Deontological aspects of perceiving people with disabilities in the context of contemporary culture

788

Abstract

The article analyzes the problem of negative influence of the mass culture on value orientations of a modern person when the corporality is idealized. The priority of the visual principle in the mass culture of the XXth – beginning of XXIst centuries changes the human relation to his/her own and someone else's body, because the visual is inextricably linked to the reproduction of uniform idealized visual images, as well as to defining static social and cultural human roles judging just by the physical body condition (when positive characters often have an idealized appearance, and embossed body contours while negative ones have physical limitations). The desire and, at the same time, the inability to attain a perfect body condition becomes one of the significant reasons for social and cultural tension when a growing negative attitude towards people with disabilities is detected. In order to overcome the social tension, specific solutions are required. That makes it actual to appeal to deontology (a science about what must be done, aimed at the moral renewal of society). Ethical and deontological culture, pedagogical, environmental and social deontologies are of great importance as these are developing a concept of new system of values destined to overcome social and personal contradictions. The work is carried out with support of Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation № 05.043.11.0025.

General Information

Keywords: people with disabilities, deontology, deontological culture, corporality, body culture, ideal, mass culture, social tension

Journal rubric: Clinical and Special Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2017090113

For citation: Shmeleva N.V., Babaeva A.V. Deontological aspects of perceiving people with disabilities in the context of contemporary culture [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru [Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru], 2017. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 125–134. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2017090113. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Alekhina S. V. Printsipy inklyuzii v kontekste razvitiya sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Principles of inclusion in the context of development of modern education]. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2014, no. 1, pp. 5–16. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  2.  Garsiya D. O ponyatiyakh «kul'tura» i «tsivilizatsiya» [The concepts of «culture» and «civilization»]. Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy], 2002, no. 12, pp. 228–234.  (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  3.  Gartman N. Etika [Ethic]. Medvedeva Yu. S., Sklyadneva D. V. (eds.). St. Petersburg: Fond Universitet: Vladimir Dal', 2002. 707 p. (In Russ.).
  4.  Karakhanova G.A. Formirovanie nravstvennoi kul'tury budushchego uchitelya na urovne vuzovskoi podgotovki. Avtoref. diss. dok. ped. nauk. [Formation of moral culture of the future teacher at high school preparation. Ph. D. (Pedagogy) Thesis]. Moscow, 2007. 27 p.
  5.  Levitan K.M. Osnovy pedagogicheskoi deontologii [Basics of pedagogical ethics]. Moscow: Nauka, 1994. 192 p. (In Russ.).
  6.  Matviichuk A.V. Filosofskie osnovaniya ekologicheskoi deontologii [The philosophical foundation of environmental ethics]. Vestnik moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta im. M.A.Sholokhova. Sotsial'no-ekologicheskie tekhnologii [Bulletin of the Moscow State Humanitarian University. Sholokhov. Social and environmental technology], 2013, no. 1, pp. 25–35. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  7.  Sukovataya V. Drugoe telo: invalid, urod i konstruktsii dizabiliti v sovremennoi kul'turnoi kritike [Another Body: The Invalid, the Ugly and “Disability” Coinages in Contemporary Cultural Criticism]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas: debaty o politike i kul'ture [NZ: Debates on Politics and Culture], 2012, no. 3 (83), pp. 73–98. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  8. Fuko M. Zabota o sebe. Istoriya seksual'nosti [The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality]. Kiev: Dukh i litera; Grunt; Moscow: Refl-buk. 1998. 288 p. (In Russ.).
  9.  Hell D. Landshaft depressii [Spezialgebiet Depression]. Moscow: Aleteiya. 1999. 280 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Shapinskaja E.N. Obraz Drugogo v tekstah kul'tury: politika reprezentacii (nachalo) [The Image of the Other in the Texts of Culture: the Policy of Representation ]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill], 2009, no 3, pp. 51–56. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  11.  Shevchenko A.A. Sotsial'naya deontologiya: problemy postroeniya [Social Deontology: Problems of Construction]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya [Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy], 2010, T. 8. no 3, pp. 42-47.(In Russ., abstr. in Engl.)
  12. Gomіlko O. Metafіzika tіlesnostі: kontsept tіla u fіlosofs'komu diskursі [Metaphysics physicality Concept body in philosophical discourse]. Kiev: Nauk. dumka, 2001. 340 p. (In Ukr.).

Information About the Authors

Natalya V. Shmeleva, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Chair of Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University named after Kozma Minin, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia, e-mail: shmelevanv@mail.ru

Anastasia V. Babaeva, PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University named after Kozma Minin, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia, e-mail: ftf218@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1846
Previous month: 11
Current month: 5

Downloads

Total: 788
Previous month: 1
Current month: 0