Skip to Main Content

Psychology and Law
2018. Vol. 8, no. 3, 111–122
doi:10.17759/psylaw.2018080308
ISSN: 2222-5196 (online)

Legal aspects of participation of psychologist as a specialist in enforcement of court decisions in parenting cases (Part II)

693

V.V. Guldan, O.N. Sulima, A.A. Sukhotin

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

The article reveals the questions about the order of the choice and involvement of a specialist psychologist to participate in the enforcement proceedings related to the upbringing of children, by bailiff-contractor or on the initiative of the party of enforcement proceedings. At the moment in the execution of court decisions on the transfer and the confiscation of the child bailiffs do not attract the psychologist at the preparatory stage for working separately with the child, however, such possibility is provided in paragraph 17 of part 1 of article 64 of the Federal law “On enforcement proceedings”. Proposals are made on the legislative consolidation of the mandatory participation of a specialist psychologist in the execution of Executive documents related to the upbringing of children. The authors identify the requirements for professional competence, which should be owned by a specialist psychologist, and raise the question of the need to develop a training program for psychologists involved in the execution of court decisions related to the upbringing of children. On the basis of the analysis of practice and letters of Federal Bailiffs Service of Russia authors identify tasks which should be solved by the psychologist in enforcement proceedings.

General Information

Keywords: psychologist as a specialist, enforcement proceeding, execution of judgments, transfer (confiscation) of a child, order of communication with a child.

Journal rubric: Forensic and Clinical Psychology in Legal Context

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2018080308

For citation: Guldan V.V., Sulima O.N., Sukhotin A.A. Legal aspects of participation of psychologist as a specialist in enforcement of court decisions in parenting cases (Part II) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2018. Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 111–122. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2018080308. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Apellyacionnoe opredelenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 02.06.2015 № 33-18524/15 [Elektronnyi resurs.] [The appellate ruling of the Moscow city court dated 02.06.2015 No. 33-18524/15]. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/135171666/ (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  2. Kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2017) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 29.01.2018) [Elektronnyi resurs.] [Code of the Russian Federation about administrative offences dated 30.12.2001 No 195-FZ (as amended dated 31.12.2017) (rev. and add., intro. in force dated 29.01.2010)]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34661/ (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  3. Miheeva A.V. Psihicheskaya travma v opredeleniyah i ponyatiyah sovremennyh uchenyh [Psychic trauma in the definitions and concepts of modern scientists]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Voprosy obrazovaniya: yazyki i special'nost' [Bulletin of Peoples Friendship University of Russia. Series: Issues of Education: languages and specialty], 2009, no. 2, pp. 142–148.
  4. Pis'mo FSSP Rossii ot 14.06.2012 № 12/01-14324-TI «O poryadke organizacii raboty pri ispolnenii sudebnyh reshenij ob otobranii rebenka, ob opredelenii mesta zhitel'stva rebenka, ob opredelenii poryadka obshcheniya s rebenkom» [Elektronnyi resurs.] [Letter of the Federal Bailiffs Service of Russia dated 14.06.2012 No. 12/01-14324-TI “About the organization of work in the execution of judicial decisions about removal of the child, the determination of the place of residence of the child, determination of the procedure of communication with a child”]. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/70249460/ (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  5. Pis'mo FSSP Rossii ot 30.04.2014 № 00011/14/24417-AP «Ob osushchestvlenii kontrolya za ispolneniem ispolnitel'nyh dokumentov, svyazannyh s vospitaniem detej» [Elektronnyi resurs.] [Letter of the Federal Bailiffs Service of Russia dated 30.04.2014 No. 00011/14/24417-AP “On control over execution of Execution documents related to the upbringing of children”]. Available at: https://academpsy.org/media/2017/11/30-aprelya-2014-goda-00011-14-24417-AP.pdf (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  6. Pis'mo FSSP Rossii ot 28.04.2016 № 00011/16/37579-SVS «Ob organizacii raboty po ispolneniyu ispolnitel'nyh proizvodstv, svyazannyh s vospitaniem detej» [Elektronnyi resurs.] [Letter of the Federal Bailiffs Service of Russia dated 28.04.2016 No. 00011/16/37579-SVS “On the organization of work on execution of enforcement proceedings related to the upbringing of children”]. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/71450924/ (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  7. Prikaz FSSP Rossii ot 11.07.2012 № 318 «Ob utverzhdenii primernyh form processual'nyh dokumentov, primenyaemyh dolzhnostnymi licami Federal'noj sluzhby sudebnyh pristavov v processe ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva» [Elektronnyi resurs.] [The order of the Federal Bailiffs Service of Russia dated 11.07.2012 No. 318 “On approval of approximate forms of the procedural documents used by officials of the Federal Bailiffs Service in the process of enforcement proceeding”]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_134731/ (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  8. Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 14.06.2011. Delo «Hanamirova (Khanamirova) protiv Rossijskoj Federacii» (zhaloba № 21353/10) [Elektronnyi resurs.] [The ruling of the ECHR dated 14.06.2011. Case “Khanamirova against the Russian Federation” (complaint № 21353/10)]. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/70286686/ (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  9. Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 13.11.2012. Delo «Y.U. protiv Rossijskoj Federacii» (zhaloba № 41354/10) [Elektronnyi resurs.] [The ruling of the ECHR dated 13.11.2012. Case “Y.U. against the Russian Federation” (complaint № 41354/10)]. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/70472282/ (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  10. Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 03.10.2013. Delo «Zelenevy (Zelenevy) protiv Rossijskoj Federacii» (zhaloba № 59913/11) [Elektronnyi resurs.] [The ruling of the ECHR dated 03.10.2013. Case “Zelenevy against the Russian Federation” (complaint № 59913/11)]. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/70858438/ (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  11. Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 24.10.2013. Delo «Pahomova (Pakhomova) protiv Rossijskoj Federacii» (zhaloba № 22935/11) [Elektronnyi resurs.] [The ruling of the ECHR dated 24.10.2013. Case “Pakhomova against the Russian Federation” (complaint № 22935/11)]. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/70858052/ (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  12. Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 16.10.2014. Delo «Vorozhba (Vorozhba) protiv Rossijskoj Federacii» (zhaloba № 57960/11) [Elektronnyi resurs.] [The ruling of the ECHR dated 16.10.2014. Case “Vorozhba against the Russian Federation” (complaint № 57960/11)]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB&n=414775#0 (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  13. Solov'eva N.A. Psihotravmiruyushchaya situaciya: znachenie dlya kvalifikacii detoubijstv [Psycho-traumatic situation: the value for qualification of infanticide]. Zakonnost' [Legality], 2006, no. 8, pp. 11–13.
  14. Strel'cova E.G. Ispolnenie ispolnitel'nyh dokumentov po neimushchestvennym vzyskaniyam [The enforcement of executive documents on non-property recoverings]. Vestnik ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva [Bulletin of enforcement proceeding], 2016, no. 4, pp. 12–45.
  15. Federal'nyj zakon ot 02.10.2007 № 229-FZ «Ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve» [Elektronnyi resurs.] [Federal law dated 02.10.2007 No. 229-FZ “On Enforcement Proceedings”] // Available at: http://base.garant.ru/12156199/ (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  16. Fedunina N.Yu., Burmistrova E.V. Psihicheskaya travma. K istorii voprosa [Psychic trauma. Dedicated to the history of the issue]. Konsul'tativnaya psihologiya i psihoterapiya [Counseling psychology and psychotherapy], 2005, no. 2, pp. 164–190.

Information About the Authors

Viktor V. Guldan, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Head of Pathopsychological Laboratory, Forensic Psychiatric Examination Department, State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare in the Moscow region "Central Clinical Psychiatric Hospital", Moscow, Russia, e-mail: vguldan@mail.ru

Olga N. Sulima, Senior Lecturer, Department of Civil, Copyright and Environmental law, Institute of Economics and Management, Rkhtu im. D. I. Mendeleev, Chairman, bar Association of Moscow "Legal assistance and protection", Moscow, Russia, e-mail: olga-sulim@mail.ru

Alexander A. Sukhotin, Director, ANO DPO "Academy of Applied Psychology and Psychotherapy», Senior Lecturer, Department of Pedagogy and Medical Psychology, Institute of Sociology, Psychology and Humanities, First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: sukhotin@academpsy.org

Metrics

Views

Total: 6294
Previous month: 120
Current month: 65

Downloads

Total: 693
Previous month: 5
Current month: 0