Unlocking Creative Productivity: A Talent Development Approach

In 2011, the authors published a synthesis of the psychological literature available in English related to giftedness, talent, eminence, high performance, and creativity. This synthesis led to the development of the Talent Development Megamodel, which is an evolving tool to promote policies and practices that support giftedness in domains such as academics, the arts, sport, and the professions. The model focuses on seven principles and has recently added an eighth. The principles include: (1) giftedness is malleable and manifested in domains; (2) opportunities must be offered to develop abilities into competencies, expertise, and sometimes eminence; (3) different domains begin, peak, and end at different times; (4) opportunities to develop talent must be offered inside of school, outside of school, and beyond the school years; (5) opportunities have to be taken by talented individuals; (6) mental skills like screening out distractions can be taught and become increasingly important in the talent development process; (7) social skills like being able to promote oneself tastefully become increasingly important in the talent development process; (8) if talent development and gifted education are to become more equitable, accessing insider knowledge associated with the process of talent development needs to be widely available to all schools and families.

1. Anderson R.K., Boaler J., Dieckmann J. Achieving elusive teacher change through challenging myths about learning: A blended approach. Education Sciences, 2018. Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–33. DOI:10.3390/educsci8030098
2. Olszewski-Kubilius P. et al. Benchmarking psychosocial skills important for talent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019. Vol. 168, pp. 161–176. DOI:10.1002cad.20318
3. Bloom B.J. Generalizations about talent development [Elektronnyi resurs]. In Bloom B.J. (ed.), Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books, 1985, pp. 507–549. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=wmDyDwAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&hl=ru&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false (Accessed 22.11.2021).
4. Conceptions of giftedness. R.J. Sternberg, J.E. Davidson (eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 479 p.
5. Ericsson K.A., Pool R. Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise [Elektronnyi resurs]. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2016. 336 p. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=GmcpCgAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&hl=ru&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false (Accessed 22.11.2021).
6. Fransen J., Gullich A. Talent identification and development in game sports. In Subotnik R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Worrell F.C. (eds.), The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2019, pp. 59–92. DOI:10.1037/0000120-002
7. Gladwell M. Outliers: The story of success. New York: Back Bay Books, Little, Brown and Company, 2008. 336 p.
8. Ifrah G. The universal history of numbers: From prehistory to the invention of the computer. New York: Wiley, 2000. 656 p.
9. Jarvin L., Subotnik R.F. Wisdom from conservatory faculty: Insights on success in music performance. Roeper Review, 2010. Vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 78–87. DOI:10.1080/02783191003587868
10. Krutetskii V.A. The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. University of Chicago Press, 1976. 417 p.
11. Lerchenmueller M.J., Sorenson O., Jena A.B. Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: Observational study. BMJ, 2019. Vol. 367, article ID, l6573, 9 p. DOI:10.1136/bmj.l6573
12. Libertus M.E., Feigenson L., Halberda J. Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. Developmental Science, 2011. Vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1292–1300. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01080.x
13. Olszewski-Kubilius P., Subotnik R.F., Worrell F.C. Aiming talent development toward creative eminence in the 21st Century. Roeper Review, 2016. Vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 140–152. DOI:10.1080/02783193.2016.1184497
14. Olszewski-Kubilius P., Subotnik R.F., Worrell F.C. The role of domains in the conceptualization of talent. Roeper Review, 2017. Vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 59–69. DOI:10.1080/02783193.2017.1247310
15. Portenga S.T. High performance talent development in golf. In Subotnik R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Worrell F.C. (eds.), The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent. American Psychological Association, 2019, pp. 23–58. DOI:10.1037/0000120-003
16. Reyes D.L, Salas E. What makes a team of experts an expert team? In Subotnik R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Worrell F.C. (eds.), The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2019, pp. 141–159. DOI:10.1037/0000120-007
17. Sternberg R.J. Giftedness as Developing Expertise: A theory of the interface between high abilities and achieved excellence. High Ability Studies, 2001. Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 159–179. DOI:10.1080/13598130120084311
18. Subotnik R.F. Talent developed: Conversations with masters in the arts and sciences. Eliot Feld. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2002. Vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 290–302. DOI:10.1177/016235320202500305
19. Subotnik R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Worrell F.C. Channeling gifted abilities into transformative creative productivity. In Sternberg R.J., Ambrose D., Karami S. (eds.), Transformational giftedness. Palgrave Macmillan. In press.
20. Subotnik R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Worrell F.C. Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2011. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3–54. DOI:10.1177/1529100611418056
21. Subotnik R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Worrell F.C. The relationship between expertise and giftedness: A talent development perspective. In Hambrick D.Z., Campitelli G., Macnamara B.N. (eds.), The science of expertise: Behavioral, neural, and genetic approaches to complex skill. New York, NY: Routledge, 2017, pp. 427–434. DOI:10.4324/9781315113371-25
22. Tannenbaum A.J. Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1983. 527 p.
23. Atkins M.S. et al. Teacher key opinion leaders and mental health consultation in low-income urban schools. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2008. Vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 905–908. DOI:10.1037/a0013036
24. Tsay C.J. Sight over sound in the judgment of music performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013. Vol. 110, no. 36, pp. 14580–14585. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1221454110
25. Wagner I. Producing excellence: The making of virtuosos [Elektronnyi resurs]. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2015. 336 p. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=TDqYCgAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&hl=ru&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false (Accessed 22.11.2021).
26. Watts T.W. et al. What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 2014. Vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 352–360. DOI:10.3102/0013189X14553660
27. Worrell F.C., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Subotnik R.F. The psychology of high performance: Overarching themes. In Subotnik R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Worrell F.C. (eds.), The psychology of high performance: Translating human potential into domain-specific talent. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2019, pp. 369–385. DOI:10.1037/0000120-018
28. Worrell F.C., Subotnik R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius P. Talent development: A path toward eminence. In Pfeiffer S. (eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2018, pp. 247–258. DOI:10.1037/0000038-016