Risks of social and communicative integration of children with intellectual disability in the context of global digitalization

 
Audio is AI-generated
47

Abstract

Context and relevance. This analytical review addresses the issue of digital inclusion for children with intellectual disabilities. The ongoing global digitalization process creates new educational and social opportunities while also exacerbating digital inequality. The relevance of this study is determined by the necessity of analyzing strategies for digital integration of this group of children, considering both the opportunities and risks associated with the digital environment. Objective. The study aims to systematize current data on digital inclusion, focusing on barriers to inclusive education, the use of augmentative and alternative communication tools, and the impact of digital technologies on the socialization of children with intellectual developmental disorders. Hypothesis. The digital environment can facilitate the socialization and learning of children with intellectual disabilities, provided that content and tools are adapted to their cognitive abilities. Methods and materials. The research is based on the analysis of scientific publications (2021—2024) on digital accessibility, legal regulation of inclusive education, and the application of modern technologies in learning and social adaptation. The study employs methods of systematization, comparative analysis, and synthesis. Results. The findings highlight the need to adhere to accessibility standards in the development of digital educational platforms and to foster an interdisciplinary approach that integrates pedagogical, technical, psychological, and legal aspects. Augmentative and alternative communication, universal design for learning, virtual reality, and telemedicine solutions hold potential in education and rehabilitation. However, challenges remain, including difficulties in processing multimodal content, information overload, and insufficient adaptation of digital platforms. Conclusions. Effective digital inclusion requires a comprehensive adaptation of educational programs, modernization of digital infrastructure, and the development of specialized competencies among professionals working with children with intellectual disabilities.

General Information

Keywords: intellectual disability, digital risks, digital divide, alternative and augmentative communication, digital accessibility standards

Journal rubric: Legal Psychology of Childhood

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2025150303

Funding. The study was supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation No. 24-28-01653, https://rscf.ru/en/project/24-28-01653/; Russian Christian Academy for Humanities named after Fyodor Dostoevsky.

Received 07.04.2025

Revised 26.04.2025

Accepted

Published

For citation: Zashchirinskaia, O.V., Belimova, P.A. (2025). Risks of social and communicative integration of children with intellectual disability in the context of global digitalization. Psychology and Law, 15(3), 37–53. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2025150303

© Zashchirinskaia O.V., Belimova P.A., 2025

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Akhrenova, N.A., Zaripov, R.I. (2023). The linguopragmatic characteristics of modern polycode-multimodal media text in the context of information-psychological influence. Media Linguistics, 10(4), 428—449. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2023.401
  2. Badmaeva, V.D., Dozortseva, E.G. (2024). Children and crimes using internet technologies. Moscow: V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology Publ. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=68579568 (viewed: 14.03.2025).
  3. Belimova, P.A., Zashchirinskaia, O.V. (2024). Perception of Pictographic Alternative Communication Systems in Disorders of Intellectual Development. Clinical Psychology and Special Education, 13(3), 100—122. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2024130305
  4. Belimova, P.A., Miklyaeva, A.V. (2024). Effect of Visual Images on Digital Communication: Empirical Research Review. SibScript, 26(5), 782—794. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2024-26-5-782-794
  5. Vladimirova, O.N., Chistyakova, N.P., Miroshnichenkо, O.A. (2023). Information Accessibility for People with Mental Disabilities, Including Autism Spectrum Disorders. Autism and Developmental Disorders, 21(1), 49—58. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/autdd.2023210106
  6. Zakrepina, A.V., Strebeleva, E.A. (2023). Theoretical and methodological guidelines for developing the content of rehabilitation classes for students with intellectual disability of grades I-IV (ABGEP variant 9.1). Special Education, 2(70), 16—34. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54093982 (viewed: 14.03.2025).
  7. Zashchirinskaya, O.V., Belimova, P. A. (2024). Cognitive impairments in adolescents with disorders of intellectual development in decoding alternative communication symbols with varying iconicity. Russian Journal of Psychiatry, 2, 46—52. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=73735133 (viewed: 14.03.2025).
  8. Kopus, T.L. (2021). On the research of digital language. Service Plus, 15(2), 13—23. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2413-693X-2021-2-13-23
  9. Murashova, I.Yu., Sayuk, Yu.S. (2022). Speech therapy supports preschoolers with intellectual disabilities in developing readiness for literacy in a mixed-focus group. In: Problems of Inclusion of Children with Intellectual Disabilities in Modern Education: materials of the scientific and practical online conference (March 29, 2021) (pp. 26—31). Moscow. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48609829 (viewed: 14.03.2025).
  10. Rafikova, R.A. (2024). Theoretical aspects of socialization of adolescent children with mild mental retardation. Science and Education, 5(3), 566—577. (In Russ.).
  11. Starikov, A.V. (2021). The relevance of information competence for students with intellectual disabilities in the modern information society. In: N.V. Chekaleva (ed.), Horizons of Education: proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference (Omsk, April 22-23, 2021) (pp. 159—161). Omsk: Publishing house of Omsk State Pedagogical University. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47260229 (viewed: 14.03.2025).
  12. Stetsko, E.V., Kiseleva, D.A. (2024). Digital needs of people with disabilities and prospects for their implementation in the urban services system. Environment. Development (Terra Humana), 4(73), 25—32. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.53115/19975996_2024_04_025_032
  13. Shipkova, K.M., Shport, S.V., Bulygina, V.G. (2024). Foreign Studies of the Neuropsychological and Biological Bases of Aggressive Behavior. Psychology and Law, 14(4), 161— (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140411
  14. Almuaqel, I.A. (2023). Virtual reality and inclusive learning of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A review of findings and the path ahead. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 13049—13065.https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3243530
  15. AlRawi, J.M., AlKahtani, M.A. (2022). Universal design for learning for educating students with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 68(6), 800—808.https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2021.190050
  16. Bencini, G. (2023). Universal Design and Communication Rights: Meeting the Challenge of Linguistic and Communicative Diversity. In: I. Garofolo, G. Bencini (Eds.), Design for Inclusion (pp. 76—82). Amsterdam: IOS Press. https://doi.org/3233/SHTI230402
  17. Buchner, T., Shevlin, M., Donovan, M.-A., Gercke, M., Goll, H., Šiška, J., Janyšková, K., Smogorzewska, J., Szumski, G., Vlachou, A., Demo, H., Feyerer, E., Corby, D. (2021). Same progress for all? Inclusive education, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and students with intellectual disability in European countries. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 18(1), 7—22.https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12368
  18. Glencross, S., Mason, J., Katsikitis, M., Greenwood, K.M. (2021). Internet use by people with intellectual disability: Exploring digital inequality—A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(8), 503—520. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0499
  19. Göransson, K., Bengtsson, K., Hansson, S., Klang, N., Lindqvist, G., Nilholm, C. (2022). Segregated education as a challenge to inclusive processes: A total population study of Swedish teachers’ views on education for pupils with intellectual disability. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(14), 1367—1382. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1810789
  20. Grigal, M., Dukes III, L.L., Walker, Z. (2021). Advancing access to higher education for students with intellectual disability in the United States. Disabilities, 1(4), 438—449.https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities1040030
  21. Krysta, K., Romańczyk, M., Diefenbacher, A., Krzystanek, M. (2021). Telemedicine treatment and care for patients with intellectual disability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), Article 1746. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041746
  22. Mavropalias, T., Alevriadou, A., Rachanioti, E. (2021). Parental perspectives on inclusive education for children with intellectual disabilities in Greece. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 67(6), 397—405. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2019.1675429
  23. McKenzie, J. (2021). Intellectual disability in inclusive education in South Africa: Curriculum challenges. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 18(1), 53—57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12337
  24. O'Donovan, M.-A. (2021). The elusive inclusive university: What does this look like for students with intellectual disability? An Irish perspective. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 18(1), 68—74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12375
  25. Oranga, J., Obuba, E., Boinett, F.J. (2022). Barriers to parental involvement in the education of learners with intellectual disabilities. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 410—423. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.102029
  26. Young, D.A., Quibell, R. (2000). Why rights are never enough: Rights, intellectual disability and understanding. Disability & Society, 15(5), 747—764. https://doi.org/10.1080/713661998

Information About the Authors

Oksana V. Zashchirinskaia, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor of the Department of Pedagogy and Educational Psychology of the Faculty of Psychology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Head of the Department of Psychotraumatology, Christian Academy of the Humanities named after F. Dostoevsky, Associate professor, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Care, Herzen State Pedagogical University, St.Petersburg, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2666-3529, e-mail: zaoks@mail.ru

Polina A. Belimova, PhD in Psychology, Candidate of Science (Psychology), research assistant, Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities named after F. Dostoevsky, Engineer, Center of Usability and Mixed Reality, ITMO University, St.Petersburg, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-4924, e-mail: belimova_polina@mail.ru

Contribution of the authors

Oksana V. Zaschirinskaia — ideas; planning of the research; control over the research.

Polina A. Belimova — annotation, writing and design of the manuscript.

All authors participated in the discussion of the results and approved the final text of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

The article doesn’t contain any materials to be considered by an Ethical committee.

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 108
Previous month: 43
Current month: 8

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 47
Previous month: 16
Current month: 5

 Total

Whole time: 155
Previous month: 59
Current month: 13