On the Personality, Neurobiology, and Cognition of Creativity

This article describes the major results from investigations of the neuropsychology, personal ity, and cognition of creativity. Extreme groups, high and low in creativity were selected by the Creative Functioning Test (CFT). They were tested on anxiety and defense mechanisms. Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured during three tasks: Automatic speech, word fluency (FAS), and unusual uses (Brick). The high creative group had more anxiety, more projection, and higher defense sum, than the low creative group. Defense sum was positively correlated with CFT fluency. Differences between groups were found in all prefrontal regions, when blood flows during FAS and during Brick were compared. The high creative group had bilateral increases, or no change, while the low creative group had decreases. The results were discussed in terms of higher basal arousal in creative people, a creative defensive style, and interactions between complementary brain areas.

1. Bogen J.E., Bogen G.M. The other side of the brain III: The corpus callosum and creativity // Bull. of the Los Angeles Neurological Societies.1969. 34. P. 191-203.
2.   Bond M.P. The development and properties of the Defense Style Questionnaire // H.R. Conte and R. Plutchik (eds.). Ego Defenses. Theory and measurement.. New York: Wiley, 1995. P. 202-220.
3.   Brjesson, Gamberale, Kihlman, Santes$ son. DELTA-batteriet. Stockholm: Skandinaviska Testfцrlaget, 1970.
4.   Carlsson I. Lateralization of defence mechanisms related to creative functioning // Scand. J. of Psychol. 1990. 31. P. 241-247.
5.   Carlsson I. Anxiety and flexibility of defense related to high or low creativity // Creativity Res. J. 2002. 14 (3-4). P. 341-349.
6.   Carlsson I., Wendt P.E. Risberg J. On the neurobiology of creativity // Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects. Neuropsychologia. 2000. 38. P. 873-885.
7.   Eysenck H.J. Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
8.   Guilford J.P., Christensen P.R., Merrifield P.R., Wilson R.C. Alternate uses. Manual of instruction and interpretation. Orange, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services, 1978.
9.   Ingvar D.H., Risberg J. Increase of regional cerebral blood flow during mental effort in normals and in patients with focal brain disorders // Exp. Brain Res. 1967. 3. P. 195-211.
10.   Katz A.N. The relationships between creativity and cerebral hemisphericity for creative architects, scientists, and mathematicians // Empirical Studies of the Arts. 1986. 4. P. 97-108.
11.   Kragh U., Smith G.J.W. (eds.) Perceptgenetic analysis. Lund, Sweden: Gleerups, 1970.
12.   Martindale C. Cognition and Consciousness. Homewood, IL.: Dorsey, 1981.
13.   Martindale C., Hines D. Creativity and cortical activation during creative, intellectual, and EEG feedback tasks // Biol. Psychol. 1975. 3. P. 71-80.
14.   Martindale C., Hines D., Mitchell L., Covello E. EEG alpha asymmetry and creativity // Pers. and Ind. Diff. 1984. 5. P. 77-86.
15.   Kris E. Psychoanalytical explorations in art. New York: Int. Universities Press, 1952.
16.   Smith G.J.W., Carlsson I. The creative process. Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 57. Madison, C.: Int. Univ. Press, 1990.
17.   Smith G.J.W., Carlsson I. CFT: The creative functioning test. Lund, Sweden: Dep. of Psychol, Lund Univ., 2000.
18.   Smith G.J.W., Danielsson A. Richness in ideas, ego‑involvement and efficiency in a group of scientists and humanists: A study of creativity using a process-oriented technique. Psychol. Res. Bull. 18 (4-5), Lund, Sweden: Dep. of Psychol, Lund Univ., 1978.
19.   Smith G.J.W., Johnson G., Almgren P$E, Johanson A. MCT - the meta contrast technique. Lund, Sweden: Dep. of Psychol., Lund Univ., 2001.
20.   Spielberger C.D. Manual for the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983.
21.   Wechsler D. The WAIS‑R manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation,1981.
22.   Zangwill O.L. Psychological deficits associated with frontal lobe lesions // Int. J. of Neurol. 1966. 5. P. 395-402.