Psychological Well-being and Resilience of Substitute Mothers

51

Abstract

This article analyzes the relationship between psychological well-being and resilience in the context of attitudes toward adopted children among foster mothers. The hypothesis suggests that a mother’s active participation in upbringing promotes democratic relationships with the child and creative approaches to problem-solving, and that her psychological well-being depends on an optimistic attitude and willingness to cooperate with the child. The respondents were 48 foster mothers, raising between 1 and 7 adopted children. The average age of the substitute mothers was 40 ± 6 years. To test the hypothesis, the following methods were used: the “Resilience Test” by S. Maddi, the “Psychological Well-Being Scale” by K. Ryff, the “Parental Attitude Diagnostics” questionnaire by A.Ya. Varga and V.V. Stolin, and the “Personal change-readiness survey” in the adaptation by N.A. Bazhanova, G.L. Bardier. The study confirmed the hypothesis and identified a connection between psychological well-being and resilience in substitute mothers. It was also established that the well-being and ability of a substitute mother to withstand social pressure depend on her ability to cope with stress, her readiness for self-realization, and her ability to achieve goals. A high level of psychological well-being contributes to the enjoyment of raising an adopted child.

General Information

Keywords: psychological well-being, personal readiness, parental attitude, substitute mother, resilience, foster child

Journal rubric: Social Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/ssc.2024050203

For citation: Zaytseva A.S., Egorova M.A. Psychological Well-being and Resilience of Substitute Mothers [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsial’nye nauki i detstvo = Social Sciences and Childhood, 2024. Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 39–53. DOI: 10.17759/ssc.2024050203. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

A Part of Article

 

References

  1. Aslamazova L.A., Khakunova F.P. Zameshchayushchaya sem’ya kak predmet nauchnykh issledovanii [Substitute family as subject of scientific research]. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Pedagogika i psikhologiya [Bulletin of the Adyghe State University, Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”], 2017, no. 3 (203), pp. 25–32. (In Russ.).
  2. Vodyakha S.A. Zhiznestoikost’ kak faktor psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya [Resilience as a factor of psychological well-being]. Lichnost’ v sovremennom mire: sbornik nauchnykh statei [Personality in the modern world: a collection of scientific articles]. Yekaterinburg: Ural’skii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet, Institut psikhologii [Ural State Pedagogical University, Institute of Psychology], 2016, pp. 55–59. (In Russ.).
  3. Vodyakha S.A. Sovremennye kontseptsii psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya lichnosti [Modern concepts of psychological well-being of the individual]. Diskussiya [Discussion], 2012, no. 2, pp. 132–138. (In Russ.).
  4. Vygotsky L.S. Monografiya: Razvitie psikhiki [Monograph: The development of the psyche]. Moscow: Universitetskaya kniga [University book], 2016, pp. 45–47. (In Russ.).
  5. Vygotsky L.S. Psikhologiya iskusstva [Psychology of art]. Moscow: Progress [Progress], 2019, pp. 211–218. (In Russ.).
  6. Vygotsky L.S. Psikhologiya razvitiya cheloveka. Moscow: EKSMO [EKSMO], 2018, pp. 121–132. (In Russ.).
  7. Danilova M.A., Panteleimonova T.S. Teoreticheskie aspekty problemy sovladayushchego povedeniya materei v zameshchayushchikh sem’yakh [Theoretical aspects of the problem of coping behavior of mothers in substitute families]. Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P.F. Lesgafta [Scientific notes of Lesgaft University], 2023. Vol. 6, no. 220, pp. 510–513. (In Russ.).
  8. Danilova M.A., Tarasenko E.A. Psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie lichnosti: ponyatie i osnovnye urovni [Personality psychological well-being: concept and levels]. Forum molodykh uchenykh [Forum of Young Scientists], 2019, no. 4 (32), pp. 285–289. (In Russ.).
  9. Dubrovina I.V. Fenomen “psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie” v kontekste sotsial’noi situatsii razvitiya [Elektronnyi resurs] [The Phenomena of “Psychological Well-Being” in the Context of the Social Situation of Development]. Vestnik prakticheskoi psikhologii obrazovaniya [Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education], 2020. Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 9–21. DOI:10.17759/bppe.2020170301 (In Russ.).
  10. Zaitseva A.S. Svyaz’ psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya i zhiznestoikosti u zameshchayushchikh materei: Vypusknaya kvalifikatsionnaya rabota (magisterskaya dissertatsiya) [The relationship between psychological well-being and resilience in substitute mothers: Magist. dis.]. Moscow, 2024, 128 p. (In Russ.).
  11. Ivanova E.V. Zhiznestoikost’ v kontekste problemy roditel’stva [Vitality in the context of parenting problems]. Chelovek i obrazovanie [Man and education], 2015, no. 4 (45), pp. 174–178. (In Russ.).
  12. Kostyunin I.E. Svyaz’ psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya i zhiznestoikosti lichnosti v yunosheskom vozraste [The connection of psychological well-being and resilience of personality in adolescence]. Molodoi uchenyi [Young scientist], 2022, no. 19 (414), pp. 398–407. (In Russ.).
  13. Krasnova V.G., Palkina T.S. Problema zhiznestoikosti zameshchayushchei sem’i [The problem of the resilience of a substitute family]. Diskussiya [Discussion], 2012, no. 10, pp. 102–105. (In Russ.).
  14. Kuznetsova S.V. Sub”ektivnoe blagopoluchie i zhiznestoikost’ lichnosti [Subjective well-being and resilience of personality]. Vostok, Zapad, Rossiya: filosofskie i sotsiokul’turnye osnovaniya vzaimodeistviya tsivilizatsii: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [East, West, Russia: philosophical and socio-cultural foundations of the interaction of civilizations: a collection of scientific papers]. Saratov: Kubik, 2017, pp. 146–151. (In Russ.).
  15. Leontiev D.A., Rasskazova E.I. Zhiznestoikost’ kak sostavlyayushchaya lichnostnogo potentsiala [Resilience as a component of personal potential]. Lichnostnyi potentsial: struktura i diagnostika [Personal potential: structure and diagnosis]. Moscow: Smysl [Sense], 2011. 680 p. (In Russ.).
  16. Mitrofanova E.N. Zhiznestoikost’ i psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie studentov [Hardiness and psychological well-being of students]. In Vodyakha S.A. (Ed.). Psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie sovremennogo cheloveka: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi zaochnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Psychological well-being of a modern person: materials of the International correspondence scientific and practical conference]. Yekaterinburg: Ural’skii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet [Ural State Pedagogical University], 2018, pp. 246–251. (In Russ.).
  17. Seligman M.E.P. Novaya pozitivnaya psikhologiya: Nauchnyi vzglyad na schast’e i smysl zhizni, perev. s angl [Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment]. Moscow: Sofiya [Publ. “Sofia”], 2006, 368 p. (In Russ.).
  18. Trukhacheva Yu.S. Teoreticheskoe issledovanie psikhologicheskikh mekhanizmov adaptatsii migrantov v sovremennom sotsiokul’turnom prostranstve (na primere studenchestva) [A theoretical study of the psychological mechanisms of adaptation of migrants in the modern socio-cultural space (on the example of students)]. Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk [Actual problems of humanities and natural sciences], 2011, no. 4, pp. 334–337. (In Russ.).
  19. Yaroshchuk I.V. Psikhologiya zhiznestoikosti: obzor teoreticheskikh kontseptsii, empiricheskikh issledovanii i metodik diagnostiki [The psychology of hardiness: a review of theoretical concepts, empirical research and diagnostic techniques]. Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo institutu psikhologii i sotsial’noi raboty [Scientific Notes Journal of St. Petersburg State Institute of Psychology and Social Work], 2020. Vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 50–60. (In Russ.).
  20. Florian V., Mikulincer M., Taubman O. Does hardiness contribute to mental health during a stressful real-life situation? The roles of appraisal and coping. Journal of Personality and Social Phycology, 1995. Vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 687–695. DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.68.4.687
  21. Koolhaas J.M., Bartolomucci A., Buwalda B., de Boer S.F., Flügge G., Korte S.M., Meerlo P., Murison R., Olivier B., Palanza P., Richter-Levin G., Sgoifo A., Steimer T., Stiedl O., van Dijk G., Wöhr M., Fuchs E. Stress revisited: a critical evaluation of the stress concept. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2011. Vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1291–1301. DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.003
  22. Sharpley C.F., Dua J.K., Reynolds R., Acosta A. The Direct and Relative Efficacy of Cognitive Hardiness, Type A Behaviour Pattern, Coping Behaviour and Social Support as Predictors of Stress and Ill-health. Scandinavian Journal of Behaviour Therapy, 1995, no. 24, pp. 15–29. DOI:10.1080/16506079509455980
  23. Sheier M.F., Carver Ch.S. Dispositional optimism and physical well-being: The influence of generalized outcome expectancies on health. Special Issue: Personality and Physical Health. Journal of Personality, 1989. Vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 169–210. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00434.x
  24. Solcova I., Tomanek P. Daily stress coping strategies: An effect of Hardiness. Studia Psychologica, 1994. Vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 390–392.

Information About the Authors

Anastasiya S. Zaytseva, Head of the production laboratory, “Agrovit” LLC, Master's student of the program “Custody and Guardianship of Minors” at the Faculty of Psychology of Education, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8716-9540, e-mail: zzzooommm@mail.ru

Marina A. Egorova, PhD in Education, Professor, Department of Pedagogical Psychology n.a. Professor V.A. Guruzhapov, Faculty of Psychology of Education, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0716-6858, e-mail: egorovama@mgppu.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 109
Previous month: 41
Current month: 23

Downloads

Total: 51
Previous month: 18
Current month: 13