Urban Vandalism in the Eyes of Youth: an Empirical Study of Its Causes Attribution

The research is devoted to the attribution of the reasons of vandal behavior by urban youth. Quantitative content analysis of respondents' statements (text-mining) on the presented photos of vandalized urban environment, the indicators of respondents' perception of "negative assessment of vandalism" and "explanation of vandal behavior reasons" formed on its basis, as well as the scale of "World image" assessment formed for research purposes are the information collection method. The research sample includes young people from the cities of Yekaterinburg and Moscow. Yekaterinburg, Moscow, St. Petersburg (N=193), aged from 18 to 35 years (M=21.2 years, SD=4.1 years), consisting of men. The collected lexical array of utterances amounted to 6550 words (23657 signs), after generalization made 35 word forms, representing attitudes towards vandalism and typical attributions of its causes. The results of the study show the contradictions between the negative attitudes of young people to vandal behavior and the explanation of the reasons of vandalism, allowing it for the purpose of: a) self-expression, b) under the influence of aggressive emotions, as well as the experience of grief, resentment; c) opposing themselves to others. It is noted that the image of the world influences young people's ideas about the meaning of vandal behavior.

1. Aksakova M.V. Peterburge vsego za god vandaly nanesli RZHD ushcherb v 2,2 milliona rublej [Elektronnyi resurs] [Vandals in St. Petersburg caused 2.2 million rubles worth of damage to Russian Railways in just one year]. Mojka 78 [Mojka 78]. URL: https://moika78.ru/news/2021-02-10/552018-v-peterburge-vsego-za-god-vandaly-nanesli-rzhd-ushherb-v-2-2-milliona-rublej.(Accessed 10.02.2021).
2. Babkin S. Bez zaborov ne obojtis'. Park "Zaryad'e" vynuzhden zashchishchat'sya ot vandalov [Without fences we can't do without. Zaryadye Park is forced to defend itself from vandals].Rossijskaya gazeta [Russian newspaper]. 2017, no. 7374(208), 14 September. (In Russ.).
3. Vasilyuk F.E. Psihologiya perezhivaniya (analiz preodoleniya kriticheskih situacij) [Psychology of experience (analysis of overcoming critical situations)]. Moscow.: MGU publishing, 1984, p. 41. (In Russ.).
4. Vatova L.S. Social'no-psihologicheskij fenomen molodezhnogo vandalizma [The socio-psychological phenomenon of youth vandalism].Srednee professional'noe obrazovanie [ Secondary vocational education], 2009. Vol 3. pp. 25—26. (In Russ.).
5. Vatova L.S. Psihologicheskie osobennosti lichnostej vandalov iz sredy molodezhi i korrekcionno-profilakticheskoj raboty s nimi [Psychological characteristics of the personalities of vandals from among young people and corrective and preventive work with them]. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education]. 2002. Vol. 4, pp. 27—37. (In Russ.).
6. Volkova E.N., Miticina E.A. Obzor psihologicheskih issledovanij vandalizma detej i podrostkov kak osnova proektirovaniya programm profilaktiki v obrazovatel'noj srede [Review of psychological research on vandalism of children and adolescents as a basis for the design of prevention programs in the educational environment].Vestnik Minskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Minsk University], 2020. Vol. №8 (3), p. 6. (In Russ).
7. Volkova L.A. Vandalizm i graffiti kak odna iz form proyavleniya deviacii sredi molodezhi [Vandalism and graffiti as a form of deviation among young people].Psihologiya i pedagogika: metodika i problem prakticheskogo primeneniya [Psychology and Pedagogy: Methodology and Problems of Practical Application], 2009. Vol. 6(1), pp. 120-124. (In Russ.).
8. Gardner YU., Zhurman O., Shereshevskaya E. Buketik dlya vandala. Pochemu municipalitetam za kazhduyu klumbu prihoditsya platit' dvazhdy [A bouquet for a vandal. Why municipalities have to pay twice for each flowerbed]. Rossijskaya gazeta [Russian newspaper]. 2019, no. 7908(150). 11 July. (In Russ.).
9. Gosudarstvennaya avtomatizirovannaya sistema “Pravosudie” [Elektronnyi resurs] [State automated system "Justice"]. URL: https://sudrf.ru. (Accessed 10.02.2021). (In Russ.).
10. Klochko V.E. Samoorganizaciya v psihologicheskih sistemah: problemy stanovleniya mental'nogo prostranstva lichnosti (vvedenie v transspektivnyj analiz) [Self-Organization in Psychological Systems: Problems of Personal Mental Space Formation (Introduction to Transspective Analysis)]. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta, 2005. 189 p. (In Russ.).
11. Mitina O.V., Evdokimenko A.S. Formalizovannye metody issledovaniya tekstov: opyt primeneniya k analizu tekhnicheskoj dokumentacii [Formalized methods of text research: experience of application to the analysis of technical documentation]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya [Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology], 2010. Vol. 9. pp. 60—69. (In Russ.).
12. Nikolaeva Yu.V., Grebennikov V.V., Fedyakin A. V. , Rostokinskiy A.V., Kalinovskaya V.S. Research of Features Of Youth Vandalism And Development of Its Prevention Tools [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiia i pravo [Psychology and Law], 2020. Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 224—234. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2020100315. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
13. Rubinshtejn S.L. Chelovek i mir [Man and the World]. Moscow: Nauka, 1997. 21 p.
14. Rudenkin D.V. Schityvaemyj obraz vandalizma v predstavleniyah rossijskoj gorodskoj molodezhi [A readable image of vandalism in the perceptions of Russian urban youth]. Diskurs [Discourse], 2017. Vol. 10(12), pp. 96—104. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
15. Rudenkin D.V., Vorob'eva I.V., Kruzhkova O.V., Krivoshchekova M.S. Molodezhnyj vandalizm v srede megapolisa: granicy normy i deviacii [Youth vandalism in the metropolitan environment: boundaries of norms and deviations]. Obrazovanie i nauka [Education and Science], 2018. Vol. 20(2), pp.125—146. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
16. Sajt Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verhovnom Sude Rossijskoj Federacii. Razdel “Sudebnaya statistika” [Elektronnyi resurs] [Website of the Judicial Department of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Section "Court statistics"]. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=5 (Accessed 10.02.2021). (In Russ.).
17. Samohina L.M. Preduprezhdenie podrostkovogo vandalizma [Prevention of adolescent vandalism]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University], 2007. Vol. 2. pp. 108—113. (In Russ.).
18. Serkin V.P. Professional'naya specifika obraza mira i obraza zhizni [Professional specificity of an image of the world and a way of life]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Journal of Psychology], 2012. Vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 78—-90. (In Russ.).
19. Truhanova Y.U. Varvarskie vyhodki. Ushcherb ot huliganstva podrostkov v Rybinske ocenivaetsya millionami rublej. Mozhno li izbezhat' recidivov? [Barbaric antics. The damage from hooliganism by teenagers in Rybinsk is estimated at millions of rubles. Is it possible to avoid recidivism?]. Rossijskaya gazeta – Ekonomika Dal'nego Vostoka [Rossiyskaya Gazeta - Economy of the Far East], 2020, no. 8298 (236). 20 October. (In Russ.).
20. Canter D. Vandalism, overview and prospect. Vandalism behavior and motivations. Amsterdam: Elsevier science publishers B.V., 1984, pp. 269—279.
21. Сeccato V., Haining R. Crime in Border Regions: The Scandinavian Case of Öresund, 1998—2001. [Annals of the Association of American Geographers], 2004. Vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 807—826. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.00436.x
22. Cohen S. Destruction of property: Motives and meanings. Vandalism. C. Ward (ed.). London: The Architectural Press, 1973, pp. 23—-53.
23. Cohen S., Levy-Leboyer C. Sociological approaches to vandalism. Vandalism: behaviour and motivation. Amsterdam: Elsevier science publishers B.V., 1984, pp. 51—62.
24. Miner G., Elder J., Fast A., Hill T., Nisbet R., Delen D. Conceptual Foundations of Text Mining and Preprocessing Steps. Practical Text Mining and Statistical Analysis for Non-Structured Text Data Applications, 2012, pp. 43—-51. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386979-1.00003-7
25. Fey M., Clarke K.A. Consistency of choice in nonparametric multiple comparisons. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, 2012. Vol. 24(2), pp. 531—-541. doi: 10.1080/10485252.2012.675436
26. Poyser B., Poyser S. Social deviance theories: can they explain rural vandalism in the twenty-first century? Deviant Behavior, 2018. Vol 39 (1), pp. 35-45. doi:10.1080/01639625.2016.1260382
27. Tomczak A, Tomczak E. The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends Sport Science, 2014. Vol.1, pp. 19—25.