Study-Related Experiences and Their Association with Psychological Well-Being

The paper presents an analysis of empirical data on relationship of study-related learning experiences with students’ psychological well-being and academic success.The data were obtained using the original Activity-Related Experiences Assessment technique (AREA) and a number of additional measures.The results of four studies are presented.The first one was devoted to the psychometric validation of AREA questionnaire.The results confirmed the construct validity of the model of activity-related experiences.The second study compared experiences associated with different types of activities (study and leisure).Differences in the structure of correlations of experiences related to different activities confirmed that experiences are activity-related rather than personality-related.The third study presents data on the relationship of study-related experiences with personality traits and academic performance.Only the experience of pleasure revealed a significant association with academic performance.The purpose of the last study was identifying the structure and reliability of AREA on the combined sample by CFA using and checking the connection of study-related experiences with indicators of psychological well-being.Experiences of pleasure and meaning were closely related to each other and negatively related to the experience of void, while the experience of effort was hardly associated the other three scores.Experiences of pleasure and meaning reveal predictable direct (and the experience of void the reverse) association with indicators of well-being.

1. Gervits A.E., Leontiev D.A.Perezhivaniya v odinochestve i v kompanii v zavisimosti ot otnosheniya k odinochestvu [Experiences in solitude and in the company depending on the attitude to loneliness].In Solov’eva O.V.(eds.), Innovatsionnye resursy sotsial’noi psikhologii: teorii, metody, praktiki: Sbornik nauchnykh rabot [Innovative resources of social psychology: theories, methods, practices: Collection of scientific papers], Moscow, 2017, pp.409—414.
2. Leontiev D.A.Test smyslozhiznennykh orientatsii (SZhO) [Noetic orientations test].Moscow: Smysl, 1992, 18 p.
3. Leontiev D.A.Perezhivaniya, soprovozhdayushchie deyatel’nost’, i ikh diagnostika.[Activity-related experiences, and their assessment].In Baturin N.A.(ed.), Sovremennaya psikhodiagnostika Rossii. Preodolenie krizisa. Sbornik materialov Tret’ei Vserossiiskoi konferentsii po psikhologicheskoi diagnostike (9— 11 sentyabrya 2015 g.) [Modern psychodiagnostics of Russia. Overcoming the crisis. Proceeding of the Third All-Russian Conference on Psychological Diagnostics]. Chelyabinsk: Publ.YuUrGU, 2015.Vol.1, pp.175—179.
4. Leontiev D.A.Samoregulyatsiya, resursy i lichnostnyi potentsial [Self-regulation, resources and personality potential].Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Siberian Psychological Journal], 2016, no.4(62), pp. 18—37.doi: 10.17223/17267080/62/3
5. Leontiev D.A., Klein K.G.Kachestvo motivatsii i kachestvo perezhivanii kak kharakteristiki uchebnoi deyatel’nosti [The quality of motivation and the quality of experiences as characteristics of educational activities].Vestnik Mosk. Un-ta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya [The Moscow University Herald. Series 14. Psychology], 2018, no.4, pp.106—119.doi: 0.11621/vsp.2018.04.106
6. Osin E.N.Izmerenie pozitivnykh i negativnykh emotsii: razrabotka russkoyazychnogo analoga metodiki PANAS [Measurement of positive and negative emotions: development of the Russian-language analogue of the PANAS method]. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 2012.Vol.9, no.4, pp. 91—110.
7. Osin E.N., Leontiev D.A.Aprobatsiya russkoyazychnykh versii dvukh shkal ekspress-otsenki sub”ektivnogo blagopoluchiya [Approbation of Russian versions of two scales for express assessment of subjective well-being].Materialy Tret’ego Vserossiiskogo sotsiologicheskogo kongressa [Proceeding of the Third All-Russian Sociological Congress]. Moscow: Institut sotsiologii RAN, Rossiiskoe obshchestvo sotsiologov, 2008.[Elektronnyi resurs] Available at: http://www.isras.ru/ abstract_bank/1210190841.pdf (Accessed: 26.11.2018).
8. Osin E.N., Leontiev D.A.Diagnostika perezhivanii v professional’noi deyatel’nosti: validizatsiya metodiki [Assessment of experiences in professional activities: validation of the method].Organizatsionnaya psikhologii [Organizational psychology], Vol.7, no.2, pp. 30—51.
9. Osin E.N., Rasskazova E.I., Neyaskina Yu.Yu., Dorfman L.Ya., Aleksandrova L.A.Operatsionalizatsiya pyatifaktornoi modeli lichnostnykh chert na rossiiskoi vyborke [Operationalization of the five-factor personality trait model in the Russian sample].Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika [ Psychological accessment], 2015, no.3, pp.80—104.
10. Chiksentmikhaii M.Potok: psikhologiya optimal’nogo perezhivaniya [Flow: the psychology of optimal experience].Moscow: Smysl; Al’pina Non- Fikshn, 2011, 464 p.(In Russ.).
11. Shvartser R., Erusalem M., Romek V.Russkaya versiya shkaly obshchei samoeffektivnosti R.Shvartsera i M.Erusalema [The Russian version of general self-efficacy scale of R.Schwarzer and M.Erusalem].Inostrannaya psikhologiya [Inostrannaya psikhologiya], 1996, no.7, pp.71—76.
12. Csikszentmihalyi M.The flow experience and its significance for human psychology In Csikszentmihalyi M.(eds.), Optimal Experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp.15—35.doi: 10.1017/ CBO9780511621956.002
13. Csikszentmihalyi M., Nakamura J.Emerging goals and the self-regulation of behavior.In R.Wyer (ed.), Advances in social cognition. Perspectives on behavioral self-regulation.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1999.Vol.12, pp. 107—118.doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_13
14. Nakamura J., Csikszentmihalyi M.The construction of meaning through vital engagement.In Keyes C.L.M.(eds.), Positive psychology and the life well-lived.Washington D.C.American Psychological Association, 2003, pp.83—104.doi: 10.1037/10594-004