The Best Possible Self Intervention: the diversity of formats and the equality of effectiveness



The Best Possible Self intervention includes thinking about one’s Best Possible Self and turns a person to a possible future in which all goals and desires have been successfully achieved in the best possible way. The format varies from just thinking, writing and visualization to any combination of three stages. However, the numerous changes made by the authors to the initial intervention instructions call into question the possibility of considering all variations as a single tool, rather than a multitude of techniques based on the phenomenon of the Best Possible Self. The purpose of this article is to critically analyze empirical studies on the effectiveness of intervention in all variations. The latest studies demonstrate the effectiveness of intervention on motivation, self-efficacy, assessment of one's competence, and perseverance in performing a difficult task, but these indicators are rarely addressed, and the results are preliminary. The positive effect on optimism and positive affect have been confirmed by the results of many studies, and in recent years there has been a tendency to expand the research field. Within the framework, it is necessary to fill the existing gaps in the study of the effectiveness of intervention, taking into account individual characteristics, i.e. personality traits, professional status and cultural aspects. Given the frequent practice of clarifying the Best Possible Self to a certain sphere of life or social role, it is necessary to pay closer attention to the diversity and specificity of these trends in order to successfully adapt it to the required task and expand the possibilities of practical application of an intervention with promising potential.

General Information

Keywords: positive psychology, interventions, Self-concept, Possible Self, Best Possible Self, well-being

Journal rubric: General Psychology

Article type: review article


Funding. The reported study was funded by Russian Science Foundation (RSF), project number 23-78-10174,

Received: 03.10.2023


For citation: Fevzieva A.A. The Best Possible Self Intervention: the diversity of formats and the equality of effectiveness [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2024. Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 109–117. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2024130110. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


  1. Leont'ev D.A. Novye orientiry ponimaniya lichnosti v psikhologii: ot neobkhodimogo k vozmozhnomu [New guidelines for understanding personality in psychology: from the necessary to the possible]. Voprosy psihologii [Questions of psychology], 2011. Vol. 1, pp. 3—27. (In Russ.)
  2. Epshtein M.N. Filosofiya vozmozhnogo [Philosophy of the possible]. St. Petersburg: Aleteiya, 2001. 334 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Boehm J.K., Lyubomirsky S., Sheldon K.M. A longitudinal experimental study comparing the effectiveness of happiness-enhancing strategies in Anglo Americans and Asian Americans. Cognition & Emotion, 2011. Vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1263—1272. DOI:10.1080/02699931.2010.541227
  4. Carrillo A., Etchemendy E., Baños R.M. My best self in the past, present or future: results of two randomized controlled trials. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2021. Vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 955—980. DOI:10.1007/s10902-020-00259-z
  5. Dierkes L. The Best Possible Self Intervention: the mediating effect of engagement with technology between the BPS future and past intervention and well-being: thesis dis. ... master of science. Enschede, 2021. 34 p.
  6. Duan S., Exter M., Newby T. Effect of best possible self writing activities on preservice teachers' attitudes towards technology integration. TechTrends, 2022. Vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 654—665. DOI:10.1007/s11528-022-00696-y
  7. Duan S., Watson S., Newby T. Novice instructional designers’ attitudes towards the best possible self activity and the correlation with personality and subjective well-being. TechTrends, 2022. Vol. 66, pp. 240—253. DOI:10.1007/s11528-021-00653-1
  8. Altintas E., Karaca Y., Moustafa A., El Haj M. Effect of best possible self intervention on situational motivation and commitment in academic context. Learning and Motivation, 2020. Vol. 69, article ID 101599. 7 p. DOI:10.1016/j.lmot.2019.101599
  9. Carrillo A., Rubio-Aparicio M., Molinari G., Enrique A., Sanchez-Meca J., Banos R.M. Effects of the best possible self intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 2019. Vol. 14, no. 9, article ID e0222386. 23 p. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0222386
  10. Gibson B., Umeh K.F., Newson L., Davies I. Efficacy of the Best Possible Self protocol in diabetes self-management: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Health Psychology, 2021. Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 332—344. DOI:10.1177/1359105318814148
  11. Fetterolf J.C., Eagly A.H. Do young women expect gender equality in their future lives? An answer from a possible selves experiment. Sex Roles, 2011. Vol. 65, pp. 83—93. DOI:10.1007/s11199-011-9981-9
  12. Gatzounis R., Meulders A. Pain and avoidance: The potential benefits of imagining your best possible self. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2022. Vol. 153, article ID 104080. 9 p. DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2022.104080
  13. Heekerens J.B., Eid M. Inducing positive affect and positive future expectations using the best-possible-self intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2021. Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 322—347. DOI:10.1080/17439760.2020.1716052
  14. Holmes S.G., McCarren H.M. Writing about one's best possible self to influence task persistence [Electronic resourсe]. Modern Psychological Studies, 2020. Vol. 25, no. 2, article ID 3. 14 p. URL: (Accessed 06.03.2024).
  15. Deck S., Semenchuk B., Hall C., Duncan L., Kullman S., Strachan S. How Best to Imagine: Comparing the Effectiveness of Physical Activity Imagery, Possible Self and Combined Interventions on Physical Activity and Related Outcomes. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 2023. Vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 244—262. DOI:10.1177/02762366221107883
  16. King L.A. The health benefits of writing about life goals. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 2001. Vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 798—807. DOI:10.1177/0146167201277003
  17. Peters M.L., Flink I.K., Boersma K., Linton S.J. Manipulating optimism: Can imagining a best possible self be used to increase positive future expectancies? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2010. Vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 204—211. DOI:10.1080/17439761003790963
  18. Manzi C., Vignoles V.L., Regalia C. Accommodating a new identity: Possible selves, identity change and well‐being across two life‐transitions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2010. Vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 970—984. DOI:10.1002/ejsp.669
  19. Markus H., Nurius P. Possible selves. American psychologist, 1986. Vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 954—969. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
  20. Meevissen Y.M.C., Peters M.L., Alberts H.J.E.M. Become more optimistic by imagining a best possible self: Effects of a two week intervention. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 2011. Vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 371—378. DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.02.012
  21. Mirhadi S. The Best Possible Self: Do Cultural Dimensions Effect Subjective Wellbeing?: dis. ... ph. d. London, 2020. 50 p.
  22. Duan S., Exter M., Newby T., Fa B. No impact? Long-term effects of applying the best possible self intervention in a real-world undergraduate classroom setting. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 2021. Vol. 4, pp. 581—601. DOI:10.1007/s42413-021-00120-y
  23. Jennings R.E., Lanaj K., Koopman J., McNamara G. Reflecting on one's best possible self as a leader: Implications for professional employees at work. Personnel Psychology, 2022. Vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 69—90. DOI:10.1111/peps.12447
  24. Sheldon K.M., Lyubomirsky S. How to increase and sustain positive emotion: The effects of expressing gratitude and visualizing best possible selves. The journal of positive psychology, 2006. Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 73—82. DOI:10.1080/17439760500510676
  25. Gibson B., Umeh K., Davies I., Newson L. The best possible self‐intervention as a viable public health tool for the prevention of type 2 diabetes: A reflexive thematic analysis of public experience and engagement. Health Expectations, 2021. Vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1713—1724. DOI:10.1111/hex.13311
  26. Boselie J.J., Vancleef L.M., van Hooren S., Peters M.L. The effectiveness and equivalence of different versions of a brief online Best Possible Self (BPS) manipulation to temporary increase optimism and affect. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2023. Vol. 79, article ID 101837. 6 p. DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101837

Information About the Authors

Anife A. Fevzieva, Research Assistant, School of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, HSE University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID:, e-mail:



Total: 57
Previous month: 11
Current month: 46


Total: 36
Previous month: 3
Current month: 33