Skip to Main Content

Experimental Psychology (Russia)
2018. Vol. 11, no. 3, 152–162
doi:10.17759/exppsy.2018110311
ISSN: 2072-7593 / 2311-7036 (online)

Intellectual competitiveness of a country: the problem of national IQ mediation

 
Audio is AI-generated
501

,

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar
Metrics

Abstract

The study investigates the link between intellectual competitiveness of a country with the national IQ — the evaluation of the intelligence of a population. The hypothesis about a mediation of this link by such variables as expenses for research, the number of specialists who conduct research, the patent index, is tested. The results indicate that expenses on research and number of specialists, conducting research, but not patent index, probably, mediate relation between national IQ with such indications of intellectual competitiveness as the share of a high technological production in export.

General Information

Keywords: intellectual competitiveness, national IQ, mediation

Journal rubric: Psychology of Intelligence

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2018110311

Published

For citation: Grigoriev, A.A., Lapteva, E.M. (2018). Intellectual competitiveness of a country: the problem of national IQ mediation. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 11(3), 152–162. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2018110311

© Grigoriev A.A., Lapteva E.M., 2018

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Gelade G.A. IQ, cultural values, and the technological achievement of nations. Intelligence, 2008, no. 36, pp. 711—718.
  2. Grigor’ev A.A. Nacional’nyj IQ i innovacionnaya aktivnost’ strany [National IQ and innovative activity of a country]. Sibirskij psihologicheskij zhurnal [Siberian Psychological Journal], 2016, no. 60, pp. 6—21.
  3. Grigor’ev A.A., Suhanovskij V.YU. Geografiya nauchnogo tvorchestva [Geography of a scientific cre­ativity]. Sovremennye issledovaniya intellekta i tvorchestva [Modern research of intelligence and creativity]. A.L. Zhuravlev, D.V. Ushakov, M.A. Holodnaya. Moscow, izd-vo «Institut psihologii RAN», 2015.
  4. Lynn R. Race differences in intelligence, creativity and creative achievement. Mankind Quarterly, 2007, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 157—168.
  5. Lynn R., Vanhanen T. Intelligence. A Unifying Construct for the Social Sciences. London, Ulster Institute for Social Research, 2012.
  6. Morse S. The geography of tyranny and despair: development indicators and the hypothesis of genetic inevitability of national inequality. The Geographical Journal, 2008, vol. 174, no. 3, pp. 195—206.
  7. Rindermann H., Sailer M., Thompson J. The impact of smart fractions, cognitive ability of politicians and average competence of peoples on social development. Talent Development & Excellence, 2009, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3—25.
  8. Schwartz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 coun­tries. Advances in experimental social psychology. M. Zanna. N.Y., Academic Press, 1992, pp. 1—65.

Information About the Authors

Andrei A. Grigoriev, Doctor of Philology, Chief Researcher of the Laboratory of Psychology and Psychophysiology of Creative Activity, Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6186-2320, e-mail: andrey4002775@yandex.ru

Ekaterina M. Lapteva, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Researcher, Laboratory for Psychology and Psychophysiology of Creativity, Institute of Psychology of RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3051-6492, e-mail: ek.lapteva@gmail.com

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 1707
Previous month: 14
Current month: 4

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 501
Previous month: 2
Current month: 0

 Total

Whole time: 2208
Previous month: 16
Current month: 4