Рredictors of behavioral strategy choice among Russians in intercultural conflict



The article describes the main results of the study investigating the predictors of the behavioral strategy choice among Russians in an imaginary conflict with a representative of the North Caucasus ethnic groups. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research includes the dual concern model, the refined theory of personal values by S. Schwartz and the concept of intergroup anxiety by W. Stefan and C. Stefan. As the predictors of the behavioral strategy choice in a conflict, following personal values were considered: Openness to change, Conservation, Self-Transcendence and Self-Enhancement. The role of intergroup anxiety was tested as a moderator affecting the link between values and behavior in the conflict. Cultural identity and self-esteem were considered as control variables. The study involved 214 ethnic Russians living in Russia (73 men, 141 women, age M = 31.96, SD = 10.21). Respondents were involved in the study helping by “snowball” method. The following methods were used: Organizational Conflict Inventory by M. Rahim in the modification of J. Oetzel, PVQ-R by S. Schwartz, the intercultural communication apprehension scale by J. Neulep and D. McKrosky, and the certain scales from the MIRIPS questionnaire. The results of the path analysis showed that the choice of the competing is positively related to the values of Self-Enhancement and is negative with the values of Self-Transcendence. The choice of collaborating strategy has a positive relation with the values of Self-Transcendence and Openness to change. The choice of an avoiding strategy is positively related to the values of Conservation and intergroup anxiety. The choice of the accommodating did not reveal a significant influence of values but this strategy is in positive connection with cultural identity and in a negative connection with self-esteem. Intergroup anxiety is a moderator of the relationship between the value of Openness to change and the collaborating strategy. The obtained results can be used in the development of recommendations in the field of intercultural communication and in the settlement of intercultural conflicts.

General Information

Keywords: intercultural conflict, personal values, intergroup anxiety, conflict styles, cultural identity

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100105

Funding. The article was prepared during the research within the framework of the Program of Fundamental Research of the National Research University “Higher School of Economics” (HSE) and using subsidies in the framework of state support for the leading universities of the Russian Federation “5-100”.

For citation: Batkhina A.A., Lebedeva N.M. Рredictors of behavioral strategy choice among Russians in intercultural conflict . Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2019. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 70–91. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2019100105. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


  1. Batkhina A.A. Intercultural conflict styles: literature review. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2017. Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 45—62. doi:10.17759/ sps.2017080305 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  2. Karachurina L.B., Mkrtchyan N.V., Abylkalikov S.I. Vnutrirossiiskaya migratsiya naseleniya [Intra-Russian population migration]. In S.V. Zakharov (ed.). Naselenie Rossii 2015: dvadtsat’ tretii ezhegodnyi demograficheskii doklad. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom NIU VShE, 2017, pp. 309—322.
  3. Karachurina L.B., Mkrtchyan N.V. Vnutrennyaya dolgovremennaya migratsiya naseleniya v Rossii i drugikh stranakh [Internal long-term migration of population in Russia and other countries]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [MSU Vestnik]. Seriya 5. Geografiya, 2017, no. 2, pp. 74—80.
  4. Kozer L.A. Funktsii sotsial’nogo konflikta [Functions of social conflict]. Moscow: Dom intellektual’noi knigi: Ideya-press, 2000. 208 p.
  5. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. Strategii mezhkul’turnogo vzaimodeistviya migrantov i naseleniya Rossii [Strategies for Intercultural Interaction between migrants and the population of Russia]. Moscow: RUDN, 2009. 420 p.
  6. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N., Berri Dzh. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie osnovy mul’tikul’turalizma: proverka gipotez o mezhkul’turnom vzaimodeistvii v rossiiskom kontekste [Socio-psychological foundations of multiculturalism: testing hypotheses about intercultural interaction in the Russian context]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal], 2016, no. 37, pp. 92—104.
  7. Malakhov Yu.I. Islamofobiya i drugie faktory radikalizatsii obraza musul’manina v rossiiskom obshchestve [Islamophobia and other factors of the radicalization of the image of a Muslim in Russian society]. Obrazovanie i dukhovnaya bezopasnost’ [Education and spiritual security], 2017, no. 2, pp. 42—46.
  8. Mal’kova V.K. Polietnicheskaya Moskva 2011—2012 gg. Trevozhnye zvonki v informatsionnom prostranstve [Polyethnic Moscow 2011—2012. Alarming calls in the information space]. Issledovaniya po prikladnoi i neotlozhnoi etnologii [Studies on applied and urgent ethnology], 2012, no. 233, pp. 3—80.
  9. Mkrtchyan N.V. Migratsiya v Moskve i Moskovskoi oblasti: regional’nye i strukturnye osobennosti [Migration in Moscow and the Moscow Region: regional and structural features]. Regional’nye issledovaniya [Regional research], 2015, no. 3, pp. 107—116.
  10. Sotkasiira T. Vstrechi s «kavkaztsami». (Pere)osmyslenie «opasnoi» identichnosti v sovremennoi Rossii [Meetings with the “Caucasians”. (Per) understanding of the “dangerous” identity in modern Russia]. Diaspory [Diasporas], 2013, no. 1, pp. 84—112.
  11. Chernysh M.F., Evseeva M.A., Epikhina Yu.B. i dr. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie faktory mezhetnicheskoi napryazhennosti v regionakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Socio-economic factors of inter-ethnic tensions in the regions of the Russian Federation]. Informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten’ Instituta sotsiologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk [Informational and analytical bulletin of the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2015, no. 3, pp. 1—107.
  12. Tsutsiev A. Russkie i kavkaztsy: po tu storonu druzhby narodov [Russians and Caucasians: beyond the friendship of peoples]. Rossiya i musul’manskii mir [Russia and the Muslim world], 2006, no. 4, pp. 33—74.
  13. Shvarts Sh., Butenko T.P., Sedova D.S., Lipatova A.S. Utochnennaya teoriya bazovykh individual’nykh tsennostei: primenenie v Rossii [A refined theory of basic individual values: application in Russia]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics], 2012, no. 9 (2), pp. 43—70.
  14. Allport G.W. The nature of prejudice. Camridge, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1954. 576 p.
  15. Bar-Tal D., Halperin E., Sharvit K., Zafran A. Ethos of Conflict: The Concept and Its Measurement. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 2012, no. 18 (1), pp. 40— 61. doi: 10.1037/a0026860
  16. Esentas M., Özbey S., Güzel P. Self-Awareness and Leadership Skills of Female Students in Outdoor Camp. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2017, no. 5 (10), pp. 197—206. doi:10.11114/jets.v5i10.2600
  17. Gunkel M., Schlaegel C., Taras V. Cultural values, emotional intelligence, and conflict handling styles. A global study. Journal of World Business, 2016, no. 51 (4), pp. 568—585. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2016.02.001
  18. Hair J., Black W., Babin B., Anderson R. Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Ed.). NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, 2010. 816 р.
  19. Hammer M.R. The Developmental paradigm for intercultural competence research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2015, no. 48, pp. 12—13. doi:10.1016/j. ijintrel.2015.03.004
  20. Kline R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2011. 427 р.
  21. Lebedeva N., Tatarko A. Immigration and intercultural interaction strategies in post- Soviet Russia. In E. Tartakovsky (ed.). Immigration: policies, challenges and impact. NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc, 2013, pp. 179—194.
  22. Lebedeva N., Tatarko A., Berry J.W. Intercultural relations among migrants from Caucasus and Russians in Moscow. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2016, no. 52, pp. 27—38. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.03.001
  23. Lebedeva N., Galyapina V.N., Lepshokova Z., Ryabichenko T. Intercultural Relations in Russia. In J.W. Berry (ed.). Mutual intercultural relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 34—58.
  24. Marsella A.J. Culture and conflict: Understanding, negotiating, and reconciling conflicting constructions of reality. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2005, no. 29, pp. 651—673. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.012
  25. Matsumoto D., Hwang H.C. The role of contempt in intercultural communication. Cross-Cultural Research, 2015, no. 40(5), pp. 439—460. doi:10.1177/1069397115599542
  26. Neuliep J.W., McCroskey D. The development of intercultural and interethnic communication apprehension scales. Communication Research Reports, 1997, no. 14, pp. 145—156. doi:10.1080/08824099709388656
  27. Neuliep J.W., Ryan D.J. The influence of intercultural communication apprehension and socio-communicative orientation on uncertainty reduction during initial cross-cultural interaction. Communication Quarterly, 1998, no. 46, pp. 88—99. doi:10.1080/01463379809370086
  28. Oetzel J.G., Myers K., Meares M., Estefana L. Interpersonal conflict in organizations: Exploring conflict styles via face-negotiation theory. Communication Research Reports, 2003, no. 20 (2), pp. 106—115.
  29. Oommen D. The relationship between mental distress, assessed in terms of anxiety and depression, and conflict management in the context of cultural adaptation. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 2013, no. 42, pp. 91—111. doi:10.1080/17475759. 2012.744341
  30. Putnam L., Wilson C. Communication strategies in organizational conflicts: Reliability and validity of a measurement. In M. Burgoon (ed.). Communication yearbook. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982, pp. 652—692.
  31. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965. 326 p.
  32. Schwartz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1992, no. 25 (1), pp. 1—65.
  33. Schwartz S.H., Cieciuch J., Vecchione M. et al. Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012. №103 (4). Р. 663—688.
  34. Skimina E., Cieciuch J., Schwartz S. H. et al. Testing the Circular Structure and Importance Hierarchy of Value States in Real-Time Behaviors [Electronic resource]. Journal of Research in Personality. Published online. 2018. URL: https://www. sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-research-in-personality (accessed 10.03.2018).
  35. Stephan W.G. Intergroup Anxiety: Theory, Research, and Practice. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 2014, no. 18(3), pp. 239—255.
  36. Thomas K.W., Kilmann R.H. Developing a forced-choice measure of conflict-handling behavior: The “mode” instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977, no. 37 (2), pp. 309— 325.
  37. Ting-Toomey S., Yee-Jung K.K., Shapiro R.B. et al. Ethnic/cultural identity salience and conflict styles in four US ethnic groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2000, no. 24 (1), pp. 47—81. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00023-1
  38. Ting-Toomey S. Applying Dimensional Values in Understanding Intercultural Communication. Communication Monographs, 2010, no. 77(2), pp. 169—180. doi:10.1080/03637751003790428
  39. Ting-Toomey S., Oetzel J.G. Managing Intercultural Conflict Effectively. SAGE Publications, 2001. 248 p.
  40. Tong Y., Chen G.-M. Intercultural Sensitivity and Conflict Management Styles in Cross-Cultural Organizational. Intercultural Communication Studies, 2008, no. 17(2), pp. 149—161.
  41. Torres C.V., Schwartz S.H., Nascimento T.G. The Refined Theory of Values: Associations with Behavior and Evidences of Discriminative and Predictive Validity. Psicologia USP, 2014, no. 27 (2), pp. 341—356. doi:10.1590/0103-656420150045
  42. Trawalter S., Adam E.K., Chase-Lansdale P.L., Richeson J.A. Concern about appearing prejudiced get under the skin: Stress responses to interracial contact in the moment and across time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012, no. 48, pp. 682—693. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.003
  43. Trawalter S., Richeson J.A., Shelton J.N. Predicting behavior during interracial interactions: A stress and coping approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2009, no. 13, pp. 243—268. doi:10.1177/1088868309345850
  44. Turner R.N., Crisp R.J., Lambert E. Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2007, no. 10, pp. 427—441.
  45. Worchel S. Culture’s role in conflict and conflict management: Some suggestions, many questions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2005, no. 29, pp. 739—757. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.08.011

Information About the Authors

Anastasia A. Batkhina, PhD in Psychology, Academic Director, Doctoral School of Psychology, HSE University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0397-296X, e-mail: batkhina.anastasia@gmail.com

Nadezhda M. Lebedeva, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Director of the Center for Socio-Cultural Research, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Employee of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2046-4529, e-mail: lebedhope@yandex.ru



Total: 2533
Previous month: 10
Current month: 21


Total: 795
Previous month: 9
Current month: 12