Dostoevsky on Twitter: Twitterfiction as a Learning Tool in SLA

The article examines the benefits of twitterfiction, a relatively new form of literary production, as a means of second language acquisition in the context of recreational reading. Pushed forward by the influential American educational researcher Stephen Krashen, free voluntary reading (FVR) has been proven to be an extremely powerful factor in developing various aspects of second language competence and getting students committed to reading more. This paper attempts to evaluate both quantitative and qualitative complexity measures of twitterfiction as in the case of TWITTERATURE by Alexander Aciman and Emmett Rensin to better understand the educational potential of the above type of prose. Readability formulas such as the Gunning Fog index and the Coleman-Liau index are deployed to evaluate the structural complexity of the text. ‘Attentive reading’, being a subjective factor in many ways, is a tool we apply to assess the text on the levels of semantics and pragmatics. The research concludes that twitterfiction, as demonstrated in the book, is an adequate ESL supplementary material alongside comics, graphic novels and level 4 graded readers.

1. Bovshik A.S. Analogovaya i semioticheskaya reprezentatsii v aspekte lingvo-semioticheskogo analiza. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie= Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Philology. Art history, 2011. Vol 248, no. 33, pp. 222–224. Available at: http://www.lib.csu.ru/vch/248/vcsu11_33.pdf (Accessed: 10.02.2020). (In Russ.).
2. Bovshik A. S. Osobennosti polikodovogo postmodernistskogo diskursa (na materiale romanov D. Kouplenda “Generation X” i “Generation A”). Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk. 2012. Chelyabinsk, 21 s. (In Russ.).
3. Bodriiyar Zh. Prozrachnost' zla. 2000. Moscow: Dobrosvet, 258 p. (In Russ.).
4. Zenkevich I.V., Mikhailova A.E. Uchebnyi protsess v sovremennom VUZe: massovaya kul'tura i kriticheskoe myshlenie [The educational process in a modern university: mass culture and critical thinking]. Yazyk i tekst = Language and text, 2014. Vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1-6. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/langpsy/2014/n3/72256.shtml (Accessed: 28.02.2020) (In Russ.).
5. Zenkevich I.V. Sostoyanie rusistiki v SShA v XXI veke: mesto russkogo yazyka v sisteme amerikanskogo obrazovaniya [Russian studies in the USA in the XXI century: the Russian language in American education]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta= Tomsk state pedagogical university bulletin, 2017. Vol 184, no. 7, pp. 117-123. DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-7-117-123. (In Russ.).
6. Zenkevich I.V. Serbskaya romanticheskaya poema pervoi poloviny XIX veka [Serbian Romantic Poem of the First Half of XIX Century]. Problemy filologii: yazyk i literatura= Problems of Philology: Language and Literature, 2010, no. 2, pp. 27-32. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/files/33072/philology_2010_2_Zenkevich.pdf (Accessed: 28.02.2020). (In Russ.).
7. Kirsanov A.I. S. Khantington o "Stolknovenii tsivilizatsii" v kontekste global'nykh transformatsii. Filosofiya i obshchestvo= Philosophy and society, 2008. Vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 32-43. Available at: https://www.socionauki.ru/journal/articles/130197/ (Accessed: 10.02.2020). (In Russ.).
8. Kirsanov A.I. Narkomaniya i narkobiznes kak global'naya ugroza, 2008. Moscow: MGADA, 207 p. (In Russ.).
9. Makhmudova S.M. Frazeologicheskii slovar' rutul'skogo yazyka, 2016. Makhachkala: Epokha, 215 p. (In Russ.).
10. Mikk Ya.A. Metodika razrabotki formul chitabel'nosti. Sovetskaya pedagogika i shkola. Tartu: Publ. Tartu, 1974, no. 9, pp. 78–163. (In Russ.).
11. Oborneva I.V. Avtomatizirovannaya otsenka slozhnosti uchebnykh tekstov na osnove statisticheskikh parametrov. Dis. kand. ped. nauk. 2006. Moscow, 120 p. (In Russ.).
12. Aciman A., Rensin E. Twitterature: The World’s Greatest Books Retold Through Twitter, 2009. Oxford: Penguin books, 146 p.
13. Anderson R., Wilson P., Fielding L. Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school, 1988. Illinois: Research Quarterly, pp. 285–303.
14. Bowers K. Twitterature in the Dostoevsky Classroom. NYU Jordan Center for the Advanced Study of Russia, 2019. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: http://jordanrussiacenter.org/news/twitterature-in-the-dostoevsky-classroom/#.Xm0f_Xgue1s (Accessed 06.03.2020)
15. Coleman M., Liau T. L. A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975. Vol. 60, pp. 283–284.
16. Conrad J. The Secret Agent, 2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 84 p.
17. Krashen S. D. The Power of Reading: Insights from the Research, 2004. Devon: Libraries Unlimited, 214 p.
18. Morrow L., Weinstein С. Increasing children’s use of literature through program and physical changes. Elementary School Journal, 1982. Vol. 83, pp. 131–137.
19. Rudin M. From Hemingway to Twitterature: The Short and Shorter of It. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 2011. Vol. 14, Issue 2. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0014.213?view=text;rgn=main (Accessed: 06.03.2020)
20. Stone B. Black Boxes: On Reading Jennifer Egan’s Twitter Story. NC Magazine. Nonfiction, 2012. Vol. 3, no. 6. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: http://numerocinqmagazine.com/2012/06/20/black-boxes-on-reading-jennifer-egans-twitter-story-bruce-stone/ (Accessed 06.03.2020)
21. Tanaka-Ishii K., Tezuka K., Terada H. Sorting texts by readability. Computational Linguistics, 2010. Vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 203–227. Available at: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/J10-2002.pdf (Accessed 06.03.2020)
22. Wright G. The comic book: A forgotten medium in the classroom. Reading Teacher, 1979. Vol. 33, pp. 158–161.