What is empathy: cognitive concepts and models

Empathy is a complex and diverse indispensable mechanism in human interaction. It enables co-feel and mentally model what another person feels at the moment. For better understanding, empathy can be thought of as the ability to feel the consequences of some experience, not feeling it in reality, but just watching. The main consequences of this mechanism are our ability to imitate and understand the other person. The first helps in development and learning, and the second is indispensable in communication with other people. Studies of empathy are segmental and not well coordinated. Existing works offer different types and typology of systems of empathy. Yet, bringing new insights into certain areas, they do not create an integral picture. What are the available types& Are they simple analytically different ways of consideration of one system or are they different neuro-biological systems? If they are different systems, what is the extent to which they are linked and whether they form integral super-system? This article tries to answer these questions.

1. Avenanti A., Sirigu A., Aglioti S.M. Racial Bias Reduces Empathic Sensorimotor Resonance with Other-Race Pain. Current Biology, 2010. Vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1018–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.071
2. Betti V., Aglioti S.M. Dynamic construction of the neural networks underpinning empathy for pain for pain. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2016. Vol. 63, pp. 191–206. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.02.009
3. Cheon B.K. et al. Cultural influences on neural basis of intergroup empathy. NeuroImage, 2011. Vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 643–650. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.031
4. Ferrè E.R., Lopez C., Haggard P. Anchoring the Self to the Body: Vestibular Contribution to the Sense of Self. Psychological Science, 2014. Vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2106–2108. doi: 10.1177/0956797614547917
5. Gonzalez-Liencres C., Shamay-Tsoory S.G., Brüne M. Towards a neuroscience of empathy: Ontogeny, phylogeny, brain mechanisms, context and psychopathology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2013. Vol. 37. no. 8, pp. 1537–1548. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.05.001
6. Hillis A.E. Inability to Empathize: Brain Lesions That Disrupt Sharing and Understanding Another’s Emotions. Brain, 2014. Vol. 137, no. 4, pp. 981–987. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt317
7. Cardini F. et al. It feels like it’s me: interpersonal multisensory stimulation enhances visual remapping of touch from other to self. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2013. Vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 630–637. doi: 10.1037/a0031049
8. Liew S., Han S., Aziz-Zadeh L. Familiarity Modulates Mirror Neuron and Mentalizing Regions During Intention Understanding. Human Brain Mapping, 2011. Vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1986–1997. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21164
9. Martini M., Valentini E., Aglioti S.M. Emotional conflict in a model modulates nociceptive processing in an onlooker: a laser-evoked potentials study. Experimental Brain Research, 2013. Vol. 225, no. 2, pp. 237–245. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3365-4
10. Mathur V.A. et al. Neural basis of extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation. NeuroImage, 2010. Vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1468–1475. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.025
11. Sacheli L.M. et al. Prejudiced interactions: implicit racial bias reduces predictive simulation during joint action with an out-group avatar. Scientific Reports, 2015. Vol. 5, no. 80507. doi: 10.1038/srep08507
12. Peck T.C. et al. Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and Cognition, 2013. Vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 779–787. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.016
13. Ramachandran V., Altschuler E. The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain, 2009. Vol. 132, no. 7, pp. 1693–1710. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp135
14. Rizzolatti Y.G., Craighero L. The Mirror-Neuron System. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2004. Vol. 27, no. 169, pp. 169–192. URL: http://psych.colorado.edu/~kimlab/Rizzolatti.annurev.neuro.2004.pdf (Accessed 29.12.2016).
15. Sartori L., Bucchioni G., Castiello U. When emulation becomes reciprocity. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2013. Vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 662–669. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss044
16. Shamay-Tsoory S. G., Aharon-Peretz J., Perry D. Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in prefrontal lesions. Brain, 2008. Vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 617–627. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn279
17. Chiesa P.A. et al. Subliminal perception of others’ physical pain and pleasure. Experimental Brain Research, 2015. Vol. 233, no. 8, pp. 2373–2382. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4307-8
18. Paladino M. et al. Synchronous Multisensory Stimulation Blurs Self-Other Boundaries. Psychological Science, 2010. Vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1202–1207. doi: 10.1177/0956797610379234
19. Tajadura-Jimenez A., Grehl S., Tsakiris M. The Other in Me: Interpersonal Multisensory Stimulation Changes the Mental Representation of the Self. PLOS ONE, 2012. Vol. 7, no. 7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040682
20. Xin F., Lei X. Competition between frontoparietal control and default networks supports social working memory and empathy. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2015. Vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1144–1152. doi: 10.1093/scan