Cogito Meliorem! In Search of Magical Ways to Facilitate Creativity

This paper presents a systematical review of facilitation techniques for creativity in general and insight solutions in particular. The facilitation techniques are fairly diverse, therefore we grouped them into nine categories: rest, attention management, impact of emotions, adding new context, physical activity, interactivity, future-thought priming, metacognitive training, and unusual techniques for increasing creativity. Each category is provided by a brief description and a set of studies that demonstrate possibilities and limitations of the techniques as well as an analysis and comparison of the techniques with each other. At the conclusion, we present a model of levels of creative solution facilitation based on four classical psychological levels. According to this model, influence on the solution can be carried out (1) through conscious strategies for managing the solution through metacognition; due to changes occurring in (2) cognitive and (3) emotional-motivational processes; (4) indirectly, due to changes in the external environment. We made a general conclusion about the variety of techniques that influence the creativity process, and most of them combine several possible facilitation mechanisms, making each technique more effective and applicable to various types of creative tasks.

1. Savinova A.D., Korovkin S.Y. Kak svyazany rabochaya pamyat' i izmenenie reprezentatsii: spetsificheskii i nespetsificheskii podkhod k insaitu [How are Working Memory and Representational Change Related: Specific and Non-Specific Approach to Insight]. Eksperimental'naya psikhologiya = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2023. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 36—56. DOI:10.17759/exppsy.2023160403 (In Russ.).
2. Patrick J., Ahmed A., Smy V., Seeby H., Sambrooks K. A cognitive procedure for representation change in verbal insight problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015. Vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 746—759. DOI:10.1037/xlm0000045
3. Truelove-Hill M., Erickson B.A., Anderson J., Kossoyan M., Kounios J. A growth-curve analysis of the effects of future-thought priming on insight and analytical problem-solving. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018. Vol. 9, article ID 1311. 9 p. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01311
4. Acosta G., Smith E., Kreinovich V. Why pink noise is best for enhancing sleep and memory: system-based explanation. Applied mathematical sciences, 2019. Vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 677—680. DOI:10.12988/ams.2019.9796
5. Chuderski A., Jastrzębski J., Kucwaj H. How physical interaction with insight problems affects solution rates, hint use, and cognitive load. British Journal of Psychology, 2021. Vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 120—143. DOI:10.1111/bjop.12442
6. Colzato L.S., Szapora Ozturk A., Hommel B. Meditate to create: the impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking. Frontiers in psychology, 2012. Vol. 3, article ID 116. 5 p. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00116
7. Craig M., Ottaway G., Dewar M. Rest on it: Awake quiescence facilitates insight. Cortex, 2018. Vol. 109, pp. 205—214. DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.09.009
8. Ovington L.A., Saliba A.J., Moran C.C., Goldring J., MacDonald J.B. Do people really have insights in the shower? The when, where and who of the Aha! Moment. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2018. Vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 21—34. DOI:10.1002/jocb.126
9. Förster J., Friedman R.S., Liberman N. Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2004. Vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 177—189. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.177
10. Henok N., Vallée-Tourangeau F., Vallée-Tourangeau G. Incubation and interactivity in insight problem solving. Psychological Research, 2020. Vol. 84, pp. 128—139. DOI:10.1007/s00426-018-0992-9
11. Huntsinger J.R., Clore G.L., Bar-Anan Y. Mood and global—local focus: Priming a local focus reverses the link between mood and global—local processing. Emotion, 2010. Vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 722—726. DOI:10.1037/a0019356
12. Vallée-Tourangeau F., Ross W., Ruffatto Rech R., Vallée-Tourangeau G. Insight as discovery. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2021. Vol. 33, no. 6—7, pp. 718—737. DOI:10.1080/20445911.2020.1822367
13. Jarosz A.F., Colflesh G.J.H., Wiley J. Uncorking the muse: Alcohol intoxication facilitates creative problem solving. Consciousness and Cognition, 2012. Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 487—493. DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2012.01.002
14. Jia L., Hirt E. R., Karpen S.C. Lessons from a faraway land: The effect of spatial distance on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009. Vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1127—1131. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.015
15. Kaufmann G., Vosburg S.K. “Paradoxical” mood effects on creative problem-solving. Cognition & Emotion, 1997. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 151—170. DOI:10.1080/026999397379971
16. Korovkin S., Savinova A. The effectiveness of metacognitive hints in insight problem solving. In Velichkovsky B.M., Balaban P.M., Ushakov V.L. (eds.), Advances in Cognitive Research, Artificial Intelligence and Neuroinformatics: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Cognitive Sciences, Intercognsci-2020 (g. Moscow, 10—16 October, 2020). Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 101—106. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-71637-0_11
17. Laue R., Danek A.H. An experiment on the impact of TRIZ-inspired thinking on solving insight problems. In Cavallucci D., Livotov P., Brad S. (eds.), Towards AI-Aided Invention and Innovation: 23rd International TRIZ Future Conference (g. Offenburg, 12—14 September, 2023): Proceedings. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023, pp. 417—425. DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-42532-5_32
18. Mehta R., Zhu R., Cheema A. Is noise always bad? Exploring the effects of ambient noise on creative cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 2012. Vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 784—799. DOI:10.1086/665048
19. Bianchi I., Branchini E., Canestrari C., Burro R. On pleasures of the mind related to humour and insight problem solving: An investigation of people’s awareness of what they like and why. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2022. Vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 778—795. DOI:10.1080/20445911.2022.2047058
20. Oppezzo M., Schwartz D.L. Give your ideas some legs: the positive effect of walking on creative thinking. Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition, 2014. Vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1142—1152. DOI:10.1037/a0036577
21. Orita R., Hattori M. Positive and negative affects facilitate insight problem‐solving in different ways: A study with implicit hints. Japanese Psychological Research, 2019. Vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 94—106. DOI:10.1111/jpr.12237
22. Miron-Spektor E., Efrat-Treister D., Rafaeli A., Schwarz-Cohen O. Others' anger makes people work harder not smarter: The effect of observing anger and sarcasm on creative and analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011. Vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1065—1075. DOI:10.1037/a0023593
23. Patterson R., Frith E., Loprinzi P.D. The experimental effects of acute walking on cognitive creativity performance. Journal of behavioral Health, 2018. Vol 7, no. 3, pp. 113—119. DOI:10.5455/jbh.20180415053930
24. Slepian M.L., Weisbuch M., Rutchick A.M., Newman L.S., Ambady N. Shedding light on insight: Priming bright ideas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2010. Vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 696—700. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.009
25. Debarnot U., Rossi M., Faraguna U., Schwartz S., Sebastiani L. Sleep does not facilitate insight in older adults. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2017. Vol. 140, pp. 106—113. DOI:10.1016/j.nlm.2017.02.005
26. Schönauer M., Brodt S., Pöhlchen D., Breßmer A., Danek A.H., Gais S. Sleep does not promote solving classical insight problems and magic tricks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2018. Vol. 12, article ID 72. 11 p. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00072
27. Lacaux C., Andrillon T., Bastoul C., Idir Y., Fonteix-Galet A., Arnulf I., Oudiette D. Sleep onset is a creative sweet spot. Science Advances, 2021. Vol. 7, no. 50, article ID eabj5866. 9 p. DOI:10.1126/sciadv.abj5866
28. Smith S.M., Beda Z. Old problems in new contexts: The context-dependent fixation hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2020. Vol. 149, no. 1, pp. 192—197. DOI:10.1037/xge0000615
29. Steffensen S.V., Vallée-Tourangeau F. An ecological perspective on insight problem solving. In Vallée-Tourangeau F. (ed.), Insight: On the Origins of New Ideas. London: Routledge, 2018, pp. 169—190. DOI:10.4324/9781315268118
30. Capezuti E., Pain K., Alamag E., Chen X., Philibert V., Krieger A.C. Systematic review: auditory stimulation and sleep. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2022. Vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1697—1709. DOI:10.5664/jcsm.9860
31. Sanders K.E., Osburn S., Paller K.A., Beeman M. Targeted memory reactivation during sleep improves next-day problem solving. Psychological science, 2019. Vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1616—1624. DOI:10.1177/0956797619873344
32. Zhou Z., Wu J., Luo H., Guo Y., Tu M., Yu Q., Zhang L. The effect of humor on insight problem-solving. Personality and Individual Differences, 2021. Vol. 183, article ID 111105. 7 p. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111105
33. Colzato L.S., Szapora Ozturk A., Pannekoek J.N., Hommel B. The impact of physical exercise on convergent and divergent thinking. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2013. Vol. 7, article ID 824. 6 p. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00824
34. Rummel J., Iwan F., Steindorf L., Danek A.H. The role of attention for insight problem solving: effects of mindless and mindful incubation periods. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2021. Vol. 33, no. 6—7, pp. 757—769. DOI:10.1080/20445911.2020.1841779
35. Van Stockum C.A., DeCaro M.S. Enclothed cognition and controlled attention during insight problem-solving. The Journal of Problem Solving, 2014. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 73—83. DOI:10.7771/1932-6246.1164
36. Wegbreit E., Suzuki S., Grabowecky M., Kounios J., Beeman M. Visual attention modulates insight versus analytic solving of verbal problems. The journal of problem solving, 2012. Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 94—115. DOI:10.7771/1932-6246.1127
37. Walinga J., Cunningham J.B., MacGregor J.N. Training insight problem solving through focus on barriers and assumptions. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2011. Vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 47—58. DOI:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01084.x
38. Seel S.V., Easton A., McGregor A., Buckley M.G., Eacott M.J. Walking through doorways differentially affects recall and familiarity. British Journal of Psychology, 2019. Vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 173—184. DOI:10.1111/bjop.12343
39. Wieth M.B., Zacks R.T. Time of day effects on problem solving: When the non-optimal is optimal. Thinking & Reasoning, 2011. Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 387—401. DOI:10.1080/13546783.2011.625663
40. Zedelius C.M., Schooler J.W. Mind wandering “Ahas” versus mindful reasoning: Alternative routes to creative solutions. Frontiers in psychology, 2015. Vol. 6, article ID 834. 13 p. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00834