Skip to Main Content

Experimental Psychology (Russia)
2020. Vol. 13, no. 3, 31–45
doi:10.17759/exppsy.2020130303
ISSN: 2072-7593 / 2311-7036 (online)

Equivalence of the Classical Rubber Hand Illusion and the Virtual Hand Illusion

520

V.P. Vorobeva, O.S. Perepelkina, G.A. Arina

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

Computer technologies implementation into the body illusions research is increasing because they allow to controllably model complex processes that cannot be realised in ordinary life. It was previously demonstrated that the rubber hand illusion may be reconstructed in the virtual setting and cause similar changes in the somatoperception when the virtual hand begins to feel like your own. This result suggests that the phenomenological experience obtained in the classical illusion and in its virtual reality version has much in common. However, a direct experimental comparison of the two illusion variants has not been made, therefore, in this research we studied the equivalence of the rubber and virtual hand illusions (RHI and VHI). The sample consisted of 16 subjects (18—25 years). As registration methods we used a subjective sense of ownership of an artificial limb and the proprioceptive drift of the real hand towards the illusory hand. The analysis has proved the equivalence of illusions.

General Information

Keywords: body perception, multisensory integration, body illusions, rubber hand illusion, virtual reality

Journal rubric: Psychology of Digital Reality

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2020130303

Funding. This work was supported by the RFBR grant № 16-36-00394 mol_a.

Acknowledgements. The authors are grateful to D.V. Romanov and Kozhevnikov clinic of nervous diseases for their assistance in the research, to A. Bobkov for software development, to A. Vasilyev for providing experimental equipment as well as to all the participants of the study.

For citation: Vorobeva V.P., Perepelkina O.S., Arina G.A. Equivalence of the Classical Rubber Hand Illusion and the Virtual Hand Illusion. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2020. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 31–45. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2020130303. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Bondareva I.B. Statisticheskii analiz dannykh issledovanii bioekvivalentnosti [Statistical analysis of bioequivalence research data]. Klinicheskaya farmakokinetika=Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2004. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14—22. (In Russ.).
  2. Krasnova-Gol’eva V.V., Gol’ev M.A. Virtual’naya real’nost’ v reabilitatsii posle insul’ta [Virtual reality in rehabilitation after stroke]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya=Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2015. Vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 39—44. DOI:10.17759/jmfp.2015040406 (In Russ.; abstract in English).
  3. Nestik T.A. Razvitie tsifrovykh tekhnologii i budushchee psikhologii [Development of digital technologies and the future of psychology]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologicheskie nauki=Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Psychological sciences, 2017, no. 3, pp. 6—15. DOI:10.18384/2310-7235-2017-3-6-15 (In Russ.; abstract in English).
  4. Perepelkina O.S., Arina G.A., Nikolaeva V.V. Telesnye illyuzii: fenomenologiya, mekhanizmy, eksperimental’nye modeli [Bodily illusions: phenomenology, mechanisms, experimental models]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya=Psychological Studies, 2014. Vol. 7, no. 38, pp. 9. Available at: http:// psystudy.ru (Accessed 07.04.2019). (In Russ.; abstract in English).
  5. Armel K.C., Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 2003. Vol. 270, no. 1523, pp. 1499—1506. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2003.2364
  6. Boesch E., Bellan V., Moseley G.L., Stanton T.R. The effect of bodily illusions on clinical pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain, 2016. Vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 516—529. DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000423
  7. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands «feel» touch that eyes see. Nature, 1998. Vol. 391, no. 6669, pp. 756. DOI:10.1038/35784
  8. Ehrsson H.H. The concept of body ownership and its relation to multisensory integration. In Stein B.E. (ed.), The New Handbook of Multisensory Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, 2012, pp. 775—792.
  9. Ehrsson H.H. The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science, 2007. Vol. 317, no. 5841, pp. 1048. DOI:10.1126/science.1142175
  10. Graziano M.S. Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1999. Vol. 96, no. 18, pp. 10418—10421. DOI:10.1073/pnas.96.18.10418
  11. IJsselsteijn W. A., de Kort Y.A.W., Haans A. Is this my hand I see before me? The rubber hand illusion in reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 2006. Vol. 15, pp. 455—464. DOI:10.1162/pres.15.4.455
  12. Jola C., Davis A., Haggard P. Proprioceptive integration and body representation: insights into dancers’ expertise. Experimental Brain Research, 2011. Vol. 213, pp. 257—265. DOI:10.1007/s00221-011-2743-7
  13. Lackner J.R., DiZio P. Vestibular, proprioceptive, and haptic contributions to spatial orientation. Annual Review of Psychology, 2005. Vol. 56, pp. 115—147. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142023
  14. Lenggenhager B., Tadi T., Metzinger T., Blanke O. Video ergo sum: manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science, 2007. Vol. 317, no. 5841, pp. 1096—1099. DOI:10.1126/science.1143439
  15. Liebert M.A., Riva G. Virtual reality in psychotherapy: Review. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2005. Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 220—240. DOI:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.220
  16. Lin L., Jörg S. Need a hand?: how appearance affects the virtual hand illusion. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception (Anaheim, California, 22—23 July 2016), NY, USA, ACM, 2016, pp. 69— 76. DOI: 10.1145/2931002.2931006
  17. Lloyd D.M. Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain and Cognition, 2007. Vol. 64 (1), pp. 104—109. DOI: 10.1016/J.BANDC.2006.09.013
  18. Loomis J.M., Blascovich J.J., Beall A.C. Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, 1999. Vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 557—564. DOI:10.3758/BF03200735
  19. Lugrin J.L., Latt J., Latoschik M.E. Avatar anthropomorphism and illusion of body ownership in VR. IEEE Virtual Reality (VR) (Arles, France, 23-27 March 2015), USA, IEEE, 2015, pp. 229—230. DOI:10.1109/VR.2015.7223379
  20. Ma K., Hommel B. The role of agency for perceived ownership in the virtual hand illusion. Consciousness and cognition, 2015b. Vol. 36, pp. 277—288. DOI:10.1016/J.CONCOG.2015.07.008
  21. Maselli A., Slater M. The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2013. Vol. 7, pp. 83. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00083/full
  22. Moseley G.L., Gallace A., Spence C. Bodily illusions in health and disease: physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a cortical ‘body matrix’. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2012. Vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 34—46. DOI:10.1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2011.03.013
  23. Perepelkina O., Boboleva M., Arina G., Nikolaeva V. Higher emotional intelligence is associated with a stronger rubber hand illusion. Multisensory Research, 2017. Vol. 30, no. 7—8, pp. 615—637. DOI:10.1163/22134808-00002577
  24. Preston C., Ehrsson H.H. Implicit and explicit changes in body satisfaction evoked by body size illusions: Implications for eating disorder vulnerability in women. PloS One, 2018. Vol. 13, no. 6, pp. e0199426. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0199426
  25. Regulation of biological products: (i) “Biological product” defined // U.S. Code, Title 42 — The Public Health and Welfare, Public Health Service Act, Second Subchapter, Part F, subpart 1, 2012. Available at: http:// uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:42%20section:262%20edition:prelim) (Accessed 07.04.2019).
  26. Rohde M., Di Luca M., Ernst M.O. The Rubber Hand Illusion: Feeling of Ownership and Proprioceptive Drift Do Not Go Hand in Hand. PLoS One, 2011. Vol. 6(6), pp. e21659. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021659
  27. Sanchez-Vives M.V., Spanlang B., Frisoli A., Bergamasco M., Slater M. Virtual Hand Illusion Induced by Visuomotor Correlations. PLoS One, 2010. Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. e10381. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0010381
  28. Slater M., Perez-Marcos D., Ehrsson H.H., Sanchez-Vives M.V. Inducing illusory ownership of a virtual body. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2009. Vol. 3, pp. 214—220. DOI:10.3389/neuro.01.029.2009
  29. Slater M., Perez-Marcos D., Ehrsson H.H., Sanchez-Vives M.V. Towards a digital body: The virtual arm illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2008. Vol. 2, pp. 6. DOI:10.3389/neuro.09.006.2008
  30. Slater M., Spanlang B., Sanchez-Vives M.V., Blanke O. First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLoS One, 2010. Vol. 5(5), pp. e10564. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010564
  31. Statistical Approaches to Evaluate Analytical Similarity: Guidance for Industry // Biosimilars, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, 2017. Available at: https://www.pbwt.com/ content/uploads/2018/06/UCM576786.pdf (Accessed 07.04.2019).
  32. Tsakiris M., Carpenter L., James D., Fotopoulou A. Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Experimental Brain Research, 2010. Vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 343—352. DOI:10.1007/s00221-009-2039-3

Information About the Authors

Viktoriia P. Vorobeva, Student, Department of Neuro- and Pathopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9111-983X, e-mail: vik.ki@hotmail.com

Olga S. Perepelkina, PhD Student, Department of Neuro- and Pathopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9357-8407, e-mail: os.perepelkina@gmail.com

Galina A. Arina, Senior Lecturer, Department of Neuro- and Pathopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1321-9354, e-mail: g.a.arina@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 845
Previous month: 30
Current month: 4

Downloads

Total: 520
Previous month: 11
Current month: 6