The representational change as a mechanism of aesthetic experience during the perception of artistic paintings

Context and relevance. The article is devoted to the study of the representational change as one of the mechanisms of aesthetic perception of painting. The relationship between such phenomena as insight and intellectual fine art, related to the practice of obtaining pleasure of the mind, is considered. This pleasure is based on the violation of expectations caused by the initial representation, the representational change and the creation of a new interpretation. The representational change is accompanied by an emotional reaction. One of the ways to the representational change in the perception of painting is the discrepancy between the title of the painting and the primary superficial interpretation of the image. The paper presents the results of an experimental study of the influence of the role of the title, the representational change on the aesthetic experience of the viewer and the severity of the aha-experience. Objective: to test the assumption about the fundamental similarity of the mechanisms of subjective experiences during insight and perception of works of art, including a change in the primary superficial interpretation of the image, which underlies intellectual art. Hypothesis. Paintings with titles that change representation (intellectual) have higher scores on the scales: interest, aesthetic pleasure and higher scores on the battery of A. Danek scales for identifying the degree of expression of the aha-experience than paintings with titles that do not change the initial representation (descriptive) and paintings without titles. Methods and materials. The study involved 60 subjects, aged 17—27 years (M = 19.5, SD = 1.49), including 3 men, 57 women. This article attempts to compare the processes of insightful solution and perception of art within the framework of a single phenomenology, using tools that have not previously been used in studies devoted to the perception of art — a modification of the questionnaire for assessing insight by A. Danek. Results. It is shown that paintings with a title that changes the initial representation arouse greater interest, as well as higher scores on the aha-experience scales, than paintings with titles that do not change the representation or paintings without a title. Conclusions. One of the mechanisms of aesthetic perception of intellectual art is a change in the viewer's representation due to the violation of his expectations. One of the ways of such a change in representation in the perception of painting is the title of the painting, which changes the initial representation caused by a superficial interpretation of the image.

1. Дазал, Дж. (2023). Любопытное искусство. Самые странные, смешные и увлекательные истории, скрытые за великими художниками и их шедеврами. М.: Эксмо.
   Dazal, J. (2023). ArtCurious: Stories of the Unexpected, Slightly Odd, and Strangely Wonderful in Art History. Moscow: Eksmo. (In Russ.).
2. Коровкин, С.Ю. (2021). Роль антиципации и ожиданий в инсайтном решении. Психологические исследования, 14(76), 1—26. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v14i76.141
   Korovkin, S.Yu. (2021). The role of anticipation and expectations in insight problem solving. Psychological studies, 14(76), 1—26. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v14i76.141
3. Липов, А.Н. (2015). Джон Милтон Кейдж. «4,33» — пьеса молчаливого присутствия. Тишина, или анархия молчания? Часть 1. Культура и искусство, 4, 436—454. https://doi.org/10.7256/2222-1956.2015.4.15062
   Lipov, A.N. (2015). John Milton Cage. “4,33” — a play of silent presence. Silence, or anarchy of silence? Part 1. Culture and art, 4, 436—454. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7256/2222-1956.2015.4.15062
4. Маркин, Ф.Н., Коровкин, С.Ю. (2022). Ага-переживание в инсайтном решении зависит от смены репрезентации. В: И.А. Филенко (ред.), Мир человека в фокусе психологических метапрактик: материалы VIII сибирского психологического форума (c. 82—83). Томск: Изд-во Томского государственного университета.
   Markin, F.N., Korovkin, S.Yu. (2022). The aha-experience in an insightful solution depends on a change in representation. In: I.A. Filenko (Ed.), The human world in the focus of psychological metapractices: materials of the VIII Siberian psychological forum (pp. 82—83). Tomsk: Publishing house of Tomsk State University. (In Russ.).
5. Морошкина, Н.В., Аммалайнен, А.В., Савина, А.И. (2020). В погоне за инсайтом: современные подходы и методы измерения инсайта в когнитивной психологии. Психологические исследования, 13(74), 5. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v13i74.163
   Moroshkina, N.V., Ammalainen, A.V., Savina, A.I. (2020). Catching up with insight: modern approaches and methods of measuring insight in cognitive psychology. Psychological studies, 13(74), 5. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v13i74.163
6. Чистопольская, А.В., Савинова, А.Д., Лазарева, Н.Ю. (2021). Экспликация критериев инсайта и обзор методов их измерения. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, 18(4), 907—929. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-4-907-929
   Chistopolskaya, A.V., Savinova, A.D., Lazareva, N.Yu. (2021). The Explication of Insight Criteria and Overview of Their Measurement Methods. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 18(4), 907—929. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-4-907-929.
7. Bianchi, I., Branchini, E., Canestrari, C., Burro, R. (2022). On pleasures of the mind related to humour and insight problem solving: An investigation of people’s awareness of what they like and why. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 34(6), 778—795. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2022.2047058
8. Brieber, D., Nadal, M., Leder, H., Rosenberg, R. (2014). Art in time and space: Context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time. PloS one, 9(6), e99019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099019
9. Danek, A.H., Wiley, J. (2016). What about false insights? Deconstructing the Aha! experience along its multiple dimensions for correct and incorrect solutions separately. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 2077. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02077
10. Hekkert, P., Van Wieringen, P.C. (1990). Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings. British journal of psychology, 81(4), 483—495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02374.x
11. Kirk, U., Skov, M., Hulme, O., Christensen, M.S., Zeki, S. (2009). Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 44(3), 1125—1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.009
12. Korovkin, S.Y., Morozova, E.N., Nikiforova, O.S. (2024). Funny? Think About It! Selective effect of cognitive mechanisms of humour on insight problems. Cognition and Emotion, 38(5), 768—788. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2316861
13. Kubovy, M. (1999). On the pleasures of the mind. In: D. Kahneman, E. Diener, N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 134—154). Russell Sage Foundation.
14. Leder, H., Carbon, C.-C., Ripsas, A.-L. (2006). Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta psychologica, 121(2), 176—198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005
15. Millis, K. (2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: the influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 1(3), 320—329. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.320
16. Minissale, G. (2012). Conceptual art: A blind spot for neuroaesthetics? Leonardo, 45(1), 43—48. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00324
17. Muth, C., Hesslinger, V.M., Carbon, C.-C. (2015). The appeal of challenge in the perception of art: How ambiguity, solvability of ambiguity, and the opportunity for insight affect appreciation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(3), 206—216. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038814
18. Ohlsson S. (2011). Deep learning: How the mind overrides experience. Cambridge University Press.
19. Pelowski, M., Markey, P.S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of life reviews, 21, 80—125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003
20. Shumilov, T.V., Chistopolskaya, A.V., Vladimirov, I.Yu. (2023). The Path to Insight: Developing Methods to Increase the Effectiveness of Insightful Solution Detection. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 20(3), 473—489. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2023-3-473-489
21. Thömmes, K, Hübner, R.A. (2014). Picture is Worth a Word: The Effect Of Titles On Aesthetic Judgments. IAEA. In: A. Kozbelt (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-third Biennial Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics (22 Aug 2014 — 24 Aug 2014) (pp. 599—603). New York.
22. Wagner, V., Menninghaus, W., Hanich, J., Jacobsen, T. (2014). Art schema effects on affective experience: The case of disgusting images. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(2), 120—129. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036126
23. Webb, M.E., Little, D.R., Cropper, S.J. (2018). Once more with feeling: Normative data for the aha experience in insight and noninsight problems. Behavior research methods, 50(5), 2035—2056. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0972-9