Analysis of existing key layout models from the perspective of user adaptation

 
Audio is AI-generated
13

Abstract

Context and Relevance. Standard keyboard layouts (QWERTY, Dvorak, Colemak), despite various optimization attempts, remain fixed and do not account for individual user characteristics. This limits ergonomic efficiency and reduces typing comfort and performance. Modern touchscreen interface technologies enable a shift from universal layouts to fully customizable keyboards tailored to users' physiological, cognitive, and professional needs. Objective. To justify the necessity of transitioning to the concept of a fully customizable touchscreen keyboard and to present a user-adaptive layout model based on ergonomic and functional criteria. Hypothesis. A personalized key layout, designed according to frequency analysis, biomechanical principles, and individual user preferences, improves typing speed and accuracy while reducing fatigue, compared to universal keyboard schemes. Methods and Materials. A comparative analysis of existing layouts was conducted in terms of finger load distribution, effort allocation, and frequent typing patterns. The concept of manual configuration for touchscreen keyboards was substantiated, incorporating metrics such as finger movement distance, hand alternation, professional context, and multi-profile adaptability. Results. The proposed approach to user-defined layout design enables interface adaptation to individual needs, reducing motor strain, balancing input workload, and enhancing ergonomic efficiency without relying on automated optimization methods. Conclusions. A touchscreen keyboard with manual layout customization offers a promising solution for personalized input interfaces. A system of criteria is proposed for designing and evaluating user-specific input schemes. Future work may include the development of a formalized layout construction methodology and cross-device portability formats.

General Information

Keywords: touchscreen keyboard, personalized layout, typing ergonomics, adaptive interface, user layout modeling

Journal rubric: Short Messages

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/mda.2025150311

Received 04.08.2025

Revised 11.08.2025

Accepted

Published

For citation: Kolotovkin, I.S., Chernyshov, V.V. (2025). Analysis of existing key layout models from the perspective of user adaptation. Modelling and Data Analysis, 15(3), 172–179. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/mda.2025150311

© Kolotovkin I.S., Chernyshov V.V., 2025

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Юрьева Н. Е. Выбор и программная реализация методов визуализации данных клавиатурного почерка // Моделирование и анализ данных. – – Т. 7. – № 1. – С. 89–102.
    Yurieva N.E. Selection and software implementation of methods for visualizing keyboard typing data. Modelling and Data Analysis, 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 89–102. (In Russian)
  2. Лясковский М. А., Горячкин Б. С., Лещев А. О., Мельников К. И. Разработка метода оптимизации раскладки клавиатуры «ЙЦУКЕН» // Тенденции развития науки и образования. – 2020. – № 62-4. – С. 69–80. – DOI: 10.18411/lj-06-2020-84. – EDN: QTIHDK.
    Lyaskovsky M.A., Goryachkin B.S., Leshchev A.O., Melnikov K.I. Development of a method for optimizing the “YTsUKEN” keyboard layout. Trends in Science and Education, 2020, no. 62-4, pp. 69–80. DOI: 10.18411/lj-06-2020-84. (In Russian)
  3. Серый М. С. Сравнение эффективности различных раскладок клавиатуры // Стимулирование научно-технического потенциала общества в стратегическом периоде: сб. ст. по итогам Междунар. науч.-практ. конф., Ижевск, 3 февр. 2024 г. – Стерлитамак: Агентство международных исследований, – С. 103–107. – EDN: TFMBFJ.
    Sery M.S. Comparison of the efficiency of various keyboard layouts. In: Stimulating the Scientific and Technical Potential of Society in the Strategic Period: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Izhevsk, February 3, 2024. Sterlitamak: Agency of International Research, 2024, pp. 103–107. (In Russian)
  4. Зубачев А. В. Эволюционированная раскладка клавиатуры. – М.: Логос, – 256 с.
    Zubachev A.V. The Evolved Keyboard Layout. Moscow: Logos, 2015. 256 p. (In Russian)
  5. Черненко Н. В. Раскладка Зубачева: эффективность и удобство // Информатика и разработка. – 2017. – № 2. – С. 42–50.
    Chernenko N.V. The Zubachev layout: efficiency and convenience. Informatics and Development, 2017, no. 2, pp. 42–50. (In Russian)
  6. Белов Д. С. Сравнительный анализ раскладок клавиатур для русскоязычного текста // Информационные технологии и компьютерные системы: материалы конф. – 2019. – С. 112–118.
    Belov D.S. Comparative analysis of keyboard layouts for Russian-language text. In: Information Technologies and Computer Systems: Conference Proceedings, 2019, pp. 112–118. (In Russian)
  7. Сидоров В. К. Анализ распределения нагрузки на пальцы при использовании различных раскладок клавиатуры // Эргономика и дизайн. – 2021. – Т. 10. – № 2. – С. 23–32.
    Sidorov V.K. Analysis of finger load distribution using different keyboard layouts. Ergonomics and Design, 2021, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 23–32. (In Russian)
  8. Petrova E.A. Study of keyboard layout efficiency based on statistical data. Doctoral dissertation. Moscow State University, 2020. 180 p. (In Russian)

Information About the Authors

Igor S. Kolotovkin, Junior Researcher, Center for Information Technologies for Psychological Research, Moscow State University of psychology and education (MSUPE), Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6126-4849, e-mail: is@kolotovkin.pro

Vladimir V. Chernyshov, Student, Moscow State University of psychology and education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1389-1710, e-mail: vovachern18@list.ru

Contribution of the authors

The authors contributed equally to the research, data analysis, and preparation of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 90
Previous month: 41
Current month: 8

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 13
Previous month: 4
Current month: 1

 Total

Whole time: 103
Previous month: 45
Current month: 9