Experiences in Different Activities: Temporal Dynamics and Construct Validity

1069

Abstract

This study aims to clarify the methodological status of the category “activity experience”. A sample of the study consists of first-year students of a Moscow university. Study 1 (N = 104) attended by respondent aged 17 to 28 years (M = 18.30; SD = 1.40), 82% are female, and in study 2 (N = 93), aged 17 to 28 20 years old (M = 18.02; SD = 0.61), 55% are female. Study 2 includes three measurements of activity-related experiences with an interval of 10—15 days. We use the Activity-Related Experience Assessment (AREA), the Universal Perceived Locus of Causality Scale (UPLOC), the Responsibility Scale, and a brief version of the Psychological Health Continuum. The results of the study demonstrate that the activity-related experiences are neither personality traits, that are inherent in the individual regardless of situations, nor emotional states that change over time. Evidence of reliability, construct validity and criterion validity of the Activity-Related Experiences Assessment Scale is given. The measure of academic success is better predicted not by those experiences that are manifested during study activities, but those that arise along on the way to university. There is a slight effect of the influence of time on the measure of effort.

General Information

Keywords: activity-related experience, quality of motivation, self-determination theory, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, academic motivation

Journal rubric: Developmental Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2019240505

Funding. This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant № 16-18-10439.

For citation: Klein K.G., Leontiev D.A., Kostenko V.Y., Osin E.N., Taranenko O.A., Kosheleva N.V. Experiences in Different Activities: Temporal Dynamics and Construct Validity. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2019. Vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 47–57. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2019240505. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Gervits A.E., Leont’ev D.A.Perezhivaniya v odinochestve i v kompanii v zavisimosti ot otnosheniya k odinochestvu [Experience in loneliness and in the company depending on the attitude to loneliness].In Solov’eva O.V.(eds.), Innovatsionnye resursy sotsial’noi psikhologii: teorii, metody, praktiki: Sbornik nauchnykh rabot [Innovative resources of social psychology: theories, methods, practices: Collection of scientific papers]. Moscow, 2017, pp.409—414.
  2. Leont’ev D.A.Perezhivaniya, soprovozhdayushchie deyatel’nost’, i ikh diagnostika [The experiences that accompany the activity and their diagnosis].In Baturin N.(eds.), Sovremennaya psikhodiagnostika Rossii: Preodolenie krizisa: sbornik materialov III Vserossiiskoi konferentsii po psikhologicheskoi diagnostike: v 2 t. T. 1. [Modern psychodiagnostics of Russia: Overcoming the crisis: a collection of materials from the III All-Russian conference on psychological diagnostics: in 2 vol. Vol. 1.].Chelyabinsk: Publ.YuUrGU, 2015, pp.175—179.
  3. Leont’ev D.A.Samoregulyatsiya, resursy i lichnostnyi potentsial [Self-regulation, resources and personal potential].Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal [ Siberian psychological journal], 2016, no.62, pp.18—37.(In Russ).
  4. Leont’ev D.A., Klein K.G. Kachestvo motivatsii i kachestvo perezhivanii kak kharakteristiki uchebnoi deyatel’nosti [The quality of motivation and the quality of experiences as characteristics of educational activity].Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14: Psychology], 2018, no.4, pp.106—119.(In Russ, Abstr.in Engl).doi:10.11621/vsp.2018.04.106
  5. Leont’ev D.A.[i dr.] Perezhivaniya v uchebnoi deyatel’nosti i ikh svyaz’ s psikhologicheskim blagopoluchiem [Experiences in educational activities and their relationship with psychological well-being].Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological science and education], 2018.Vol.23, no.6, pp.55—66.(In Russ., abstr in Engl).
  6. Osin E.N., Leont’ev D.A.Diagnostika perezhivanii v professional’noi deyatel’nosti: validizatsiya metodiki [Diagnosis of experiences in professional activity: method validation].Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya [Organizational psychology], 2017.Vol.7, no.2, pp. 30—51.(In Russ).
  7. Chikszentmikhalyi M.Potok: psikhologiya optimal’nogo perezhivaniya [Flow: Psychology of The Optimal Experience].Moscow: Publ.Smysl; Al’pina Non-Fikshn, 2011.460 p.
  8. Gagné M.et al.The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries.European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 2015.Vol.24, pp.178—196.
  9. Ryan R.M., Connell J.P.Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989.Vol.57, pp.749—761.
  10. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L.Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic de nitions and new direction.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2000.Vol.25, no.1, pp.54—67.doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  11. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L.Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.The American psychologist, 2000.Vol. 55, pp.68—78.doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  12. Sheldon K.M.et al.Evaluating the dimensionality of Self-Determination Theory’s relative autonomy continuum.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2017.Vol.43, no.9, pp.1215—1238.
  13. Sheldon K.M.et al.Freedom and Responsibility Go Together: Personality, Experimental, and Cultural Demonstrations.Journal of Research in Personality, 2018.Vol.73, no.1, pp.63—74.
  14. Vansteenkiste M., Lens W., Deci E.Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation.Educational Psychologist, 2006.Vol.41, no.1, pp.19— 31.doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
  15. Żemojtel-Piotrowska M.et al.The Mental Health Continuum — Short Form: The structure and application for cross-cultural studies — a 38 nation study.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2018.Vol.74, no.6, pp.1034—1052.

Information About the Authors

Konstantin G. Klein, Research Assistant, International Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2762-158X, e-mail: kleinme@mail.ru

Dmitriy A. Leontiev, Doctor of Psychology, Leading Research Fellow, The Laboratory for Comparative Research in Quality of Life, National Research Tomsk State University, Head of International Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation; Professor of Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Psychology, HSE University, Moscow, Tomsk, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-9805, e-mail: dmleont@gmail.com

Vasily Y. Kostenko, PhD in Psychology, Senior Research Fellow, International Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5612-3857, e-mail: vasily.kostenko@gmail.com

Evgeny N. Osin, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Deputy Head of the International Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3330-5647, e-mail: eosin@hse.ru

Olga A. Taranenko, Master, Research Assistant, International Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: otaranenko@hse.ru

Natalia V. Kosheleva, Ph.D. Student, Research Fellow, International Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: nkocheleva@hse.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1404
Previous month: 23
Current month: 28

Downloads

Total: 1069
Previous month: 16
Current month: 27