Negations in Speech as a Marker of Describing Emotional Negative Stimuli

113

Abstract

The article presents the results of an empirical study of the oral corpus of texts. Based on some theoretical and empirical data, we have suggested that negations in speech can be markers of describing emotionally negative stimuli, the experiments have allowed us to test this hypothesis. The Study 1 (N=42): subjects described two pictures that are opposite in their emotional characteristics (positive and negative). The Study 2 (N=32): subjects had to tell two memories about themselves: a frightening memory and a joyful one. The recorded audios were transcribed into written form. It was made by the system of phrase allocation (or elementary discursive units). So, we’ve got corpus of oral text. The corpus was analyzed by the presence of negations in it (particles and prefixes "not", the word "no"). Statistical analysis showed that frightening memories and an emotionally negative picture are described significantly more often with the use of negative particles (p≤0.001). Describing negative stimuli, negations were used twice as often as when describing positive ones. So, it can be assumed that the description of emotionally negative stimuli actualizes the use of negative phrases in speech. Such results allow us to consider negations as an implicit discursive marker, which indicates the negative emotional nature of the subject of speech.

General Information

Keywords: negation, negative assessment, negative marker, discursive marker, negative stimuli, oral corpus

Journal rubric: Psycholinguistics

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2023160410

Acknowledgements. The author is grateful to scientific adviser E.V. Ulybina for her support and assistance in understanding the results.

Received: 14.09.2022

Accepted:

For citation: Andreeva G.A. Negations in Speech as a Marker of Describing Emotional Negative Stimuli. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2023. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 143–156. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2023160410. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Ananyev B.G. Selected works on psychology. Vol. 2: Personal development and education. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Publishing House, 2007. 548 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Beloborodova A.V. Means of expressing negation and negative connotation in phraseological units with the meaning of indifference in Russian and English. Bulletin of the Pushkin State University of Leningrad, 2010. No. 1, р147—155. (In Russ.).
  3. Burova E.S. Segmentation of speech when creating a corpus of oral texts. Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 2021. No. 9, pp. 2657—2663. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/segmentatsiya-rechi-pri-sozdanii-korpusa-ustnyh-tekstov (Аccessed 03.07.2022). (In Russ.).
  4. Bandler R., Grinder D. Patterns of hypnotic techniques of Milton Erickson. Syktyvkar: Flint, 2000. 184 p.
  5. Gorin S.A. Have you tried hypnosis? (A practical guide to the use of hypnotic psychotechnics in medicine and business, advertising and propaganda, trade and everyday life). Popular science publication. Petersburg, 1995. 208 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Grebenshchikova T.A., Pavlova N.D. Discourse and its psychological impact: approaches to research. Psychological journal, 2017.Vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 18—31. (In Russ.).
  7. Discursive words of the Russian language: the experience of contextual and semantic description / Baranov A.N., Bonno K., Vasilevskaya N.B., etc. Ed. by K. Kiseleva and D. Payar. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Moscow: Metatext, 1998. 446 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Ershova V.E. Negation and negative evaluation as components of speech conflict: their functions and role in conflict interaction [Electronic resource]. Bulletin of Tomsk State University, 2012. No. 354, рр. 12—15. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otritsanie-i-otritsatelnaya-otsenka-kak-sostavlyayuschie-rechevogo-konflikta-ih-funktsii-i-rol-v-konfliktnom-vzaimodeystvii (Аccessed 27.04.2023). (In Russ.).
  9. Zhilyaev A.G. Intensive methods of assessing the psychological state, identifying and correcting psychological maladaptation: A methodological guide. Kazan: Vestfalika, 2009. 125 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Kibrik A.A., Podlesskaya V.I. Towards the creation of oral Russian speech corpora: principles of transcription. Scientific and technical information. Series 2: Information processes and systems, 2003. No. 10, pp. 5—11. (In Russ.).
  11. Kibrik A.A., Podlesskaya V.I. The problem of segmentation of oral discourse and the cognitive system of the speaker. Cognitive research, 2006.Vol. 1, pp. 138—158. (In Russ.).
  12. Paducheva E.V. Russian negative sentence. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture, 2013. 303 p. (In Russ.).
  13. Stories about dreams: a corpus study of oral Russian discourse [monograph] / A.A. Kibrik, et al. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures, 2009. 733 p. (In Russ.).
  14. Ubushaeva I.V. Pragmatics of negative statements in English and Russian languages.Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Language and literature, 2008. No. 4-2, рр. 207—210. (In Russ.).
  15. Freud Z. Psychological essays [in 10 volumes]. Vol. 4. Moscow: LLC "Firm STD", 2006. 325 p. (In Russ.).
  16. Shilikhina K.M. The study of discursive markers by methods of corpus linguistics. Bulletin of the VSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2015. No. 3, pp. 120—125. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/izuchenie-diskursivnyh-markerov-metodami-korpusnoy-lingvistiki (Аccessed 05.07.2022). (In Russ.).
  17. Bloom L.M. Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. New York: MIT Research Monograph, 1968. 270 р.
  18. Ginzburg J., Tian Y. No I Am: What are you saying “No” to? Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 2018, No. 21 (2), pр. 1241—1252.
  19. Gottschalk L.A., Gleser G.C. The measurement of psychological states through the content analysis of verbal behavior. Berkeley: University of California Press, 228 р.
  20. Incrimination through innuendo: Can media questions become public answers? / D. Wegner and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981. 40, рр. 822—832. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.40.5.822
  21. Inhibitory mechanisms in the processing of negations: A neural reuse hypothesis / D. Beltránand others. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2021. 50(6), рр.1243—1260.
  22. Lee-Goldman R. No as a discourse marker. Journal of Pragmatics, 2011. No. 43(10), рр. 2627—2649. DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.011
  23. McClelland D.C. Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington Publishers, 1975. 427 р.
  24. Negation as a means for emotion regulation? Startle reflex modulation during processing of negated emotional words / C. Herbert and others. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2011. No. 11(2), рр. 199—206. DOI:10.3758/s13415-011-0026-1
  25. Pea R.D. Origins of verbal logic: Spontaneous denials by two-and three-year olds. Journal of Child Language, 1982. 9(3), рр. 597—626.

Information About the Authors

Galina A. Andreeva, MA in Psychology, Postgraduate Student of the Psychology Faculty of the Institute of Social Sciences, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4155-8970, e-mail: andreeva_galia29@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 474
Previous month: 42
Current month: 20

Downloads

Total: 113
Previous month: 5
Current month: 9