Representations of Teachers and Elder Schoolchildren about the Risks of Interacting with the Internet

The paper explores the notions of risks on the Internet in teachers and high school students. The study was carried out on a sample of teachers (n = 294) and school students of 9—11 grades (n = 180) using the analysis of social representations (Abric coefficient).The results confirmed that only a small part (5 out of 29) of the teachers’ notions about the riskiness of Internet communication is related to the use of the Internet; mostly they are based on some general ideas concerning risk behaviours in adolescents. At the same time, the teachers were not quite ready to cooperate with their colleagues to help reduce such risks: only 41.5% of the teachers showed readiness, given that they receive appropriate training. The study confirmed that the notions of risks associated with the active use of the Internet differ significantly in teachers and students, which can be explained by at least two reasons. Firstly, by the fact that the active use of the Internet does not affect the subjective well-being of the adolescents. Secondly, by the fact that for high school students, the Internet is a natural tool and a necessary attribute of their daily life, whereas, according to the outcomes of our study, only 20% of the teachers believe that they have the necessary skills to freely use the Internet as a means of their teaching activities. For the rest of the teachers, the Internet is still an object that must be mastered and treated as a source of threats and risks to the psychological development of schoolchildren.

1. Aysina R.M., Nesterova A.A. Cyber socialization of youth in the information and communication space of the modern world: effects and risks.Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2019.Vol.10, no.4, pp.42—57.DOI:10.17759/ sps.2019100404.(In Russ.)
2. Bovina I.B.Theory of social representations: the history and modern development.Journal of Sociology, 2010, no.3, pp.5—20.(In Russ.)
3. Bovina I.B., Dvoryanchikov N.V., Budykin S.V.Information security of children in lay thinking of parents and teachers.Vestnik RUDN.Seriya “Psikhologiya i pedagogika”, 2016, no.1, pp.77—86.(In Russ.)
4. Bovina I.B., Dvoryanchikov N.V., Gayamova S.YU., Milekhin A.V., Budykin S.V.Sotsial’nyye predstavleniya i informatsionnaya bezopasnost’ detey i podrostkov: tochka zreniya uchiteley (Chast’ 1) [Social representations of information security of children and adolescents: teachers’ point of view (Part1)] [Elektronnyi resurs].Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and law, 2017.Vol. 7, no.1, pp.1—12.DOI:10.17759/psylaw.2017070101.(In Russ.)
5. Budykin S.V., Dvoryanchikov N.V., Bovina I.B.Information Security of Children and Adolescents According to Parents and Teachers (Part 2: The Results of an Empirical Study).[Elektronnyi resurs].Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and law, 2016.Vol.6, no.1, pp. 25— 38.DOI:10.17759/psylaw.2016060104.(In Russ.)
6. Voiskunsky A.E.Do children addicted to computer games become more aggressive? Voprosy Psychologii, 2010, no.6, pp.133—143.(In Russ.)
7. Emelyanova T.P.Konstruirovanie sotsial’nykh predstavleniy v usloviyakh transformatsii rossiyskogo obshchestva [Construction of social representations in the context of the transformation of Russian society].Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS, 2006.(In Russ.)
8. Voyskunskij A.Ye.Internet-zavisimost’: psikhologicheskaya priroda i dinamika razvitiya.Moscow: Akropol’, 2009.279 p.(In Russ.)
9. Informacionnye i kommunikacionnye tekhnologii v obrazovanii [Information and communication technologies in education: monograph].Badarch of Dendev — Moscow: UNESCO IITE, 2013.320 p.URL: https://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/ru/ files/3214728.pdf (accessed: 10.05.2020).(In Russ.)
10. Klenova M.A.Sotsial’nye predstavleniya o riske [Social Representation of Risk].Izv. Sarat. Univ. (N.S.), Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2011.Vol.11, iss.2, pp.58—62.(In Russ.).
11. Lidskaya E.V., Mdivani M.O.Subject-Environment Interactions with Television and the Internet in the Context of Traditional and Modern Gender Representations.Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2017.Vol.22, no.4, pp.110—119.DOI:10.17759/ pse.2017220415.(In Russ.).
12. Patrakov E.V.Adolescents and the Internet: Reactions of Parents.Sibirskiy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal = Siberian journal of psychology, 2019, no. 72, pp.129—144.DOI: 10.17223/17267080/72/7.(In Russ.).
13. Patrakov E.V.Predstavleniya pedagogov, roditelej i starshih shkol’nikov o riskah interneta dlya podrostkov [Presentations by educators, parents, and high school students about Internet risks for adolescents] // Ekopsihologicheskie issledovaniya-6: ekologiya detstva i psihologiya ustojchivogo razvitiya / otv.red.V.I.Panov.M.: FGBNU «Psihologicheskij institut RAO», Kursk: Universitetskaya kniga, 2020.P. 482—486.(In Russ.).
14. Soldatova G.U., Rasskazova E.I., Nestik T.A.Tsifrovoe pokolenie Rossii: kompetentnost’ i bezopasnost’ [Digital generation of Russia: competence and safety].Moscow: Smysl, 2017.375 р.(In Russ.).
15. Soldatova G., Rasskazova E.Parental unawareness about online risks in adolescence: revalence and psychological factors.Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2019.Vol.40 (1), pp.71—83.DOI: 10.31857/ S020595920002251-2.(In Russ.).
16. Zhuravlev A.L.[i dr.].Sotsialno-psikhologicheskaya otsenka riskov sovremennoy realnosti: ochevidnoye i veroyatnoye: monografiya.Belobrykinoy O.A.(ed.).Novosibirsk: NGPU.2017.113 p.(In Russ.).
17. Soldatova G., Zotova E., Chekalina A., Gostimskaya O.Caught by one network: a socio-psychological study of the views of children and adults about the Internet.Moscow, 2011.(In Russ.).
18. Tolstykh N.N., Ter-Avanesova N.V., Chernyak N.A.Social Representations About School and Learning in Different Groups of Participants of the Educational Process.Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2019.Vol.24, no. 6, pp.5—15.DOI: 10.17759/pse.2019240601.(In Russ.).
19. Shpagina E.M., Chirkina R.V.Competence of Teachers and Psychologists in the Field of Information Security of Children [Elektronnyi resurs].Psikhologiia i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2019.Vol.9, no.3, pp. 261—277.DOI:10.17759/psylaw.2019090319.(In Russ.).
20. Abric J-C.A structural approach to social representations.In Deaux K (eds.).Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions.Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2001, pp.42—47.
21. Guo G.A.Meta-Analysis of the Predictors of Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization.In Psychology in the Schools.Psychology in the School, 2016.Vol.53, no.4.
22. Moscovici S.La Psychanalyse: Son image et son public.2ème ed.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1976.
23. Panov V.I.From Environmental Psychology to Subject-Environment Interactions.Proceedings of the 2017 Second International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities.Part of the series ASSEHR.Moscow.2017.Vol.124, pp.1135— 1139.DOI: 10.2991/iccessh-17.2017.265.