The role of executive functions and working memory subsystems in the formation of the mental set

The present paper investigates the problem of mechanisms of the development of the effect of mental set, which is at the core of the processes of the implicit learning, development of the experience and solving creative tasks. As such mechanisms we investigate the change of the parameters of functioning of executive control and working memory subsystems. As a result of an experimental study, based on modified tasks by A. Luchins, it was found that mechanisms of the development of the effect of mental set have a systematic nature and include such factors as the change of the parameters of the executive functions and the specifics of the processing and storage of information in modality-specific blocks of the working memory. The role of the executive control is dual: it is necessary for keeping in the sphere of the attention the operations during their automatization, and at the same it, it makes the automatized scheme conscient by destructing the developed effect of the mental set. The executive control plays a role of the element which sets the structure of mechanisms of the development and overcoming of the mental set effect. Processes which proceed during the information processing in working memory subsystems also play an important role in the development of the mental set effect, however their nature requires supplementary research.

1. Andrianova N.V. Ustojchivye oshibki v processe naucheniya: osobennosti i vozmozhnosti prognozirovaniya [Permanent mustakes in learning process]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psihologiya [Saint- Petersbourg University Journal. Psychology], 2014, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 124—131. (In Russ.).
2. Baddeley A.D., Hitch G. Working memory. Psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 8, G. Bower (Ed.). N.Y., Academic Press, 1974, pp. 47—89.
3. Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1999, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 577— 660. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99532147
4. Bilalić M., McLeod P., Gobet F. Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect. Cognition, 2008, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 652—661. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.005
5. Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Academic medicine, 2003, vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 775-780.
6. Karpov A.V. Zakonomernosti strukturnoj organizacii refleksivnyh processov [Reflexive processes organization]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2006, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 18—28. (In Russ.).
7. Karpov A.A., Karpov A.V. Vzaimosvyaz’ psihometricheskogo intellekta s organizaciej metakognitivnyh processov i kachestv lichnosti [Interactions between psychometric intelligence and metacognitive processes and personality traits]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2016, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 69—78. (In Russ.).
8. Koneva E.V. Professional’nyj opyt kak predmet psihologicheskogo issledovaniya [Professional experience as an object of psychological research]. Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni P.G. Demidova. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki [Journal of P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University. Humanities], 2008, no. 5, pp. 40—44. (In Russ.).
9. Kornilov YU.K., Drapak E.V. Prakticheskoe myshlenie: sub”ektnaya determinaciya // Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2010. T. 31. № 2. S. 39—47. (In Russ.).
10. Korovkin S.YU., Savinova A.D. Detekciya protivorechij v processe resheniya insajtnyh zadach [Detection of controversies in insight tasks]. Sed’maya mezhdunarodnaya konferenciya po kognitivnoj nauke Tezisy dokladov [The 7th international conference of cognitive science]. Y.I. Aleksandrov, K.V. Anohin (Eds.). Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN, 2016, pp. 341—342. (In Russ.).
11. Luchins A.S., Luchins, E.H. New experimental attempts at preventing mechanization in problem solving. The Journal of General Psychology, 1950, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 279—297. doi:10.1080/00221309.1950.9920160
12. Nosulenko V.N., Samojlenko E.S. Nakoplenie i peredacha kognitivnogo opyta v processah obshcheniya [Cognitive experience in learning processes]. Vestnik Rossijskogo gumanitarnogo fonda [Journal of the Russian Foundation of Humanities], 2014, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 132—140. (In Russ.).
13. Öllinger M., Jones G., Knoblich G. Investigating the effect of mental set on insight problem solving. Experimental psychology, 2008, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 269—282. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.4.269.
14. Reber P.J., Kotovsky K. Implicit learning in problem solving: The role of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1997, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 178—203.
15. Reverberi C., Toraldo A., D’Agostini S., Skrap M. Bet- ter without (lateral) frontal cortex? Insight problems solved by frontal patients. Brain, 2005, vol. 128, no. 12, pp. 2882—2890. doi:10.1093/brain/awh577
16. Rogers R.D., Monsell S. The cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1995, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 207—231.
17. Tuhtieva N.H. Vliyanie tipov izmeneniya irrelevantnyh parametrov zadach na ehffekt ustanovki [The impact of the change of the irrelevant parameters of the tasks on the effect of mental set]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psihologiya [Saint-Petersbourg University Journal. Psychology], 2014, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 41—48. (In Russ.).
18. Vladimirov I.Yu., Korovkin S.Yu., Lebed’ A.A., Savinova A.D., Chistopol’skaya A.V. Upravlyayushchij kontrol’ i intuiciya na razlichnyh ehtapah tvorcheskogo resheniya [Executive functions and intuition in creative problem solving]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2016, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 48—60. (In Russ.).
19. Vladimirov I.Yu., Chenyakov G.S. Rol’ rabochej pamyati v snyatii ehffekta fiksirovannosti v rezul’tate korotkoj serii pri reshenii zadach [Working memory role in fixation effect as a result of a short set in problem solving]. Eksperimental’nyj metod v strukture psihologicheskogo znaniya [Experimental method in a structure of psychological knowledge]. V.A. Barabanshchikov (Eds.). Moscow, IP RAN, 2012, pp. 218—223. (In Russ.).
20. Wiley J. Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & cognition, 1998, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 716—730. doi:10.3758/BF03211392