Dynamics of affectivity in newspaper texts during the 1990s: Assessment and comparison with the emotional state of society

 
Audio is AI-generated
3

Abstract

Context and relevance. The study of collective emotions is crucial for understanding the socio-psychological state of society during periods of radical transformation. The 1990s in Russia, marked by cultural trauma, are of particular interest for analyzing the dynamics of public sentiment through the lens of media discourse and subjective assessments. Objective: to assess the dynamics of affectivity in newspaper texts during the 1990s, identify its connection with key socio-political events, and conduct a comprehensive comparison with data on the emotional state of society from sociological and socio-psychological surveys. Hypothesis. Media materials reflect the general direction of the society's psycho-emotional state; however, a shift manifesting as the “Pollyanna effect” (a bias towards positive evaluations in retrospect) would be observed in respondents' subjective assessments. Methods and materials. A psycholingustic analysis corpus of 56,789 texts from the “Arguments and Facts” newspaper (1983—2007) was conducted using machine-readable dictionaries to assess R. Plutchik's emotions and C. Osgood's factors. The data were compared with results from a Levada Center[1] sociological survey (contemporary assessments from the 1990s) and a 2024 socio-psychological survey (retrospective assessments, N = 1044). Results. A clear dynamics of affectivity in newspaper texts, correlating with key events of the era, was identified. Discrepancies between objective linguistic markers and subjective assessments were found: retrospective assessments revealed the formation of an “emotional concentrate” with more intense negative experiences compared to press data and contemporary surveys from the 1990s. Conclusions. Newspaper discourse is a relevant but mediated indicator of collective emotions. The identified discrepancies confirm the operation of psychological mechanisms of retrospective distortion and the “Pollyanna effect” in collective memory, highlighting the need for an integrated approach to studying the emotional state of society. [1] ANO Levada Center has been included by the Ministry of Justice in the register of non-profit organizations performing the functions of a foreign agent.

General Information

Keywords: collective emotions, affectivity, psycholinguistic analysis, media discourse, 1990s, cultural trauma, Pollyanna effect, collective memory

Journal rubric: Psycholinguistics

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2026190110

Funding. The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Project № 24-18-00570 “Affectivity evaluation of the Russian texts and its dynamics in the XX—XXI centuries: linguistic markers of the social psychological state”.

Acknowledgements. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Russian National Corpus (RNC, ruscorpora.ru) for providing the newspaper text corpus.

Received 23.10.2025

Revised 13.11.2025

Accepted

Published

For citation: Emelyanova, T.P., Bochkarev, V.V., Tarasov, S.V. (2026). Dynamics of affectivity in newspaper texts during the 1990s: Assessment and comparison with the emotional state of society. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 19(1), 150–166. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2026190110

© Emelyanova T.P., Bochkarev V.V., Tarasov S.V., 2026

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Баринов, Д.Н. (2016). Воздействие медиановостей на эмоциональное самочувствие региональной аудитории СМИ. Психология и психотехника, 7, 582—586. https://doi.org/10.7256/2070-8955.2016.7.20637
    Barinov, D.N. (2016). The impact of media news on the emotional well-being of the regional media audience. Psychology and psychotechnics, 7, 582—586. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7256/2070-8955.2016.7.20637
  2. Баринов, Д.Н. (2021). Природа массовой коммуникации и медиаконструирование страхов. Вопросы теории и практики журналистики, 10(3), 469—486. https://doi.org/10.17150/2308-6203.2021.10(3).469-486
    Barinov, D.N. (2021). Nature of mass communication and media construction of fears. Theoretical and practical issues of journalism, 10(3), 469—486. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17150/2308-6203.2021.10(3).469-486
  3. Бовина, И.Б. (2009). Социальные представления о здоровье и болезни: структура, динамика, механизмы: Дис. … д-ра психол. наук. Москва.
    Bovina, I.B. (2009). Social representations of health and illness: Structure, dynamics, mechanisms: Diss. Dr. Sci. (Psychol.). Moscow. (In Russ.)
  4. Гулевич, О.А. (2007). Психология коммуникации. М.: Московский психолого-социальный институт.
    Gulevich, O.A. (2007). The psychology of communication. Moscow: Moscow Psychological and Social Institute. (In Russ.)
  5. Емельянова, Т.П. (2009). Социальные представления и символический коупинг в условиях культурной травмы. В: А.Л. Журавлев, А.В. Юревич (Отв. ред.), Макропсихология современного российского общества (c. 85—136). М: Изд-во «Институт психологии РАН».
    Emelyanova, T.P. (2009). Social representations and symbolic coping in the context of cultural trauma. In: A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Yurevich (Eds.), Macropsychology of modern Russian Society (pp. 85—136). Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)
  6. Емельянова, Т.П., Дробышева, Т.В. (2016). Особенности проявления коллективных чувств к значимым социальным явлениям: сравнительный анализ групп с разной политической ориентацией. Наука. Культура. Общество, 2, 91—104.
    Emelyanova, T.P., Drobysheva, T.V. (2016). Peculiarities of the collective feelings to the significant social phenomena: a comparative analysis of groups with different political orientation. Science. Culture. Society, 2, 91—104. (In Russ.)
  7. Засурский, Я.Н. (2002). Журналистика и общество: балансируя между государством, бизнесом и общественной сферой. В: Я.Н. Засурский (Ред.), Средства массовой информации постсоветской России (с. 195—231). М.: Аспект Пресс.
    Zassoursky, Ya.N. (2002). Journalism and society: Balancing between the state, business, and the public sphere. In: Ya.N. Zassoursky (Ed.), Mass media of post-Soviet Russia (pp. 195—231). Moscow: Aspekt Press. (In Russ.)
  8. Левада, Ю. (1999). «Человек советский» десять лет спустя: 1989—1999. Вестник общественного мнения. Данные. Анализ. Дискуссии, 3(41), 7—15.
    Levada, Yu. (1999). The “Soviet man” ten years later: 1989—1999. Bulletin of Public Opinion. Data. Analysis. Discussions, 3(41), 7—15. (In Russ.)
  9. Назаров, М.М. (2004). Массовая коммуникация и общество: Введение в теорию и исследования. М.: Аванти Плюс.
    Nazarov, M.M. (2004). Mass communication and society: Introduction to theory and research. Moscow: Avanti Plyus. (In Russ.)
  10. Нестик, Т.А. (2023). Психологическое состояние российского общества в условиях СВО. СоциоДиггер, 4(9): Общество во времена СВО. URL: https://sociodigger.ru/articles/articles-page/psikhologicheskoe-sostojanie-rossiiskogo-obshchestva-v-uslovijakh-svo
    Nestik, T.A. (2023). The psychological state of Russian society under the conditions of the Special Military Operation. SocioDigger, 4(9): Society in Times of the Special Military Operation. URL: https://sociodigger.ru/articles/articles-page/psikhologicheskoe-sostojanie-rossiiskogo-obshchestva-v-uslovijakh-svo (In Russ.)
  11. Нестик, Т.А. (2025). Коллективный образ будущего: социально-психологический анализ. М.: Издательство «Институт психологии РАН».
    Nestik, T.A. (2025). The collective image of the future: A socio-psychological analysis. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.).
  12. Штомпка, П. (2001). Социальное изменение как травма (статья первая). Социологические исследования, 1, 6—16.
    Sztompka, P. (2001). Social change as trauma (article one). Sociological research, 1, 6—16. (In Russ.).
  13. Bocharov, V.V., Alexeeva, S.V., Granovsky, D.V., Protopopova, E.V., Stepanova, M.E., Surikov, A.V. (2013). Crowdsourcing morphological annotation. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies. Papers from the Annual International Conference “Dialogue”, 12(1), 109—115.
  14. Bochkarev, V.V., Achkeev, A.A., Savinkov, A.V., Shevlyakova, A.V., Solovyev, V.D. (2024). Large Sentiment Dictionary of Russian Words. In: H. Calvo, L. Martínez-Villaseñor, H. Ponce (Eds.), Advances in Soft Computing. MICAI 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14392 (pp. 68—82). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47640-2_6
  15. Bochkarev, V.V., Savinkov, A.V., Shevlyakova, A.V., Solovyev, V.D. (2026). Diachronic Predictor of Affective Ratings of English Words. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, Pre-press, 1—13. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-219358
  16. Bochkarev, V.V., Solovyev, V.D., Nestik, T.A., Shevlyakova, A.V. (2024b). Variations in Average Word Valence of Russian Books Over a Century and Social Change. Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 285(1), 14—27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-024-07419-z
  17. Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., Gupta, P., Joulin, A., Mikolov, T. (2018). Learning Word Vectors for 157 Languages. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), 3483—3487. 
  18. Kulagin, D.I. (2021). Publicly available sentiment dictionary for the Russian language KartaSlovSent. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Papers from the Annual International Conference “Dialogue”, 20, 1106—1119
  19. Kuznetsova, Yu.M., Chuganskaya, A.A., Chudova, N.V. (2024). Organization of Emotional Reactions Monitoring of Social Networks Users by Means of Automatic Text Analysis. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 51(6), 645—652. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688224700618
  20. Mohammad, S.M. (2018a). Obtaining Reliable Human Ratings of Valence, Arousal, and Domi-nance for 20,000 English Words. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 174—184).
  21. Mohammad, S.M. (2018b). Word Affect Intensities. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018) (pp. 174—183).
  22. Roseman, I.J., Mattes, K., Redlawsk, D.P., Katz, S. (2020). Reprehensible, laughable: The role of contempt in negative campaigning. American Politics Research, 48(1), 44—77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X19857968
  23. Soriano, C., Ogarkova, A. (2025). The meaning of ‘frustration’ across languages. Language and Cognition, 17, e16.

Information About the Authors

Tatiana P. Emelyanova, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Chief Researcher in the Laboratory of Social and Economic Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0458-7705, e-mail: t_emelyanova@inbox.ru

Vladimir V. Bochkarev, Engineer, Research Laboratory “Multidisciplinary Text Studies”, Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8792-1491, e-mail: vbochkarev@mail.ru

Semyon V. Tarasov, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Researcher, Laboratory of Social and Economic Psychology, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Junior researcher, Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Research Laboratory "Multidisciplinary Text Studies",Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8790-7219, e-mail: sementarasovvas@gmail.com

Contribution of the authors

Tatyana P. Emelyanova — ideas; planning of the research; annotation, writing and design of the manuscript; control over the research.

Vladimir V. Bochkarev — ideas; planning of the research; application of statistical, mathematical and other methods for data analysis; visualization of research results; annotation, writing and design of the manuscript.

Semyon V. Tarasov — ideas; planning of the research; application of statistical, mathematical and other methods for data analysis; visualization of research results; annotation, writing and design of the manuscript.

All authors participated in the discussion of the results and approved the final text of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration (WMA, 2013) and the ethical codes of the Russian Psychological Society (RPS) and the American Psychological Association (APA). Participation in the survey was voluntary, and the data were anonymized. Given the nature of the research (survey, analysis of anonymous non-interventional data, analysis of sociological studies and newspaper corpora) and in compliance with institutional guidelines, formal approval from an ethics committee was not required.

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 8
Previous month: 0
Current month: 8

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 3
Previous month: 0
Current month: 3

 Total

Whole time: 11
Previous month: 0
Current month: 11