The Models of Relationship between Training and Psyche development in Cultural-historical and Activity Approaches

812

Abstract

The possibility of referring of the psychological theories studying interrelation of training and mental development processes to this or that stage of scientific knowledge formation on the basis of studied objects types and corresponded determination systems as a basic criterion distinguishing the ideals of scientific rationality is justified. General characteristics of classical, non-classical and post-non-classical models, determination of the mechanisms of dissipative systems, requirements for learning and development model building in the context of post-non-classic science paradigm on the criterion of the system features of the object of cognition are described. Domestic psychological school models are compared with associanism, behaviorism, gestalt psychology and Piaget determination models on the number of options allocated to these determinants, types of causal chains and types of links between causal chains. It is shown that cultural-historical approach is situated intermediately between post-non-classical and non-classical models, while activity approach corresponds to post-non-classical understanding of the object of study as complicated self-developing "man-size" system. Determination relationships models developed by L.V.Vygotskii, S.L. Rubinstein, A.N. Leont’ev continue to play the heuristic role at the present stage of scientific development.

General Information

Keywords: the cultural-historical approach, activity approach, interrelation of training and mentality development, classical, non-classical, pos-tnon-classical models of determination

Journal rubric: Psychology of Education

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2016080302

For citation: Pogozhina I.N. The Models of Relationship between Training and Psyche development in Cultural-historical and Activity Approaches [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru [Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru], 2016. Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 16–31. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2016080302. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Asmolov A.G. Istoricheskiismyslkrizisakul'turno-deyatel'nostnoipsikhologii [The historical meaning of the crisis of the cultural activity psychology]. Natsional'nyipsikhologicheskiizhurnal [National psychological Journal], 2014, no 1, pp. 5-19.
  2. Asmolov A.G., Gusel'tseva M.S. Komu i kakrazrabatyvat' metodologiyupsikhologii? [Whom and how is to develop the methodology of psychology?]. Sibirskiipsikhologicheskiizhurnal[Siberian journal of psychology], 2015, no 55, pp. 6–45.
  3. Barybin A.A., Korlyakov A.V. Neravnovesnayatermodinamika [Non-equilibriumthermodynamics]. Saint-Petersburg: Pabl. GETU «LETI», 2011. 153 p.
  4. Brushlinskii A.V. Printsipdeterminizma v trudakh S.L. Rubinshteina [The principle of determinism in the works of S.L. Rubinstein]. Voprosypsikhologii [Issuesofpsychology], 1989, no 4, pp. 66-73.
  5. Vygotskii L.S. Lektsiipopedologii [Lectures on pedology]. Izhevsk: Pabl. «Udmurtskiiuniversitet», 2001. 303 p.
  6. Vygotskii L.S. Sobraniesochinenii: V 6 t. T. 1. Voprosyteorii i istoriipsikhologii [Collected Works: in 6 vol. Vol.1.Questions of theory and history of psychology]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1982. 488 p.
  7. Vygotskii L.S. Sobraniesochinenii: V 6 t. T. 3. Problemyrazvitiyapsikhiki [Collected Works: in 6 vol. Vol.3. Problems of development of the mind]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983. 368 p.
  8. Gusel'tseva M.S. Kul'turno-analiticheskiipodkhod k izucheniyuevolyutsiipsikhologicheskogoznaniya. Diss. dokt. psikhol. nauk [Cultural-analytical approach to the study of the evolution of psychological knowledge. Dr. Sci. (Psychology) diss.]. Moscow, 2015. 459 p.
  9. Il'yasov I.I. O problemnykhtochkakhdeyatel'nostnogopodkhoda: tekstovyefragmentyizdoklada [About problematic points of the activity approach: text excerpts from the report] [Elektronnyiresurs]. Materialymetodologicheskogoseminarapoproblemamdeyatel'nostnogopodkhoda v psikhologii. Seminar 2 (29 sentyabrya 2006) [Proceedings of the methodological seminar on the problems of the activity approach in psychology. Workshop 2 (29 September 2006)]. URL: http://www.psy.msu.ru/science/seminars/activity/materials/02_ilyasov.pdf (Accessed 12.11.2015).
  10. Il'yasov I.I. Strukturaprotsessaucheniya [The structure of the teaching process]. Moscow: Pabl. MGU, 1986. 200 p.
  11. Klochko V.E. Postneklassicheskayanauka i problemaob"yasneniya v psikhologii [Postnonclassical science and the problem of explanation in psychology]. Metodologiya i istoriyapsikhologii [Methodology and History of Psychology], 2008, 3, vol. 1, pp. 165-178.
  12. Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Sinergetikakaknovoemirovidenie: dialog s I.Prigozhinym [Synergetics as a new vision of the world: dialogue with I. Prigogine]. VoprosyFilosofii [Issuesofphilosophy], 1992, no12, pp. 3-20.
  13. Kornilova T.V., Smirnov S.D. Metodologicheskieosnovypsikhologii: uchebnik [Methodological bases of psychology]. 2-e izd. Moscow: Pabl. Yurait, 2011. 483 p.
  14. Lektorskii V.A. Epistemologiyaklassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya [Epistemology classical and nonclassical]. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2001. 256 p.
  15. Leont'ev A.N. Izbrannyepsikhologicheskieproizvedeniya: V 2 t. T. I [Selected psychological works: in 2 vol. Vol. I]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983. 392 p.
  16. Leont'ev A.N. Izbrannyepsikhologicheskieproizvedeniya: V 2 t. T. II [Selected psychological works: in 2 vol. Vol. II]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983. 320 p.
  17. Leont'ev A.N. O formirovaniisposobnostei [On the formation of abilities]. Voprosypsikhologii [Issuesofpsychology], 1960, no 1, pp. 7-17.
  18. Leont'ev D.A. Neklassicheskiivektor v sovremennoipsikhologii [Non-classical vector in modern psychology]. Postneklassicheskayapsikhologiya [Postnonclassical psychology], 2005, no. 1, pp. 74-94.
  19. Mamardashvili M.K. Klassicheskii i neklassicheskiiidealyratsional'nosti [Classical and non-classical ideals of rationality]. Saint-Petersburg: Pabl. Azbuka, 2010. 288 p.
  20. Nikolis G., Prigozhin I. Samoorganizatsiya v neravnovesnykhsistemakh: Otdissipativnykhstruktur k uporyadochennosticherezfluktuatsii [Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems: From dissipative structures for ordering through fluctuations]. Moscow: Mir, 1979. 512 p. (In Russ.).
  21. StepinV.S. (eds.)Novaya filosofskayaentsiklopediya: V 4 t. T. 3. [New Encyclopedia of Philosophy]. Moscow: Mysl', 2010. 692 p.
  22. Vyakkerev F.F. (eds.)Ob"ektivnayadialektika [The objective dialectic]. Moscow: Mysl', 1981. 374 p.
  23. Pogozhina I.N. Determinatsiyarazvitiyapoznavatel'nykhstruktur: postneklassicheskayateoreticheskaya model' [Determination of cognitive development: postnonclassical theoretical model]. Natsional'nyipsikhologicheskiizhurnal [National Psychological Journal], 2015, no. 3(19), pp. 35-44.
  24. Prigozhin I. Filosofiyanestabil'nosti [Instability Philosophy]. Voprosyfilosofii[Issues of philosophy], 1991, no 6, pp. 46-57.
  25. Rubinshtein S.L. Bytie i soznanie [Being and consciousness]. Moscow: Pabl. AN SSSR, 1957. 328 p.
  26. Rubinshtein S.L. Osnovyobshcheipsikhologii: V 2 t. T. 1 [Fundamentals of General Psychology: in 2 vol. Vol. I].  Moscow: Pedagogika, 1989. 488 p.
  27. Rubinshtein S.L. Printsipy i putirazvitiyapsikhologii [The principles and ways of development of psychology]. Moscow: Pabl. AN SSSR, 1959. 356 p.
  28. Rubinshtein S.L. Chelovek i mir [Man and the world]. Moscow: Nauka, 1997. 192 p.
  29. SachkovYu.V. K sintezu paradigm (kontseptsii) zhestkoideterminatsii i veroyatnostnoideterminatsii [The synthesis paradigms (concepts) rigid determination and probabilistic determination]. Filosofiyanauki. Vyp. 7: Formirovaniesovremennoiestestvennonauchnoi paradigm [Philosophy of Science. Vol. 7: Formationofmodernnaturalscienceparadigm], 2001, pp. 148-175.
  30. Stepanishchev A.F. Stanovleniepostneklassicheskoifilosofii v aspektekontseptsiideterminizma: Monografiya [Becoming postnonclassical philosophy in the aspect of the concept of determinism: Monograph]. Bryansk: BGTU, 2004. 240 p.
  31. Stepin V.S. Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika: kriteriirazlicheniya [Classical, neklassika, postneklassika: distinguishing criteria]. Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul'tura [Postneklassika: philosophy, science, culture]. Saint-Petersburg: Izdatel'skiidom «Mir"», 2009, pp. 249-295.
  32. Stepin V.S. Nauchnayaratsional'nost' v tekhnogennoikul'ture: tipy i istoricheskayaevolyutsiya [Scientific rationality in technogenic culture: types and historical evolution]. Voprosyfilosofii [Issues of philosophy], 2012, no. 5, pp. 18-25.
  33. Chernikova I.V. Tipologiyanauki v kontekstesovremennoifilosofiinauki [Typology of science in the context of contemporary philosophy of science]. Voprosyfilosofii [Issuesofphilosophy], 2011, no 11, pp. 71-78.
  34. Shvyrev V.S. O sootnosheniipoznavatel'noi i proektno-konstruktivnoifunktsii v klassicheskoi i sovremennoinauke [On the relation between cognitive and structural design and functions in classical and modern science]. In Lektorskii V.A. (ed.) Poznanie, ponimanie, konstruirovanie [Knowledge, understanding, designing]. Moscow: IFRAN, 2007, pp. 30-47.
  35. El'konin D.B. Izbrannyepsikhologicheskie Trudy [Selected psychological works]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1989. 560 p.

Information About the Authors

Irina N. Pogozhina, Doctor of Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology of Education and Pedagogics, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: pogozhina@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 2243
Previous month: 16
Current month: 7

Downloads

Total: 812
Previous month: 8
Current month: 4