Cyberbullying among Young Users of Social Networks



In the recent years, the number of studies of modern adolescents’ aggressive behavior in the Internet, including cyberbullying, has increased. However, so far there are few summarizing works describing different aspects of this phenomenon and its specific manifestations in various social networks. The goal of the article is a review of foreign studies on virtual aggression among young users of social networks. Studies revealing peculiarities of the Internet-bullying in popular social networks and its negative psychological consequences are considered. Statistical data on the prevalence of cyberbullying among adolescents in a number of countries are given. The main motives of cyber-aggression are analyzed, as well as risk factors stimulating the involvement of young people in cyberbullying and factors decreasing its influences on the psychological well-being of young users. The article describes some modern areas of cyberbullying prevention. Better understanding peculiarities of adolescents’ aggressive behavior on various virtual platforms will help to develop effective anti-bullying programs and to increase the level of security for youth activities in the digital space.

General Information

Keywords: cyberbullying, the Internet, adolescents, aggression, social networks, online risks

Journal rubric: Social Psychology

Article type: review article


For citation: Kiriukhina D.V. Cyberbullying among Young Users of Social Networks [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2019. Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 53–59. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2019080306. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


  1. Efimov E.G. Sotsial'nye Internet-seti (metodologiya i praktika issledovaniya) [Social internet networks]. Volgograd: Volgogradskoe nauchnoe izdatel'stvo. 2015. 168 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Degteva T.A. et al. Profilaktika kibermobbinga i kiberbullinga v srede nesovershennoletnikh: metodicheskoe posobie [Prevention cybermobbing and cyberbullying of adolescents]. Stavropol'skoe izdatel'stvo «Paragraf» [Stavropol publishing house «Paragraph»]. Stavropol’: Paragraf, 2017, 81 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Soldatova G. U., Rasskazova E. I., Nestik T. A. Tsifrovoe pokolenie Rossii: kompetentnost' i bezopasnost' [The digital generation of Russia: competence and security]. Moscow: Smysl, 2017. 375 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Staksrud E. Kiberbulling sredi detei I podrostkov uchastniki rasprostranenie formy prichiny – chto vzroslye mogut emu protivopostavit [Elektronnyi resurs] [Digital mobbing. Hvem, hvor, hvordan, hvorfor – og hva kan voksne gjore?]. Aggressiya v tsifre [Aggression in Numbers], 2014, no. 16. pp. 24–35. URL: (Accessed: 24.07.2019). (In Russ.).
  5. Khlomov K.D., Davydov D.G., Bochaver A.A. Kiberbulling v opyte rossiiskikh podrostkov [Cyberbullying in the Experience of Russian Teenagers]. Psikhologiia i pravo [Psychology and Law], 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp.276–295. doi: 10.17759/psylaw.2019090219 (In Russ.; Abstr. in Engl.).
  6. Aizenkot D. Cyberbullying in WhatsApp Classroom Groups among Children and Adolescents: Exposure and Victimization. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 2018, vol. 10, pp. 1–10.
  7. Steffgen G. et al. Are cyberbullies less empathic? Adolescents' cyberbullying behavior and empathic responsiveness  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2011, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 643–648. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0445
  8. Connell, N.M. et al. Badgrlz Exploring Sex Differences in Cyberbullying Behaviors. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2014, vol. 2, № 3, pp. 209–228. doi:10.1177/1541204013503889
  9. Barlett, C., Coyne S.M. A meta-analysis of sex differences in cyber-bullying behavior: The moderating role of age. Aggressive behavior, 2014, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 474–488. doi:10.1177/1541204013503889
  10. Bayraktar F. et al. Cyberbullying: e discriminant factors among cyberbullies, cybervictims, and cyberbully-victims in a Czech adolescent sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2014, vol. 30, no. 18, pp. 1–25. doi:10.1177/0886260514555006
  11. Gaffney H., Farrington D.P. Cyberbullying in the United Kingdom and Ireland. In Baldry A.C., Blaya C., Farrington D.P. (Eds.). International Perspectives on Cyberbullying: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Interventions. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, pp. 101–143. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73263-3_5
  12. Gini G., Pozzoli T. Association between Bullying and Psychosomatic Problems: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 2019, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 1059-1065.
  13. Varjas K. et al. High school students' perceptions of motivations for cyberbullying: an exploratory study. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2010, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 269–273.
  14. Hinduja S., Patchin W.J. Bullying, Cyberbullying and Suicide. Article in Archives of suicide research, 2010, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 206–221. doi:10.1080/13811118.2010.494133
  15. Hooft Graafland J.H. New technologies and 21st century children: Recent trends and outcomes: OECD Education Working Papers, no. 179. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2018. 61 p.
  16. Kim Y.S., Koh Y.J., Leventhal B. School bullying and suicidal risk in Korean middle school students. Pediatrics, 2019, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 357–363.
  17. Chatzakou D. et al. Mean Birds: Detecting Aggression and Bullying on Twitter Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on web science conference, New York: ACM, 2017, pp. 13–22. doi:10.1145/3091478.3091487
  18. Mesch G. Parental Mediation, Online Activities, and Cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 2009, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 387–393.
  19. Olweus D. Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do? Oxford, UK; Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 1993. 140 p.
  20. Olweus D. Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon?. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2012, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1–19. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2012.682358
  21. Outcome evaluation results of school-based cybersafety promotion and cyberbullying prevention intervention for middle school students / A. Roberto et al. Health Communication, 2014, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1029-1042. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.831684
  22. Payne A.A., Hutzell K.L. Old wine, new bottle? Comparing inter-personal bullying and cyberbullying victimization. Youth & Society, 2017, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1149–1178.
  23. Peebles E. Cyberbullying: Hiding behind the screen. Paediatr Child Health, 2014, vol. 19, no. 10, pp.:527–528. doi: 10.1093/pch/19.10.527
  24. Protecting Children against Bullying and Its Consequences / I. Zych et al. Cham: Springer, 2017. 92 p. (Springer Briefs in Behavioral Criminology).
  25. Risk factors associated with cybervictimization in adolescence / D. Alvarez-Garcia et al. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 2015, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 226–235.
  26. Sampasa-Kanyinga H., Hamilton H.A. Use of social networking sites and risk of cyberbullying victimization: A population-level study of adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2015, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 704–710.
  27. John A. et al. Self-Harm, Suicidal Behaviours, and Cyberbullying in Children and Young People: Systematic Review. Journal of medical internet research, 2018, vol. 20, no. 4. e129. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9044
  28. Selkie E.M., Fales J.L., Moreno M.A. Cyberbullying Prevalence among US Middle and High School–Aged Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2016, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 125–133. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.026
  29. Chang E. et al. The mixed effects of online diversity training. PNAS, 2019, vol. 116, no. 16, pp. 778–783.
  30. Willard N. Cyber bullying and cyber threats: Responding to a challenge of online social cruelty, threats and distress. Champaign: Research Press, 2007. 311 p.
  31. Wright M.F., Li Y. The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: the moderating effect of peer rejection. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2013, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 662–674.
  32. Zhou Z., Tian Y., Wei H. Cyberbullying and its risk factors among Chinese high school students. School Psychology International, 2013, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 630–647.

Information About the Authors

Daria V. Kiriukhina, Chair of Legal Psychology and Law, Department of Legal Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID:, e-mail:



Total: 3126
Previous month: 24
Current month: 24


Total: 2318
Previous month: 26
Current month: 8