The sociocultural integratedness of figurative sphere and social well-being as predictors of commitment to a country

773

Abstract

The article is devoted to the topical issue of social and cognitive grounds of commitment to a social community of a country and describes the results of the empirical research of the role of figurative sphere and social well-being of an individual in emergence of sovereign emigration intentions. The author has operationalized the notion of socioculturally integrated personality imaginative sphere and has designed the image and association test procedure to determine the intensity of the phenomenon, meant by the notion. 200 people (120 females and 80 males) aged 18 to 35 took part in the experiment. The research has revealed that commitment to one’s country is connected with high socioculturally integrated personality imaginative sphere. It has also proved that emigration intentions occur among both individuals with low and high satisfaction with social well-being. Low socioculturally integrated personality imaginative sphere appears to be one of the major predictors of sovereign emigration intentions. The article can be an interesting basis for further empirical and theoretical studies. This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Humanities (project № 16-06-50134 «Commitment to one's country and emigration intentions: social and cognitive grounds»).

General Information

Keywords: commitment to one’s country, emigration intentions, social well-being of an individual, socioculturally integrated personality imaginative sphere

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2016070306

For citation: Frolova S.V. The sociocultural integratedness of figurative sphere and social well-being as predictors of commitment to a country. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2016. Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 76–92. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2016070306. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Bassin F.V. “Znachashhie“ perezhivanija i problema sobstvenno-psihologicheskoj za- konomernosti [“Meaningful“ experiences and a problem of psychological regularities in substance]. Voprosy psihologii [Questions of psychology], 1972, no. 3, pp. 105—124.
  2. Gostev A.A. Psihologija vtorichnogo obraza [Psychology of secondary image]. Mos- cow: Publ. Institut psihologii RAN, 2007. 512 p.
  3. Grachev A.A., Rusalinova A.A. Social’noe samochuvstvie cheloveka v organizacii [So- cial «self-feeling» of the person at an organization]. Izvestija Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni. A.I. Gercena [Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities and Sciences], 2007, is. 30, vol. 8, pp. 7—17.
  4. Kolomiec O.V. Social’noe samochuvstvie kak problema social’noj psihologii [Social well-being as a problem of social psychology]. Sovremennaja social’naja psihologija: teo- reticheskie podhody i prikladnye issledovanija [Contemporary social psychology: theoretical approaches and applied research], 2012, no. 3, pp. 14—25.
  5. Kuznecova S.A. Migracionnye ustanovki kak predmet social’no-psihologicheskih issle- dovanij [Migration attitudes as the subject of social psychological research]. Social’naja psihologija i obshhestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2013, no. 4, pp. 34—46.
  6. Kuz’micheva L.N. Social’noe samochuvstvie rossijskoj molodezhi: vlijanie kul’turnyh ustanovok [Social well-being of the Russian youth: influence of cultural installations]. Gumanitarnye, social’no-jekonomicheskie i obshhestvennye nauki [Humanities, social-eco- nomic and social sciences], 2015, no. 6, pp. 160—163.
  7. Lovakov A.V., Lipatov S.A. Organizacionnaja identifikacija i priverzhennost’ person- ala: shodstvo i razlichie [Organizational identification and personnel commitment: simi- larity and difference]. Psihologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher school of economics], 2011, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 69—80.
  8. Lomov B.F. Sistemnost v psikhologii: Isbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy [Systemness in psychology: the Elected psychological works]. Moscow: Publ. Moscow Psychological and Social Institute; Voronezh: Publ. MODEK, 2003. 424 p.
  9. Maslou A. Psihologija bytija [Toward a psychology of being]. Moscow: Refl-book, 1997. 300 p.
  10. Rusalinova A.A. Social’noe samochuvstvie cheloveka kak social’no-psihologicheskij fenomen [Social self-feeling of the person as a socio-psychological phenomenon]. Saint Petersburg: Asterion, 2013. 246 p.
  11. Sadkova D.A. Social’noe samochuvstvie molodezhi: adaptacija k obshhestvennym transformacijam [Social well-being of young people: adaptation to social transformation]. Problemy razvitija territorii [Problems of development of the territory], 2014, no. 6, pp. 91—99.
  12. Frolova S.V. Model’ faktorov priverzhennosti lichnosti social’noj obshhnosti [The Model of Individual Commitment Factors to Social Community]. Izvestija Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaja serija. Ser. Filosofija. Psihologija. Pedagogika [Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy], 2013, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 80—86.
  13. Frolova S.V. Smysloobrazujushhie faktory jemigracionnyh namerenij studentov [The sense-formation factors of students emigratory intentions]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Psy- chological journal], 2006, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 58—67.
  14. Belsky D.W., Moffitt T.E., Corcoran D.L., Domingue B., Harrington H., Hogan S., Houts R., Ramrakha S., Sugden K., Williams B.S., Poulton R., Caspi A. The genetics of success: How single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with educational attainment relate to life-course development. Psychological Science, 2016, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 957—972. doi: 10.1177/0956797616643070.
  15. Berry J.W. Intercultural relations in plural societies: A comparative perspective. In A.Azzi, E. X. Chryssochoou, B. Klandermans, B. Simon (Eds.). Identity and participation in culturally diverse societies. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2012, pp. 279—295.
  16. Berry J.W. Research on multiculturalism in Canada. International Journal of Intercul- tural Relations, 2013, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 663—675. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.09.005
  17. Berry J.W., Phinney J.S., Sam D.L., Vedder P. Immigrant youth: acculturation, iden- tity, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: an International Review, 2006, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 303—332.
  18. Borup J., Ahlin L. Religion and cultural integration: Vietnamese catholics and bud- dhists in Denmark. Nordic journal of migration research, 2011, vol. 1, is. 3, pp. 176—184. doi: 10.2478/v10202-011-0015-z
  19. Buchan N.R., Brewer M.B., Grimalda G., Wilson R.K., Fatas E., Foddy M. Global social identity and global cooperation. Psychological science, 2011, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 821— 828. doi: 10.1177/0956797611409590.
  20. Buchanan P.J. State of emergency. The third world invasion and conquest of America Edge of destruction. New York: Thomas Dunne Books / St. Martin’s Press, 2006. 320 p.
  21. Cole M.S., Bruch H. Organizational identity strength, identification, and commit- ment and their relationship to turnover intention: Does organization hierarchy matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 585—605. doi: 10.1002/job.378
  22. Eriksen T.H. Complexity in social  and  cultural  integration:  Some  analyti- cal dimensions. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2007, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1055—1069. doi: 10.1080/01419870701599481
  23. Hermans H.J.M., Kempen H.J.G. Moving cultures: The perilous problem of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. American Psychologist, 1998, vol. 53, pp. 1111—1120. doi:  10.1037/0003-066X.53.10.1111
  24. Huff K.C., Song P., Gresch E. B. Cultural intelligence, personality, and cross-cultural adjustment: A study of expatriates in Japan. International Journal of Intercultural Rela- tions, 2014, no. 38, pp.151—157. doi: 10.1016/ijintrel.2013.08.005
  25. Hussain D. Social policy, cultural integration and faith: a muslim reflection. Social Policy and Society, 2012, vol. 11, is. 4, pp. 625—635. doi: 10.1017/S1474746412000292
  26. Laurin K., Shepherd S., Kay A.C. Restricted emigration, system inescapability, and defense of the status quo: system-justifying consequences of restricted exit opportunities. Psychological Science, 2010, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1075—1082. doi:10.1177/0956797610375448
  27. Lüthke F., Cropley A. Motive zur Auswanderung aus psychologischer Sicht. Em- pirische Befunde und theoretische Überlegungen. Zeitschrift für Kulturaustausch, 1989, jg. 39. № 3, s. 363—368.
  28. Mata R., Josef A.K. , Hertwig R. Propensity for risk taking across the life span and around the globe. Psychological Science, 2016, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 231—243. doi:10.1177/0956797615617811
  29. Meyer J.P., Becker T.E., van Dick R. Social identities and commitment at work: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 665—683. doi: 10.1002/job.383
  30. Remennick L. The 1.5 Generation of Russian Immigrants in Israel: Between Inte- gration and Sociocultural Retention. Diaspora. A Journal of Transnational Studies, 2003, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 39—66. doi: 10.1353/dsp.2011.0043
  31. Toffler A. Future shock. N.Y.: Random house, 1970. 362 p.

Information About the Authors

Svetlana V. Frolova, PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Consultative Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, National Research Saratov State University, Saratov, Russia, e-mail: frolovasv71@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1867
Previous month: 6
Current month: 1

Downloads

Total: 773
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0