The phenomenology of missing a deceased loved one in the context of different types of loss

 
Audio is AI-generated
0

Abstract

Context and relevance. This study is situated within the framework of “continuing bonds”, which has replaced the “broken bonds” model in understanding grief. Within this paradigm, the current work addresses the phenomenon of missing a deceased loved one, which occupies an intermediate position between normal and pathological grieving processes. A key theoretical goal is to differentiate between the destructive “yearning” experience (a criterion for Prolonged Grief Disorder) and the adaptive “missing” process. While integrating the painful loss experience with the function of maintaining a connection, “missing” requires in-depth phenomenological analysis. Objective. To identify and characterize the invariant and varying patterns of experiencing missing a deceased loved one in the context of different types of loss (death due to illness, old age, or accident/violent death). Hypothesis. The experience of missing a deceased loved one is not a unitary phenomenon but is structured into stable, identifiable phenomenological patterns, each associated with a specific type of loss (cause of death). Methods and materials. The study involved 105 participants (mean age M = 28.3, SD = 7.69). The inclusion criteria were having experienced a loss and reporting a current experience of missing the deceased. The methodology comprised in-depth semi-structured interviews, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), content analysis, and statistical analysis (Pearson`s χ², Kruskal–Wallis H-test). Results. Key differences between missing and yearning lie in the domains of affective intensity, attention focus (past vs. existential void), functional direction (adaptation vs. disorganization), and attachment. Loss due to illness was associated with episodic, acute surges of missing, somatic symptoms, and need for support, alongside a tendency for the intensity to decrease over time. Loss due to old age was characterized by persistent, situationally conditioned background experience of missing, with emphasis on memory preservation and reflection on life value. Loss through accident was linked to the most intense and prolonged experience of missing, specific somatic reactions (numbness, goosebumps), sense of personal transformation, and absence of intensity reduction over time. Alongside these specific features, an invariant core of the phenomenon was identified across all groups: the dominance of sadness, cognitive activity (memories, mental conversations), contextual conditioning (triggers), and an ambivalence of negative and positive aspects. Conclusions. Three phenomenological patterns of experiencing missing, associated with the circumstances of loss, were empirically identified: wave-like pattern (illness), background pattern (old age), and disorganizing pattern (sudden death). The structural heterogeneity of the phenomenon has been established, comprising both an invariant core and variable characteristics. The study confirms the dual nature of missing, which functions simultaneously as a resource for adaptation and a potential source of yearning — a maladaptive experience devoid of constructive potential.

General Information

Keywords: missing, yearning, loss, grief, cause of death, phenomenological analysis, experience patterns, continuing bonds, adaptation

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2025140406

Funding. The study was conducted with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 24-28-00896.

Acknowledgements. The authors would like to express their gratitude to A.V. Laletin for his assistance in collecting data for this study

Received 30.09.2025

Revised 18.12.2025

Accepted

Published

For citation: Saporovskaya, M.V., Kamenskaya, A.S. (2025). The phenomenology of missing a deceased loved one in the context of different types of loss. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 14(4), 90–107. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2025140406

© Saporovskaya M.V., Kamenskaya A.S., 2025

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Баканова, А.А., Донгак, Ч.Ш. (2025). Феноменология переживания предвосхищающего горя у родственников тяжелобольных пациентов. Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А.И. Герцена, 215, 157—168. https://doi.org/10.33910/1992-6464-2025-215-157-168
    Bakanova, A.A., Dongak, Ch.Sh. (2025). Phenomenology of the experience of anticipatory grief in relatives of seriously ill patients. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 215, 157—168. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33910/1992-6464-2025-215-157-168
  2. Василюк, Ф.Е. (1984). Психология переживания. М.: Издательство Московского университета.
    Vasilyuk, F.E. (1984). Psychology of experience. Moscow: Publishing house of Moscow University. (In Russ.).
  3. Ильин, Е.П. (2002). Мотивация и мотивы. СПб.: Питер.
    Ilyin, E.P. (2002). Motivation and motives. Saint-Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.).
  4. Козырева, В.В., Николаева, О.Ю. (2023). Особенности переживания утраты супруга женщинами разных возрастных категорий. Вестник университета, 3, 195—200. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-3-195-200
    Kozyreva, V.V., Nikolaeva, O.Yu. (2023). On the peculiarities of experiencing the loss of a spouse by women of different age categories. Vestnik Universiteta, 3, 195—200. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-3-195-200
  5. Кононова, А.И., Костромина, С.Н. (2023). Образ мира личности в ситуации переживания утраты близкого человека. Вестник РГГУ. Серия «Психология. Педагогика. Образование», 2, 31—54. https://doi. org/28995/2073-6398-2023-2-31-54
    Kononova, A.I., Kostromina, S.N. (2023). The image of the personality’s world in the situation of experiencing the loss of a loved one. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Psyсhology. Pedagogics. Education” Series, 2, 31—54. (In Russ.). https://doi. org/10.28995/2073-6398-2023-2-31-54
  6. Abric, J.C. (2005). La recherche du noyau central et la zone muette des representations sociales. In: J.C. Abric (Ed.), Méthodes d’études des representations sociales (pp. 59—80). Érès. https://doi.org/10.3917/eres.abric.2003.01.0059
  7. Boelen, P.A., van den Bout, J. (2005). Complicated grief, depression, and anxiety as distinct postloss syndromes: A confirmatory factor analysis study. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(11), 2175—2177. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.11.2175
  8. Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77—101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  9. Eisma, M.C., Boelen, P.A., Lenferink, L.I.M. (2020). Prolonged grief disorder following the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Psychiatry Research, 288, art. 113031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113031
  10. Fee, A., Hanna, J., Hasson, F. (2023). Pre-loss grief experiences of adults when someone important to them is at end-of-life: A qualitative systematic review. Death Studies, 47(1), 30—44. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2021.1998935
  11. Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press.
  12. Klass, D., Silverman, P.R., Nickman, S.L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315800790
  13. Køster, A. (2020). Bereavement and the meaning of profound feelings of emptiness: An existential-phenomenological analysis. In: C. Tewes, G. Stanghellini (Eds.), Time and body: Phenomenological and psychopathological approaches (pp. 125—143). Cambridge University Press.
  14. Le, B., Korn, M.S., Crockett, E.E., Loving, T.J. (2010). Missing you maintains us: Missing a romantic partner, commitment, relationship maintenance, and physical infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(5), 653—667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510384898
  15. Li, J., Sun, D., Zhang, X., Zhao, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Ni, N., Jiang, G. (2022). The relationship between anticipatory grief and illness uncertainty among Chinese family caregivers of patients with advanced lung cancer: A cross-sectional study. BMC Palliative Care, 21, art. 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00925-4
  16. Maciejewski, P.K., Maercker, A., Boelen, P.A., Prigerson, H.G. (2016). “Prolonged grief disorder” and “persistent complex bereavement disorder”, but not “complicated grief”, are one and the same diagnostic entity: An analysis of data from the Yale Bereavement Study. World Psychiatry, 15(3), 266—275. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20348
  17. Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. URL: https://qualitative-content-analysis.org/wp-content/uploads/Mayring2014QualitativeContentAnalysis.pdf (Accessed: 28.11.2025).
  18. Prigerson, H.G., Horowitz, M.J., Jacobs, S.C., Parkes, C.M., Aslan, M., Goodkin, K., Raphael, B., Marwit, S.J., Wortman, C., Neimeyer, R.A., Bonanno, G., Block, S.D., Kissane, D., Boelen, P., Maercker, A., Litz, B.T., Johnson, J.G., First, M.B., Maciejewski, P.K. (2009). Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLOS Medicine, 6(8), art. e1000121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121
  19. Prigerson, H.G., Boelen, P.A., Xu, J., Smith, K.V., Maciejewski, P.K. (2021). Validation of the new DSM-5-TR criteria for prolonged grief disorder and the PG-13-Revised (PG-13-R) scale. World Psychiatry, 20(1), 96—106. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20823
  20. Shear, K., Monk, T., Houck, P., Melhem, N., Frank, E., Reynolds, C., Sillowash, R. (2007). An attachment-based model of complicated grief including the role of avoidance. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 257(8), 453—461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-007-0745-z
  21. Smith, J.A., Flower, P., Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage Publications.
  22. Worden, J.W. (2009). Grief counseling and grief therapy: A handbook for the mental health practitioner. 4th Springer Publishing Company.

Information About the Authors

Mariya V. Saporovskaya, Doctor of Psychology, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of General and Social Psychology, Kostroma State University, Kostroma, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0852-1949, e-mail: saporov35@mail.ru

Anna S. Kamenskaya, Junior Research Fellow, Assistant of the Department of General and Social Psychology, Kostroma State University, Kostroma, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6648-6339, e-mail: annakam44@mail.ru

Contribution of the authors

Maria V. Saporovskaya — research concept and design, study supervision, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript drafting and critical revision for important intellectual content.

Anna S. Kamenskaya — data analysis and interpretation, manuscript drafting, and final text preparation.

All authors discussed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Kostroma State University of Psychology and Education (report no.1, 2025/02/10).

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 3
Previous month: 0
Current month: 3

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 0
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0

 Total

Whole time: 3
Previous month: 0
Current month: 3