Transparency of three communication symbol systems. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1984. Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 436–443.
  34. Othman A. Tawsol Symbols 3D — Towards an innovative Picture Exchange Communication Systems PECS. Nafath, 2021. Vol. 6 (18), pp. 18–22. DOI: 10.54455/MCN.18.04.041418
  35. Pope L., Light J., Laubscher E. The effect of naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions and aided AAC on the language development of children on the autism spectrum with minimal speech: A systematic review and meta-analysis [Electronic resource]. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-024-06382-7
  36. Schlosser R., Sigafoos J. Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: Integrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2002. Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 102–123. DOI: 10.1080/07434610212331281201
  37. Tamanaha A.C., Olivatti D.O.F., Silva S.C.D. et al. Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) Implementation Program for children with autism spectrum disorder. CoDAS, 2023. Vol. 35 (4). Art. e20210305. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232021305en
  38. Tijus C., Barcenilla J., Cambon de Lavalette B., Meunier J.-G. The design, understanding and usage of pictograms. In: D. Alamargot, P. Terrier, J.-M. Cellier (Eds.). Written documents in the workplace. Leiden: Brill, 2007, pp. 17–31.
  39. Vakil E., Lifshitz H., Tzuriel D. et al. Analogies solving by individuals with and without intellectual disability: Different cognitive patterns as indicated by eye movements // Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2011. Vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 846–856. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.08.006
  40. Wilkinson K.M., Light J. Preliminary investigation of visual attention to human figures in photographs: Potential considerations for the design of aided AAC visual scene displays. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2011. Vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1644–1657. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0098)
  41. Wilkinson K.M., Light J. Preliminary study of gaze toward humans in photographs by individuals with autism, Down syndrome, or other intellectual disabilities: Implications for design of visual scene displays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2014. Vol. 30, no. 2. pp. 130–146. DOI: 10.3109/07434618.2014.904434
  42. Zhang Y., Zhang J., Zhang J. et al. Teaching Requesting Skills to Children with Visual Impairment and Intellectual Disability by Using Picture Exchange Communication System Combined with Tangible Symbols. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 2023. Pp. 1-21. DOI: 10.1080/1034912X.2023.2295911

Information About the Authors

Polina A. Belimova, research assistant, Christian Academy of the Humanities named after F. Dostoevsky, Engineer, Center of Usability and Mixed Reality, ITMO University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-4924, e-mail: belimova_polina@mail.ru

Oksana V. Zashchirinskaia, Doctor of Psychology, Professor of the Department of Pedagogy and Educational Psychology of the Faculty of Psychology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Head of the Department of Psychotraumatology, Christian Academy of the Humanities named after F. Dostoevsky, Associate professor, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Care, Herzen State Pedagogical University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2666-3529, e-mail: zaoks@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 5
Previous month: 0
Current month: 5

Downloads

Total: 1
Previous month: 0
Current month: 1