The relationship of the temperament of the subject of crime with the characteristics of offences

The features of communication psychological characteristics of temperament types of crimes. The analysis of scientific views on the role of temperament in the predisposition of the individual to the crime. With the help of empirical study confirmed the hypothesis that the subjects who had committed certain type of crime have specific personal psychological characteristics that reveal the determinants of their offences. The personality questionnaires EPI and MMPI used methods of analysis of personal files of prisoners; observation of their behaviour and discussions with them; drawing up of psychological portraits. Also developed and used an original questionnaire. The results showed that among criminals-murderers is dominated by people with a tendency to choleric expression of properties of temperament, expressed the need for self-affirmation, affective behavior, impulsivity, and disregard for social demands. The perpetrators of the theft inherent in the assertion of his personality not only in the eyes of the environment, but above all in its own. The perpetrators of rape there is usually no clear idea of traditionally male and female traits in behaviour, the relationship between a man and a woman are limited to sexual function. Criminals convicted of fraud and hooliganism, unable to establish contact with others not able to take the point of view of another, there is a disregard for moral and ethical standards.

1. Аlekseeva L.V. Psikhologicheskaya kharakteristika sub"ekta prestupleniya. Аvtoreferat disser… doktora psikhologicheskikh nauk. 19.00.06 – yuridiche-skaya psikhologiya 19.00.01 - obshhaya psikhologiya, psikhologiya lichnosti, istoriya psikhologii. - S-Pb, 2006. – 40 p.
2. Аntonyan U.M. Lichnost' prestupnika. M.: Nauka, 2004. - 185 s.
3. Blekborn R. Psikhologiya kriminal'nogo povedeniya. /Per. s angl. SPb.: Piter, 2004. – 225 p.
4. Dmitriev YU.А., Kazak B.B. Penitentsiarnaya psikhologiya. Uchebnik
   Rostov-na-Donu, 2007. – 220 p.
5. Debol'skij M.G., Krotova D.N. Profilaktika faktorov riska peniten-tsiarnoj prestupnosti. //Psikhologiya i pravo. 2013, №3. P. 55-65.
6. Dril' D.А. Prestupnost' i prestupniki. SPb.: Vyborg,1895. – 134 p.
7. Enikeev M.I. YUridicheskaya psikhologiya: Uchebnik. SPb.: Piter, 2004. – 426 p.
   Zhvankov V.А. CHelovek kak nositel' kriminalisticheski znachimoj in-formatsii. M, 1993. – 180 p.
8. Lombrozo Ch. Novejshie uspekhi nauki o prestupnike. /Per.s angl. SPb.: Rech', 2002. – 112 p.
9. Lombrozo Ch. Prestupnyj chelovek. / Per. s ital. M.: Literatura, 1988. – 196 p.
10. Lombrozo Ch., Kriminal'no- psikhologicheskij i sotsiologicheskij ocherk /Per.s angl. SPb.: Vyborg, 1895.- 115 p.
11. Pastushenya А.N. Kriminal'naya psikhologiya: Uchebno-metodicheskoe poso-bie. Mn.: Narodna asveta, 2007. – 265 p.
12. Pecherskij V.G., Maksimenko N.V., Ivanov D.E. Issledovanie lichnostnykh osobennostej osuzhdennykh za nasil'stvennye i korystnye prestupleniya // EHksperimental'naya psikhologiya. - P. 710-714.
13. Filanovskij I.G. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskoe otnoshenie sub"ekta k prestupleniyu. Аvtoreferat disser… doktora yuridicheskikh nauk. LGU, 1970. - 31 p.
14. Kukorin А.V., Kukorina I.V. KHarakteristika osuzhdennykh za prestupleniya protiv polovoj neprikosnovennosti i polovoj svobody lichnosti, ot-byvayushhikh ugolovnoe nakazanie v vide lisheniya svobody v Rossii // Psikho-logiya i pravo. № 1. 2012.– P. 48-56.