Psychological, Social and Informational Aspects of Attacks by Minors on Educational Institutions

767

Abstract

The article examines the factors influencing the attacks by minors on educational institutions. The analysis of publications offering explanations and theoretical models of such crimes is performed. The authors present the results of their own qualitative analysis of data from an empirical study of 9 teenagers who attacked schools, and materials of criminal cases. The analysis is performed as part of a comprehensive forensic psychological and psychiatric examination. The data indicate the specific personality structure of adolescents and their existing mental disorders, as well as their special socio-psychological status in the classroom as outcasts and isolated. A compensatory mechanism of identity development is described with a focus on the role model of teenagers who attacked the Columbine school in the United States, and who imitated their actions. The role of the Internet in this process is evaluated. It is concluded that there is a need for a multidimensional analysis of such actions and appropriate preventive work.

General Information

Keywords: attacks in schools, minors, aggressive behavior, auto-aggressive behavior, suicide, the Internet.

Journal rubric: Legal Psychology of Childhood

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2020100208

For citation: Dozortseva E.G., Oshevsky D.S., Syrokvashina K.V. Psychological, Social and Informational Aspects of Attacks by Minors on Educational Institutions [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2020. Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 97–110. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2020100208. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Boikina E.E. Agressiya skvoz' prizmu sotsial'nogo ostrakizma [Aggression through the prism of social ostracism] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology]. 2019. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 60—67. doi: 10.17759/jmfp.2019080307 (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  2. Boikina E.E., Chirkina R.V. Sotsial'nyi ostrakizm: sovremennoe sostoyanie problemy, metodologiya i metody issledovaniya [Social ostracism: current state of the problem, methodology and research methods]. Psikhologiya i pravo [Psychology and Law] 2020. Vol. 10. № 1. P. 152—170. doi: 10.17759/psylaw.2020100114. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  3. Davydov D.G., Khlomov K.D. Massovye ubiistva v obrazovatel'nykh uchrezhdeniyakh: mekhanizmy, prichiny, profilaktika [Massacres in educational institutions: mechanisms, causes, prevention]. Natsional'nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal [National Psychological Journal]. 2018. № 4(32). P. 62—76. doi: 10.11621/npj.2018.0406. (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  4. Knizhnikova S.V. Amok: aktual'nost' izucheniya napadenii v shkolakh, prichiny, vozmozhnosti pervichnoi profilaktiki [Amok: Relevance of School Attacks Exploring, Causes, and Primary Prevention Possibilities]. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society]. 2019. Vol.10. № 1. P. 152—168. doi: 10.17759/sps.2019100109 (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  5. Oshevskii D.S. Negativnye sotsial'nye ustanovki i smyslovye konstrukty u podrostkov, sovershivshikh agressivnye protivopravnye deyaniya na natsional'noi pochve [Negative social attitudes and meaning constructs in juveniles, conducted aggressive criminal acts based on nationalism] . Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya [Juridical Psychology]. 2012. № 3. P. 30—34. (In Russ.).
  6. Standarty sudebno-psikhiatricheskikh ekspertnykh issledovanii Gosudarstvennogo nauchnogo tsentra sotsial'noi i sudebnoi psikhiatrii im. V.P. Serbskogo (izvlecheniya) [Standards of forensic psychiatric expert research of the V.P. Serbsky State Scientific Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry (extraction)]. Meditsinskaya i sudebnaya psikhologiya. Pod redaktsiei T.B.Dmitrievoi, F.S. Safuanova. M.: «Genezis», 2016. P 599—604. (In Russ.).
  7. Syrokvashina K.V. Napadeniya v shkolakh: agressivnye i autoagressivnye deistviya nesovershennoletnikh [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology]. 2019. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 37—44. doi:10.17759/jmfp.2019080304 (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  8. Agnich L.E. A Comparative Analysis of Attempted and Completed School-Based Mass Murder Attacks. American Journal of Criminal Justice. 2015. Vol. 40. № 1. P. 1—22. doi:10.1007/s12103-014-9239-5
  9. Gerard F.J. et al. Offender and offence characteristics of school shooting incidents. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. 2016. Vol. 13 (1). P. 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1439
  10. Langman P. Rampage School Shooters: A Typology. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2009. Vol. 14. P. 79—86.
  11. Lankford A. A comparative analysis of suicide terrorists and rampage, workplace, and school shooters in the United States from 1990 to 2010. Homicide Studies. 2012. Vol.17. P. 255-274. doi:10.1177/1088767912462033
  12. Larkin R.W. Learning to Be a Rampage Shooter: The Case of Elliot Rodger. The Wiley Handbook on Violence in Education: Forms, Factors, and Preventions. Eds H.Shapiro. Wiley, 2018, pp.69—84.
  13. Leary M.R. et al. Teasing, rejection, and violence: case studies of the school shootings. Aggressive Behavior. 2003. Vol. 29. P. 202—214. doi:10.1002/ab.10061
  14. Lee K. Mass Shootings and Media Contagion Theory: Social Media’s Influence on Frequency of Incidents. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications. 2018. Vol. 9 (2). P. 27—35.
  15. Levin J., Madfis E. Mass Murder at School and Cumulative Strain: A Sequential Model. American Behavioral Scientist. 2009. Vol. 52. № 9. P. 1227—1245. doi:10.1177/0002764209332543
  16. Mears D.P., Moon M., Thielo A.J. Columbine Revisited: Myths and Realities about the Bullying-School Shootings Connection. Victims and Offenders. 2017. Vol.12. № 6. P. 939—955.
  17. O’Toole M.E. The school shooter: A threat assessment perspective. Quantico, VA: National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2000. 46 p.
  18. Towers S. et al. Contagion in Mass Killings and School Shootings. PLoS ONE. 2015. Vol. 10 (7): e0117259. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117259
  19. Verlinden S., Hersen M., Thomas J. Risk factors in school shootings. Clinical Psychology Review. 2000. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 3—56. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00055-0

Information About the Authors

Elena G. Dozortseva, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor, Department of Legal Psychology and Law, Faculty of Legal Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Senior Researcher, Laboratory for Child and Adolescent Psychology, V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation,Member of the editorial board of the scientific journal “Psychology and Law” member of the editorial board of the scientific journal “Psychological Science and Education”, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1309-0485, e-mail: edozortseva@mail.ru

Dmitry S. Oshevsky, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher at the Laboratory of Child and Adolescent Psychology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Associate Professor of the Department of Legal Psychology and Law, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3465-6302, e-mail: oshevsky@serbsky.ru

Ksenia V. Syrokvashina, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher at the Laboratory of Child and Adolescent Psychology, V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3172-6130, e-mail: syrokvashina@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1406
Previous month: 27
Current month: 17

Downloads

Total: 767
Previous month: 12
Current month: 13