Social Frustration, Resilience and Psychological Security of Internal Affairs Officers

The article shows the results of an empirical research of the social frustration, resilience and psychological security of internal affairs officers. We suppose that officers with low or high levels of social frustration differ in the values of psychological security of their personalities and their resilience. The study results showed differences in social frustration in groups of subjects with high and low levels of psychological security of personality. Correlation analysis revealed reliable negative relationship between the social frustration, resilience and fundamental convictions of the officers of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. On the whole, one can conclude that officers with high levels of psychological security of personality are notable for lowered social frustration and increased resilience. Therefore, an increased level of social frustration can lower the resilience and pose a threat to the psychological security of personality of internal affairs officers.

1. Baeva I.A. Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost' v obrazovanii: Monografiya. Saint-Peterburg: Izdatel'stvo «SOYuZ», 2002. 271 р.
2. Bogomaz S.A., Balanev D.Yu. Zhiznestoikost' kak komponent innovatsionnogo potentsiala cheloveka // Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal=Sibir Psychological journal, 2009, рр. 23-28.
3. Bogomaz S.A., Gladkikh A.G. Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost' lichnosti i ee izmerenie s pomoshch'yu shkaly bazisnykh ubezhdenii // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta=Tomsk State University Journal. 2009, no. 318, рр. 191-194.
4. Vasserman L.I., Iovlev B.V., Berebin M.A. Metodika dlya psikhologicheskoi diagnostiki urovnya sotsial'noi frustrirovannosti i ee prakticheskoe primenenie. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. NIPNI im. Bekhtereva, 2004. 28 р.
5. Galyautdinova S.I., Akhmadeeva E.V. Lichnostnye osobennosti i ee psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost' //Doklady Bashkirskogo universiteta=Bashkir State University Reports, 2019. Vyp. 4, no. 3, рр. 254-368.
6. Dzhaner'yan S.T., Gvozdeva D.I., Astaf'eva I.N. Osobennosti sotsial'noi frustrirovannosti lichnosti studentov vuza i rabotayushchikh molodykh lyudei URL: https://publikacia.net/archive/uploads/pages/2015_8_2/43.pdf.
7. Dontsov A.I., Zinchenko Yu.P., Zotova O.Yu., Perelygina E.B. Psikhologiya bezopasnosti. Moscow: Yurait, 2018. 276 р.
8. Kalyagin Yu.S., Filonov L.B. Problemy sotsial'noi pertseptsii v professional'noi deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov pravookhranitel'nykh organov [Elektronnyi resurs] // Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya=Psychological-Educational Studies. 2011. no. 3. URL: http://psyjournals.ru/psyedu_ru/2011/n3/47075.shtml (Accessed: 07.07.2019).
9. Lisova O.E. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti lichnosti sotrudnikov MVD Rossii, vypolnyayushchikh razlichnye sotsial'no-professional'nye funktsii // Izvestiya PGPU im. V. G. Belinskogo, 2011, no. 24, рр. 960-965.
10. Leont'ev D.A., Rasskazova E.I. Test zhiznestoikosti. Moscow: Smysl, 2006. 63 р.
11. Mikhailov L.A., Solomin V.P., Malikova T.V., Shatrovoi O.V. Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost'. Moscow: «Drofa», 2008. 292 р.
12. Padun M.A., Kotel'nikova A.V. Modifikatsiya metodiki issledovaniya bazisnykh ubezhdenii lichnosti R. Yanoff-Bul'man // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal=Psychological Journal, 2008. T. 29, no. 4, рр. 98—106.
13. Ryabova M.G. Faktory psikhologicheskoi bezopasnosti lichnosti v ekstremal'nykh situatsiyakh //Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta=Udmurt State University Journal. 2016. T. 26, vyp. 4, рр. 94-99.
14. Tillikh P. Izbrannoe: Muzhestvo byt'. Moscow: «Yurist», 1995. 479 р.