Components of value-semantic sphere of personality as predictors of migration intentions among the youth (on the example of Komsomolsk-on-Amur).

The article is devoted to the study of migration intentions among young people in Komsomolsk-on-Amur. The study tested two hypotheses: 1) differences between groups of young people with different migration activity will be manifested in the mismatch between values and their accessibility, as well as in the level of subjective well-being; 2) components of the value-semantic sphere are predictors of migration intentions among young people. The sample group included 130 subjects aged 16—25 years (mean age 23.1 years). To explore value-semantic sphere was used the methodology of E.B. Fantalova “level of correlation between “value” and “accessibility” in various spheres of life” and the Index of personal well-being. The results of the study showed that 26% of young people are not going to change their place of residence, 22% — are going to leave the city. Step-by-step regression analysis allowed us to identify explanatory models that predict the migration activity of young people. Subjective well-being is the most significant predictor of migration intentions (28% of variance). The second place is occupied by the sharpness of the mismatch between the importance of values and their subjective accessibility (26% of the variance).

1. Grigor’eva M.V., Shamionov R.M. Vremennye sootnoshenija sub#ektnyh i lichnostnyh projavlenij v adaptacionnom processe [Temporal correlations of subject and personal displays in adaptation process]. Izvestija Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Ivzestia of the Volgograd State PedagogicalUniversity], 2009, no. 9, pp. 127—130.
2. Zajonchkovskaja Zh.A. Migracii i demograficheskoe budushhee Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka [Migrations and the demographic future of Siberia and the Far East]. In Glezer O., Poljana P. (eds) Rossija i ee regiony v XX veke: territorija — rasselenie — migracii [Russia and its regions in the 20th century: territory — resettlement — migration]. Moscow: Publ. OGI, 2005, pp. 479—490.
3. Zajonchkovskaja Zh.A. Rossija: migracija v raznom masshtabe vremeni [Russia: Migration in Different Scale of Time]. Moscow: Centr izuchenija problem vynuzhdennoj migracii v SNG, 1999, pp. 106—126.
4. Zajonchkovskaja Zh.A., Nozdrina N.N. Migracionnyj opyt naselenija regional’nyh centrov Rossi (na primere social’nogo oprosa v 10 gorodah) [Migration experience of the population of the regional centers of Russia (on the example of social survey in 10 cities)]. Problemy prognozirovanija [Studies on Russian Economic Development], 2008, no. 4, pp. 98—111.
5. Kuznetsova S.A. Migration Attitudes as the Subject of Social Psychological Research. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2013. no. 4, pp. 34— 46. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
6. Kuznetsova S.A., Orekhova A.O. Features of Time Perspectives in High School Students in the Migration Mobility Region (on Example of Magadan) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru [Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru], 2015. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 56—68. doi:10.17759/psyedu.2015070106. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
7. Moiseenko V.M. Territorial’noe dvizhenie naselenija [Territorial movement of the population]. Moscow: Mysl’, 1985. 120 p.
8. Rossijskij statisticheskij ezhegodnik [Russian ststistical yearbook]. Moscow: Rossta, 2017. 686 p.
9. Sigareva E.P., Sivopljasova S. Yu. Nekotorye aspekty migracionnoj motivacii rossijskoj molodezhi [Some aspects of migration motivation of Russian youth]. Narodonaselenie [Population], 2014, no. 2, pp. 65—71.
10. Fantalova E.B. Diagnostika vnutrilichnostnogo konflikta [Diagnosis of internal conflict]. Moscow: Folium, 1997. 48 p.
11. Fantalova E.B. Diagnostics of values and internal conflicts in the general and clinical psychology [Elektronnyi resurs]. Klinicheskaia i spetsial’naia psikhologiia [Clinical Psychology and Special Education], 2013. Vol. 2, no. 1 (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.) URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyclin/2013/n1/58926.shtml (Accessed: 03.07.2018)
12. Homra A.U. Migracija naselenija: Voprosy teorii, metodiki issledovanija [Population Migration: Issues of Theory, Research Methods]. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1979. 148 p.
13. Shamionov R.M. Basic Beliefs and Cultural Attitudes as Predictors of Emotional and Psychological Well-Being in Urban and Rural Populations. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2015. Vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 109—122. doi:10.17759/ sps.2015060408. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
14. Shamionov R.M. O nekotoryh preobrazovanijah struktury sub#ektivnogo blagopoluchija lichnosti v raznyh uslovijah professional’noj socializacii [Subjective Well-being of Personality as a Subject of Socialexistence]. Mir psihologii [World of psychology], 2010, no. 1, pp. 237—249.
15. Jadov V.A. [i dr.] Samoreguljacija i prognozirovanie social’nogo povedenija lichnosti: Dispozicionnaja koncepcija [Self-regulation and prediction of social behavior: Dispositional concept]. Moscow: Publ. CSPiM, 2013. 376 p.
16. Jaremtchuk S.V. Sub#ektivnoe blagopoluchie kak komponent cennostno-smyslovoj sfery lichnosti [Subjective well-being as a part of self-regulation system based on personal values]. Psihologicheskii zhurnal [Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal], 2013, no. 5, pp. 85—95.
17. Ackah C., Medvedev D. Internal migration in Ghana: Determinants and welfare impacts. International Journal of Social Economics, 2012. Vol. 39 (10), pp. 764—784. doi: 10.1108/03068291211253386
18. Bell M., Charles-Edwards E. Measuring internal migration around the globe: A comparative analysis. Washington: The World Bank, D.C., 2014. 35 p.
19. Chindarkar N. Is subjective well—being of concern to potential migrants from Latin America? Social Indicators Research, 2014. Vol. 115 (1), pp. 159—182. doi: 10.1007/ s11205-012-0213-7
20. Creighton M.J. The role of aspirations in domestic and international migration. The Social Science Journal, 2013. Vol. 50 (1), pp. 79—88. doi: 10.1016/j. soscij.2012.07.006
21. Cui C., Geertman S., Hooimeijer P. The mediating effects of parental and peer pressure on the migration intentions of university graduates in Nanjing. Habitat International, 2016. Vol. 57, pp. 100—109. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.05.010
22. Deotti L., Estruch T. Addressing rural youth migration at its root causes: a conceptual framework. Rome: Rural Development FAO, 2016. 60 p.
23. Frieze I.H. et al. Psychological factors in migration and place attachment in Slovene students. Anthropos: Journal of Psychology, Philosophy, and for the Cooperation of Humanistic Studies, 2011. Vol. 3—4 (223—224), pp. 179—191.
24. Gavonel M.F. Patterns and drivers of internal migration among youth in Ethiopia, India, Peru and Vietnam [Elektronnyi resurs]. Oxford: Young Lives, 2017. URL: https:// www.younglives.org.uk/sites/www.younglives.org.uk/files/YL-WP169-Gavonel.pdf (Accessed: 03.07.2018)
25. International Migration Report 2017: Highlights. New York: United Nations, 2017. 30 p.
26. International wellbeing index: Translation made by Dr. Ekaterina Uglanova [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.acqol.com.au/uploads/pwi-a/pwi-a-russian.pdf (Accessed: 03.07.2018)
27. Li M. et al. Reasons for leaving home: Comparing predictors of wanting to migrate and travel in Croatian undergraduates. Migracijske Teme (Migration and Ethic Themes), 2012. Vol. 28 (1), pp. 7—27.
28. Manchin M., Orazbayev S. Social networks and the intention to migrate. Centro Studi Luca d’Agliano. Development Studies Working Paper, 2016. Vol. 409, pp. 1—50. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2974097
29. Nowok B. et al. Does migration make you happy? A longitudinal study of internal migration and subjective wellbeing. Environment and Planning A, 2013. Vol. 45 (4), pp. 986—1002. doi: 10.1068/a45287
30. Otrachshenko V., Popova O. Life (dis)satisfaction and the intention to migrate: Evidence fromCentral and Eastern Europe. The Journal of Socio—Economics, 2011. Vol. 48, pp. 40—49. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2013.09.008
31. Roman M., Vasilescu M.D. Explaining the migration intentions of Romanian youth: Are teenagers different? Romanian Statistical Review, 2016. Vol. 64 (4), pp. 69—86.