Invariant and Variant Sociopsychological Characteristics of Successful Foster Mothers

As part of the development of tools for sociopsychological assessment of prospective foster parents, we conducted a factorization of the array of data obtained with a set of diagnostic techniques and identified the contribution of each component to the success of foster care. Invariant and variant characteristics of successful foster mothers are highlighted (N=128).Foster mothers were selected based on the expert opinion of the professional community and trained as coaches of foster families. It is shown that successful foster mothers have a number of characteristics that allow them to raise foster children over a long period of time. These characteristics should be considered as criteria for selecting potential reliable guardians. Among the invariant characteristics are: the viability of family, the dominance of motivation of altruism and self-realization in children, high levels of emotion management, extroversion, consciousness, emotional stability, parental competence. The variant characteristics are as follows: the experience of foster parenting, the intensity of motivation aimed at resolving family and personal crises, ‘replacing’ a child, solving demographic problems, filling an empty nest, as well as the level of emotional intelligence and its components (except emotion managment); personality traits (level of compliance, openness to experience); altruistic investment. The invariant-variant approach enables us to address the sociopsychological portrait of the foster mother in its integrity.

1. Al’truisticheskoe investirovanie kak netvorking-strategiya lichnosti: razrabotka shkaly i proverka konstruktnoi validnosti [Altruistic investing as a networking strategy of personality: development of a scale and verification of constructive validity].Mararitsa L.V., Kazantseva T.V., Pochebut L.G., Sventsitskii A.L.Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social psychology and society, 2019.Vol.10, no.3, pp.157— 176.DOI:10.17759/sps.2019100310 (In Russ.).
2. Bocharov V.A., Knyazev G.G., Mitrofanova L.G.Validizatsiya russkoyazychnoi versii oprosnika L. Goldberga «Markery faktorov “Bol’shoi pyaterki”» [Validation of the Russian version of the L.Goldberg questionnaire «Markers of the “Big Five” factors»] [Elektronnyi resurs].Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2010.Vol.31, no.5, pp. 100— 110.Available at: http://arxiv.gaugn.ru (Accessed 21.10.2021).(In Russ.).
3. Gusarova E.S., Odintsova M.A., Sorokova M.G.Shkala otsenki zhiznesposobnosti sem’i: adaptatsiya na rossiiskoi vyborke [Family viability assessment scale: adaptation on the Russian sample] [Elektronnyi resurs].Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological research], 2021.Vol.14, no.77, p.4.Available at: http:// psystudy.ru (Accessed 24.10.2021).(In Russ.).
4. Egorova M.S., Sitnikova M.A., Parshikova O.V.Adaptatsiya Korotkogo oprosnika Temnoi triady [Adaptation of the Short Questionnaire of the Dark Triad] [Elektronnyi resurs].Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological research], 2015.Vol.8, no.43, p.1.Available at: http://psystudy.ru (Accessed 24.10.2021).(In Russ.).
5. Kotova T.E.Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie i lichnostnye kharakteristiki gotovnosti k zameshchayushchemu roditel’stvu [Socio-psychological and personal characteristics of readiness for substitute parenting].Avtopef.diss.kand.psikhol.nauk.[Structure and dynamics of the intellectual abilities.PhD (Psychology) Thesis].Yaroslavl’, 2011.27 p.(In Russ.).
6. Kuftyak E.V.Zhiznesposobnost’ sem’i: teoriya i praktika [Family viability: theory and practice] [Elektronnyi resurs].Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal [Medical Psychology in Russia], 2014, no.5(28).Available at: http://mprj.ru (Accessed 21.10.2021).(In Russ.).
7. Lyusin D.V., Ovsyannikova V.V.Svyaz’ emotsional’nogo intellekta i lichnostnykh chert s nastroeniem [The relationship of emotional intelligence and personality traits with mood].Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology], 2015.Vol.12, no.4, pp.154—164.(In Russ.).
8. Makhnach A.V.Zhiznesposobnost’ zameshchayushchei sem’i kak maloi sotsial’noi gruppy [Viability of the substitute family as a small social group].Diss.dokt.psikhol.nauk.[Structure and dynamics of the intellectual abilities.Dr.Sci.(Psychology) diss.].Moscow, 2019.434 p.(In Russ.).
9. Makhnach A.V., Prikhozhan A.M., Tolstykh N.N.Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika kandidatov v zameshchayushchie roditeli: Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo [Psychological diagnostics of candidates for substitute parents].Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2013.219 p.(In Russ.).
10. Makhnach A.V., Tolstykh N.N.Zhiznesposobnost’ kak kharakteristika sotsial’noi gruppy kandidatov v zameshchayushchie roditeli [Viability as a characteristic of a social group of candidates for substitute parents].Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social psychology and society, 2018.Vol.9, no.2, pp.127— 149.DOI:10.17759/sps.2018090209 (In Russ.).
11. Motivatsionnaya modal’nost’ kak prognosticheskaya kharakteristika psikhologicheskoi gotovnosti k zameshchayushchemu roditel’stvu [Motivational modality as a prognostic characteristic of psychological readiness for substitute parenting].Boenkina E.A., Krasnoryadtseva O.M., Shcheglova E.A., Bredun E.V.Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Siberian Psychological Journal], 2020, no.75, pp.144—158.DOI:10.17223/17267080/75/8 (In Russ.).
12. Oslon V.N.Zhizneustroistvo detei-sirot: professional’naya zameshchayushchaya sem’ya: monografiya [The life of orphans: a professional substitute family].Moscow: Genezis, 2006.368 p.(In Russ.).
13. Oslon V.N.Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po primeneniyu metodik i tekhnologii psikhologicheskogo testirovaniya kandidatov v zameshchayushchie roditeli [Methodological recommendations on the application of methods and technologies of psychological testing of candidates for substitute parents].In Sem’ya G.V.(ed.).Moscow: Ministerstvo obrazovaniya i nauki Rossiiskoi Federatsii, Tsentr razvitiya sotsial’nykh proektov, 2013.180 p.(In Russ.).
14. Oslon V.N.Organizatsionnaya model’ psikhosotsial’nogo soprovozhdeniya zameshchayushchei sem’I [Organizational model of psychosocial support of a substitute family] [Elektronnyi resurs].Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological science and education, 2015.Vol.7, no.2.Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/files/76974/ psyedu_2015_n2_Oslon.pdf (Accessed 24.10.2021).(In Russ.).
15. Oslon V.N.Psikhodiagnostika stanovleniya identifikatsii v zameshchayushchei sem’e [Psychodiagnostics of the formation of identification in a substitute family].Vestnik Sankt—Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University], 2010, no.3, pp.55—64.(In Russ.).
16. Palieva N.A., Savchenko V.V., Solomatina G.N.Motivatsiya prinyatiya priemnogo rebenka v zameshchayushchuyu sem’yu [Motivation for the adoption of a foster child in a substitute family].  Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie [Society. Wednesday. Development], 2011, no.1(18), pp.132—137.(In Russ.).
17. Saporovskaya M.V. Mezhpokolennyi koping v sem’e: sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy i gruppovye effekty [Intergenerational coping in the family: socio-psychological mechanisms and group effects].Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological research], 2016.Vol.9, no.49, p.3.(In Russ.).
18. Andrea M.Jones, Tracy L.Morri.Psychological Adjustment of Children in Foster Care: Review and Implications for Best Practice.Journal of Public Child Welfare, 2012.Vol.6, no.2, pp.129—148.DOI:10.1080 /15548732.2011.617272
19. Aneesh Thadathil, Sujata Sriram.Divorce, Families and Adolescents in India: A Review of Research.Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 2020.Vol.61, no.1, pp.1—21.DOI:10.1080/10502556.2019.1586226
20. Brian J.Taylor, Karen McQuillan.Perspectives of Foster Parents and Social Workers on Foster Placement Disruption.Child Care in Practice, 2014.Vol.20, no.2, pp.232—249.DOI:10.1080/13575279.2013.859567
21. Characteristics of successful foster families according to Flemish foster care workers / Van Holen, Lynn Geys, Delphine West, Laura Gypen, Johan Vanderfaeillie.Children and Youth Services Review, 2019.Vol.107, no.3.DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104519
22. Child development in foster family care — what really counts? / Taru Kekoni, Janissa Miettinen, Niina Häkälä, Anssi Savolainen.European Journal of Social Work, 2019.Vol.22, no.1, pp.107—120.DOI:10.1080/ 13691457.2017.1357023
23. Cultivating Resilience in Families Who Foster: Understanding How Families Cope and Adapt Over Time / Cynthia A.Lietz, Francie J.Julien-Chinn, Jennifer M.Geiger, Megan Hayes Piel.Family Process, 2016.Vol.55, no.4.DOI:10.1111/famp.12239
24. Examining Depression, Anxiety, and Foster Care Placement as Predictors of Substance Use and Sexual Activity in Adolescents / Sarah B.Stevens, Chad S.Brice, Chelsea M.Ale, Tracy L.Morris.Journal of Social Service Research, 2011.Vol.37, no.5, pp.539—554.DOI:10.1080/01488376.2011.608338
25. Examining risk, strengths, and functioning of foster families: Implications for strengths-based practice / Francie J.Julien-Chinn, Katie L.Cotter, Megan Hayes Piel, Jennifer M.Geiger.Journal of Family Social Work, 2017.Vol.20, no.4, pp.306—321.DOI:10.1080/10522 158.2017.1348111
26. «Fostering» Effective Foster Parent Training Programs: Parent-Child Interaction Therapy Adaptations for the Child Welfare Setting / Robin C.Han, Christopher K.Owen, Corey C.Lieneman, Cheryl B.McNeil.The Open Family Studies Journal, 2020.Vol.12, no.1, pp. 10—17.DOI:10.2174/1874922402012010010
27. Helen Saarnik.A Systematic Review of Factors Needed for Successful Foster Placements: Perspectives from Children and Foster Parents.Child & Youth Services, 2021.Vol.42, no.3.DOI:10.1080/014593 5X.2021.1926227
28. Joanne Riebschleger, Angelique Day, Amy Damashek.Foster Care Youth Share Stories of Trauma Before, During, and After Placement: Youth Voices for Building Trauma-Informed Systems of Care.Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 2015.Vol.24, no. 4, pp.339—360.DOI:10.1080/10926771.2015.1009603
29. Keolebogile Betty Mosimege, Frederik Snyders.The psychological experiences of foster mothers of adolescent children.Journal of Psychology in Africa, 2018.Vol.28, no.2, pp.152—156.DOI:10.1080/14330 237.2018.1455305
30. Megan Miranda, Eman Tadros, Elizabeth Molla.The Experience of Foster Care and Long-Term Attachment.The American Journal of Family Therapy, 2020.Vol.48, no.1, pp.87—106.DOI:10.1080/01926 187.2019.1679053
31. Melanie Randle.Through the Eyes of Ex-Foster Children: Placement Success and the Characteristics of Good Foster Carers.Practice, 2013.Vol.25, no.1, pp. 3—19.DOI:10.1080/09503153.2013.775236
32. Sixbey M.T.Development of the family resilience assessment Scale to identify family resilience constructs [Elektronnyi resurs]: PhD thesis.Gainesville: University of Florida, 2005.171 p.Available at: http:// etd.fcla.edu/UF/UFE0012882/sixbey_m.pdf (Accessed 21.10.2021).
33. The Association Between Parent-Child Conflict and Adolescent Conduct Problems Over Time: Results From a Longitudinal Adoption Study / Klahr A.M., McGue M., Iacono W.G., Burt S.A.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2010.Vol.120, no.1, pp.46—56.DOI:10.1037/ a0021350
34. The Association Between Perception of Relationship with Caregivers and Behaviors of Youth in Foster Care: A Child and Caregiver Perspective / Morgan Cooley, Armeda Stevenson Wojciak, Heather Farineau, Ann Mullis.Journal of Social Work Practice, 2015.Vol.29, no. 2, pp.205—221.DOI:10.1080/02650533.2014.933405