Assessing the Risk of Radicalisation in Adolescents and Young Adults: Some Empirical Evidence

105

Abstract

Based on M. Hogg’s uncertainty-identity theory, a radicalisation risk assessment model was formulated. The aim of the presented study was to test the model for assessing the risk of radicalisation in adolescents and young people. A total of 580 adolescents and young people aged from 14 to 27 years (M=17.32, SD=1.66) took part in the study; 392 respondents were female, 7 respondents did not indicate their gender. The main method of the study was a survey in the form of a questionnaire. The risk assessment model got partial empirical support. For further validation of the model it was proposed to implement the following steps: 1) to identify the particularities of social identities in a subsample of schoolchildren; 2) to analyse the characteristics of the groups with which schoolchildren and students identify themselves; 3) based on the results of the most recent studies, it is proposed to use the method of social identity mapping, which demonstrates its advantages over traditional ways of measuring social identity.

General Information

Keywords: radicalisation, mechanisms of radicalisation, feeling of uncertainty, social identity, risk assessment model

Journal rubric: Methodological Problems of Legal Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2023130307

Funding. The work was performed as a part of the research project “Assessment of the radicalisation risk among young people” (State assignment of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation, no. 073-00038-23-02 dated 13.02.2023)

Received: 23.07.2023

Accepted:

For citation: Dvoryanchikov N.V., Bovin B.G., Melnikova D.V., Belova E.D., Bovina I.B. Assessing the Risk of Radicalisation in Adolescents and Young Adults: Some Empirical Evidence [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2023. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 93–107. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2023130307. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Andreeva G.M. Psikhologiya sotsial’nogo poznaniya. Moscow: Aspekt press. 2000. 288 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Dvoryanchikov N.V., Bovin B.G., Bovina I.B. Otsenka riska radikalizatsii v podrostkovo-molodezhnoi srede: potentsial sotsial’no-psikhologicheskogo znaniya [Radicalisation among Young People: In Search of Risk Assessment Model] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i parvo = Psychology and Law, 2022. Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 207–223. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2022120215 (In Russ.).
  3. Emelin V.A., Rasskazova E.I., Tkhostov A.Sh. Tekhnologii i identichnost’: transformatsiya protsessov identifikatsii pod vliyaniem tekhnicheskogo progressa. Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial’nykh problem (elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal) = Modern Studies of Social Problems, 2012, no. 9 (17), pp. 33. (In Russ.).
  4. Emelin V.A., Tkhostov A.Sh. Deformatsiya khronotopa v usloviyakh sotsiokul’turnogo uskoreniya. Voprosy filosofii = Voprosy Filosofii, 2015, no. 2, pp. 15–24. (In Russ.).
  5. Emelin V.A., Tkhostov A.Sh. Soblazny i lovushki temporal’noi identichnosti. Voprosy filosofii = Voprosy Filosofii, 2016, no. 8, pp. 115–125. (In Russ.).
  6. Tkhostov A.Sh., Surnov K.G. Vliyanie sovremennykh tekhnologii na razvitie lichnosti i formirovanie patologicheskikh form adaptatsii: obratnaya storona sotsializatsii. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 2005. Vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 16–24. (In Russ.).
  7. Belavadi S., Hogg M.A. Social categorisation and identity process in uncertainty management: the role of intragroup communication. In Thye S.R., Lawler E.J. (eds.). Advances in Group Processes. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2019, pp. 61–77. doi:10.1108/S0882-614520190000036006
  8. Bentley S.V., Haslam S.A., Greenaway K.H., Cruwys T., Steffens N. A picture is worth a thousand words: social identity mapping as a way of visualizing and assessing social group connections In Winkler I., Reissner S., Pereira R. (eds.). Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Identity In and Around Organizations: Usual Suspects and Beyond. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2023, pp. 87–102. doi:10.4337/9781802207972.00018
  9. Blanchard A.L., Caudill L.E., Walker L.S. Developing an entitativity measure and distinguishing it from antecedents and outcomes within online and face-to-face groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2020. Vol. 23. P. 91–108. doi:10.1177/1368430217743577
  10. Brewer M.B., Hong Y., Li Q. Dynamic entitativity. In Yzerbyt V., Judd C. M., Corneille O. (eds.). The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism. New York, NY: Psychology Press, 2004, pp. 19–29.
  11. Campbell D. Common Fate, Similarity, and Other Indices of the Status of Aggregates of Persons as Social Entities. Behavioral Science, Vol. 3, pp. 14–25. doi:10.1002/bs.3830030103
  12. Haslam C., Jetten J., Cruwys T., Dingle G., Haslam S.A. The New Psychology of Health: Unlocking the Social Cure. London: Routledge, 2018. 490 p. doi:10.4324/9781315648569
  13. Hogg M.A. Self-uncertainty, social identity and the solace of extremism. In Hogg M.A., Blaylock D.L. (eds.). Extremism and psychology of uncertainty. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, pp. 19–35. doi:10.1002/9781444344073.ch2
  14. Hogg M.A. Social identity theory. In Burke P.J. (ed.). Contemporary social psychological theories. Palo-Alto: Stanford University Press, 2006, pp. 111–136.
  15. Hogg M.A. To belong or not to belong: some self-conceptual and behavioural consequences of identity uncertainty. Revista de Psicología Social, Vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 586–613 doi:10.1080/02134748.2015.1065090
  16. Hogg M.A. Uncertainty-identity theory. In Lange P.A.M., Kruglanski A.W., Higgins E.T. (eds.). Handbook of theories of social psychology. Van Sage Publications Ltd, 2012, pp. 62–80. doi:10.4135/9781446249222.n29
  17. Hogg M.A. Uncertainty-identity theory. In Zanna M.P. (ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 39. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2007, pp. 69–126.
  18. Hogg M., Kruglanski A., Van den Bos K. Uncertainty and the Roots of Extremism. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 407–418. doi:10.1111/josi.12021
  19. King M., Taylor D.M. The Radicalization of Homegrown Jihadists: A Review of Theoretical Models and Social Psychological Evidence. Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 602–622. doi:10.1080/09546553.2011.587064
  20. Lickel B., Hamilton D.L., Sherman S.J. Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relational styles, and the perception of group entitativity. Personality & Social Psychology Review, Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 129–140. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_4
  21. Lickel B., Hamilton D.L., Wieczorkowska G., Lewis A., Sherman S.J., Uhles A.N. Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000. Vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 223–246. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.223
  22. McCauley C. The ABC model: Commentary from the Perspective of the Two Pyramids Model of Radicalization. Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 451–459. doi:10.1080/09546553.2020.1763964
  23. Palmonari A., Pombeni M. L., Kirchler E. Adolescents and their peer groups: a study on the significance of peers, social categorization processes and coping with developmental tasks. Social Behaviour, Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 33–48.
  24. Sarma K.M. Risk assessment and the prevention of radicalization from nonviolence into terrorism. American Psychologist, Vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 278–288. doi:10.1037/amp0000121
  25. Tajfel H. La catégorisation sociale. In S. Moscovici (ed.) Introduction à la psychologie sociale. Paris: Larousse, 1972. P. 272–302.
  26. Tanti C., Stukas A.A., Halloran M.J., Foddy M. Social identity change: shifts in social identity during adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 555–567. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.05.012

Information About the Authors

Nikolay V. Dvoryanchikov, PhD in Psychology, Docent, Dean, Faculty of Legal and Forensic Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1462-5469, e-mail: dvorian@gmail.com

Boris G. Bovin, PhD in Psychology, Docent, Leading Researcher, Federal State Institution Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-7372, e-mail: bovinbg@yandex.ru

Darya V. Melnikova, Lecturer, Department of Clinical and Forensic Psychology, Faculty of Legal Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4501-8207, e-mail: melnikovadv@mgppu.ru

Evgeniya D. Belova, Specialist, Faculty of Legal Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0747-6121, e-mail: edbelova@mgppu.ru

Inna B. Bovina, Doctor of Psychology, Research Director, Associate Professor, Department of Clinical and Legal Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9497-6199, e-mail: innabovina@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1353
Previous month: 25
Current month: 6

Downloads

Total: 105
Previous month: 4
Current month: 4