Theological idea of personality in modern Orthodox psychology

2012

Abstract

By writing the article the author pursued two main aims: firstly, to show, what is the benefit of Orthodox personalism and for what reasons the usage of theological concept of personality in modern Orthodox psychology seems helpful and fruitful; secondly, to prevent typical mistakes which often occur among psychologists who use the Orthodox theological notion of personality. To that end such questions as correlation and interconnection between notions of “personality” and “hypostasis”, “personality” and “nature”, “personality” and “individual”, “personality” and “consciousness”. “personality” and “image of God’ were discussed. The author thinks that an adequate formulation of the notion of “personality” in Orthodox theology and psychology demands clarification of patristic terminology - understanding of personality as the irreducibility to nature and being-in-communication and love. Such understanding has as its consequences the following characteristics of personality: possession of nature and underivability of consciousness from natural being.

General Information

Keywords: Orthodox psychology, personalism, personality theology. hypostasis, individual, consciousness, irreducibility to nature, being as communication.

Journal rubric: Psychology of Religion

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Kovshov M.V. Theological idea of personality in modern Orthodox psychology [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru [Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru], 2011. Vol. 3, no. 3 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Zahariya (Zaharu), arhim. Hristos kak put' nashei zhizni. Vvedenie v bogoslovie starca Sofroniya (Saharova). M., 2003.
  2. Ioann Damaskin, prep. Tochnoe izlozhenie pravoslavnoi very // Tvoreniya prepodobnogo Ioanna Damaskina. Istochnik znaniya. M., 2002.
  3. Ioann Damaskin, prep. Hristologicheskie i polemicheskie traktaty. Slova na Bogorodichnye prazdniki. M., 1997.
  4. Ioann (Ziziulas), mitr. Pergamskii. Bytie kak obshenie: Ocherki o lichnosti i Cerkvi. M., 2006.
  5. Kiprian (Kern), arhim. Antropologiya svt. Grigoriya Palamy. M., 1996.
  6. Leonov V., ierei. Vzaimosvyaz' ponyatii «obraz Bozhii» i «lichnost'» v sovremennom pravoslavnom bogoslovii // Puti promysla Bozhiya i svyatootecheskoe nasledie: Sbornik dokladov XVI Mezhdunarodnyh Rozhdestvenskih obrazovatel'nyh chtenii «Pravoslavnye cennosti i sovremennoe obrazovanie» (2008). Vyp. 2. M., 2009.
  7. Losskii V.N. Bogoslovskoe ponyatie chelovecheskoi lichnosti // Bogovidenie / Sost. A.S.Filonenko. M., 2003.
  8. Malkov P.Yu. Ipostas': lichnost' ili individuum? (K voprosu o prisutstvii v svyatootecheskom nasledii smyslovyh analogov ponyatiya «lichnost'») // Malkov P.Yu. Po obrazu Slova: Stat'i. M., 2007.
  9. Chursanov S.A. Licom k licu. Ponyatie lichnosti v pravoslavnom bogoslovii XX veka. M., 2008.
  10. Yurchenko A., diakon. Filosoficheskie i feologicheskie opyty. M., 1991.

Information About the Authors

Mikhail V. Kovshov, PhD in Theology, Teacher, chair of biblical studies, the Moscow Orthodox clerical academy, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: blazhenm@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 3363
Previous month: 17
Current month: 8

Downloads

Total: 2012
Previous month: 1
Current month: 2