Interpretation and Developing of Contemporary Historical Knowledge

In present article is attempted to figure out the role and factor of interpretation in formation structure of modern history experience. As the matter of fact interpretation it is the method knowledge which is influence to the general specificity of disciplinary and also at the cultural situation entirely. Interpretation more truly its role incomparable huge and quality of other than in another fields of knowledge is a factor, which constitutes specifically science world of contemporary historical knowledge and experience.

1. Vizgin V. P. History and meta­history // Questions of philosophy. – 1998. – № 10. – P. 98–111.
2. Oyzerman T. Materialist conception of history: the pros and cons // Questions of philosophy. – 2001. – № 2. – P. 3–32, etc.
3. Popper K. The logic of scientific discovery // Popper K. Selected works / Trans. from English. – Moscow: Progress, 1987. – P. 222.
4. Spengler O. The decline of Europe. Essays on the morphology of world history: In 2 volumes – Moscow: Mysl, 1993. – V. 1. – P. 258.
5. Levi­Strauss C. Structural anthropology. – Moscow: Nauka, 1993. – P. 186.
6. Molchanov N. General de Gaulle. – Moscow: Foreign relations, 1975. – P. 168.
7. Neklasse A. Transmutation of history // Questions of philosophy. – 2001. – № 3. – P. 59.