Educational programs of support of the gifted in universities

The article examines the problems of gifted learners caused by lack of intellectual challenge in case of undifferentiated education in universities and difficulties in relationships with peers who have another system of values. It analyzes the honors programs in American universities which are aimed at solution of these problems. It identifies the elements of the programs, their effectiveness, influence on personal and professional growth of the gifted. Early entrance program (13–14 years) for gifted students is examined, the postponed results of its influence. The article identifies the main characteristics of the programs which can be used in Russian universities for fuller self-realisation of the gifted.

1. Anan'ev B. G. O problemah sovremennogo chelovekoznanija. M., 1977.
2. Petrova N. I. Dinamika samoaktualizacii u studentov tvorcheskih special'nostej // Voprosy psihologii.2005. № 1.
3. Rubcov V. V., Zhuravlev A. L., Margolis A. A., Ushakov D. V. Obrazovanie odarennyh – gosudarstvennaja problema // Psihologicheskaja nauka I obrazovanie. 2009. № 4.
4. Smirnov S. D. Psihologicheskie faktory uspeshnoj ucheby studentov vuza. Elektronnaja versija: www.psy.msu.ru/science/public/smirnovstudents.html ,2010.
5. Brody L. T., Muratori M. E. & Stanle J. C. Earlyentrance to college: Academic, social, and emotional considerations. In: N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline,& M. U.M. Gross (Eds.) A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Centre for Gifted Education and Talent Development, 2004.
6. Daniel L., & Digby J. Selling people on honors education. National Honors report. 2002. № 23 (1).
7. Denk W. J. Honors as a recruiting magnet //Metropolitan Universities: An International Forum.1998. № 9 (2).
8. Gerrity D. A., Lawence J. F., & Sedlacek W. E. Hohors and nonhonors freshmen: Demographics, attitudes, interests, and behaviors. NACADA Journal. 1993. № 13 (1).
9. Heber T. P., & McBee M. T. The Impact of an Undergraduate Honors Program on Gifted University Students // Gifted Child Quarterly. 2007.Vol. 51 (2).
10. Hertzog Nancy. Impact of Gifted Programs from the Students’ Perspectives // Gifted Child Quarterly.2003. Vol. 47.
11. Long A. Honors microcosm of the urban research university // Metropolitan Universities.1998. № 9 (2).
12. Mack M. These things called honors programs //Liberal Education. 1996. № 82 (2).
13. Malaney G. D., Isaac P. D. The immediate postbaccalaureat educational plans of outstanding undergraduates // College and University. 1988.№ 63 (2).
14. Mathiasen R. E. Characteristics of the collegehonors student // J. of College Student Personnal.1996. № 26 (2).
15. Noble K. D., Vaughan R. C., Chan Ch., Childers S., Chow B., Federow A., Hughes S. Love and Work: The Legacy of Early University Entrance // Gifted Child Quarterly. 2007. Vol. 51 (2).
16. Olszewski-Kubilius Paula. A summary of research regarding early entrance to college //Roeper Review. 1995. Vol. 18.
17. Rinn Anne N. Effects of Programmatic Selectivity on the Academic Achievement, Academic Self-Concepts, and Aspirations of Gifted CollegeStudents // Gifted Child Quarterly. 2007. Vol. 51 (3).
18. Rinn Anne N., & Plucker J. A. We recruit them, but then what? The educational and psychological experiences of academically talented undergraduates// Gifted Child Quarterly. 2004. Vol. 48 (1).
19. Steinhaur L. Results from the SMACOHOP Survey of Small College Honors Programs: Part 4 //National Honors Report. 2002. № 23 (2).
20. Thistlethwaite D. L., Wheeler N. Effects of teacherand peer subcultures upon student aspiration //Journal of Educational Psychology. 1966. № 57 (1).