Inclusion in Culturological Perspective

2616

Abstract

The necessity of introducing culturogical perspective while setting goals for the inclusive education and evaluation of its capabilities is addressed in the article. In the process of education and mentoring the people with disabilities it is important to take into account their specific cultural needs. Recognition of the special cultural needs imply the description of the particular system of relationships, the identification systems, the specificity of the constituent elements of cultural environment adequate for people with disabilities, emphasizing the importance of a reference group as a condition of human development, searching for the language of communication, both for internal needs of this group and for communication with other groups. The need to revise the prevailing concepts of culture in contemporary theory and practice of inclusion is justified towards a more productive use of cultural knowledge in the process of creating a developmental learning environment. The possibilities of cultural forms, which can be found in the arsenal of traditional cultures and artistic practices of contemporary art are discussed in creating supportive social and cultural environment that promotes inclusion and integration of people with disabilities.

General Information

Keywords: inclusive education, people with disabilities, specific cultural needs, paradigms of cultural psychology

Journal rubric: Perspectives of Inclusive Education

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Shemanov A.Yu., Popova N.T. Inclusion in Culturological Perspective. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2011. Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 74–82. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Lich E. Kul'tura i kommunikacija: Logika vzaimosvjazi simvolov: k ispol'zovaniju strukturnogo analiza v social'noj antropologii. M., 2001.
  2. Moss M. Fizicheskoe vozdejstvie na individa kollektivno vnushennoj mysli o smerti (Avstralija, Novaja Zelandija) // Moss M. Obshestva. Obmen. Lichnost': Trudy po social'noj antropologii. M., 1996.
  3. Obuhova L. F., Dvornikova I. N. Ritualy kak psihologicheskoe sredstvo formirovanija splochennosti sem'i // Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie. 2008. № 4.
  4. Popova N. T. Kul'turologicheskie aspekty razvivajushej pedagogiki // Postizhenie kul'tury. Ezhegodnik. Vyp. 11. M., 2001.
  5. Popova N. T. Kul'turnye mehanizmy razvitija cheloveka (kul'turnaja forma, kul'turnyj deficit, subkul'tura) // Teoreticheskaja kul'turologija. Ser. «Jenciklopedija kul'turologii». M.-Ekaterinburg, 2005.
  6. Popova N. T. Na puti k teatru. Subkul'tura. Integracija. Teatr s uchastiem ljudej s intellektual'noj nedostatochnost'ju // Proteatr. Fenomen «osobogo iskusstva» i sovremennaja kul'tura (s prilozheniem reestra «osobyh teatrov»). M., 2008.
  7. Romanov P. V., Jarskaja-Smirnova E. R. Politika invalidnosti: Social'noe grazhdanstvo invalidov v sovremennoj Rossii. Saratov, 2006.
  8. Sanson P. Psihopedagogika i autizm: opyt raboty s det'mi i vzroslymi. M., 2006.
  9. Terner V. Simvol i ritual. M., 1983.
  10. Sherbakova A. M., Shemanov A. Ju. Diskussionnye voprosy razvitija lichnosti rebenka s intellektual'noj nedostatochnost'ju // Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie. 2010. № 2.
  11. Glavenue V. P. Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology // New Ideas in Psychology. Vol. 28. Issue 1. April 2010.
  12. Hershenson D. B. Toward a cultural anthropology of disability and rehabilitation // Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 43:3. 2000.
  13. Hickey-Moody A. ‘Turning away’ from Intellectual Disability: Methods of Practice, Methods of Thought // Melbourne Studies in Education, 2003. V. 44. № 1.
  14. Klotz J. The Culture Concept: Anthropology, disability studies and intellectual disability // Disability Studies and Research Institute (DSaRI) Symposium. 12.9.2003.
  15. Mesibov G. Evidence-Based Practice and Autism // Meeting of Minds 3 / February 2009.
  16. Mesibov G. What is TEACCH?

Information About the Authors

Alexey Y. Shemanov, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Special Psychology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Clinical and Special Psychology, Leading Researcher, Scientific Laboratory of the Federal Center for the Development of Inclusive General and Additional Education, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3925-3534, e-mail: shemanovayu@mgppu.ru

Natalya T. Popova, Senior Researcher, Laboratory on Problems of Socio-Cultural Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities, Institute of Problems of Integrative (Inclusive) Education, MSUPE, Moscow, Russia

Metrics

Views

Total: 3301
Previous month: 27
Current month: 16

Downloads

Total: 2616
Previous month: 14
Current month: 2