Evidence-Based Approach in Management: Evidence-Based Management and Policy

Objective. Review of the concepts of “evidence-based approach in management”, “evidence-based management”, and “evidence-based policy”. Systematization of factors that inhibit and contribute to the dissemination of evidence-based management practices in the social sphere. Identification of priority measures to support the development of an evidence-based approach in the management in the social sphere.Background. Executives in general, and also in the social sphere, are facing challenges of an increasing level of uncertainty, which brings difficulties to make reliable forecasts and make decisions with guaranteed results. At the same time, there is a systemic crisis of resources, requiring the choice of strategies and tactics that provide the highest level of performance. An additional challenge is the increasing amount of operations and the emerging need for managers to make quick management decisions. Against this background, the evidence-based approach acquires particular importance, based on the idea of the need to rely on the findings of research and expertise, providing managers with relevant data for choosing certain areas of action.Methodology. Literature review.Conclusions. The evidence-based approach in management is a range of practices with various severity of requirements, connected by the need for evidence-based and expert data for decision-making. Evidence-based management is a process of implementing an evidence-based approach within the framework of the activities of different level managers. Evidence-based policy is the implementation of evidence-based principles in making political decisions. Promotion of the evidence-based approach in management encounters several barriers such as assessment, used methodology, finance. However, some conditions can positively influence its promotion among practitioners: the involvement of senior managers, specialized training, the convergence of practitioners and researchers, and other factors. The funding of research and its accessibility remains critical.

1. Busygina N.P., Podushkina T.G., Stanilevskii V.V. Dokazatel’nyi podkhod v sotsial’noi sfere: osnovnye ponyatiya i printsipy, istoriya, perspektivy [Evidence-Based Approach in the Social Area: Basic Concepts and Guidelines, History, Prospects] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsial’nye nauki i detstvo = Social Sciences and Childhood, 2020. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8—26. DOI:10.17759/ssc.2020010101 (In Russ.).
2. Busygina N.P., Podushkina T.G., Freik N.V. Reestry praktik kak mekhanizm dokazatel’noi sotsial’noi politiki v sfere zashchity detstva: analiz mezhdunarodnogo opyta [Registers of Practices as an Evidence-Based Social Policy Mechanism for Child Welfare: An Analysis of International Experience] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsial’nye nauki i detstvo = Social Sciences and Childhood, 2021. Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7—23. DOI:10.17759/ssc.2021020101 (In Russ.).
3. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 06.07.2018 N 1375-r (red. ot 23.11.2020) «Ob utverzhdenii plana osnovnykh meropriyatii do 2020 goda, provodimykh v ramkakh Desyatiletiya detstva» [Order of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 06.07.2018 N 1375-r (ed. dated 11/23/2020) “On approval of the plan of main activities until 2020, held within the framework of the Decade of Childhood”] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Konsul’tant Plyus. 2021. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/ document/cons_doc_LAW_375249 (Accessed 27.10.2021). (In Russ.).
4. Standart dokazatel’nosti praktik v sfere detstva (Versiya № 2. 31.08.2018) [Standard of evidence of practices in the field of childhood (Version No. 2. 31.08.2018)] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Ozenka. Info. 2021. URL: http://ozenka.info/about/dokazatelniy_podhod/standart_dokazatelnosti_ praktik/402_file_2.pdf (Accessed 27.11.2021). (In Russ.).
5. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 29.05.2017 № 240 «Ob ob”yavlenii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii Desyatiletiya detstva» [Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 240 dated 29.05.2017 “On the announcement of the Decade of Childhood in the Russian Federation”] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Konsul’tant Plyus. 2021. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_ doc_LAW_375249 (Accessed 27.10.2021). (In Russ.).
6. Bellamy J.L., Mullen E.J., Satterfield J.M., Newhouse R.P., Ferguson M., Brownson R.C., Spring B. Implementing evidence-based practice education in social work: A transdisciplinary approach. Research on Social Work Practice, 2013. Vol. 24, pp. 426—436. DOI:10.1177/1049731513480528
7. Barends E., Rousseau D.M., Briner R.B. Evidence-Based Management: The Basic Principles. Amsterdam: Center for Evidence-Based Management, 2014. 20 p.
8. Cascio W.F. Evidence-Based Management and The Marketplace for Ideas. The Academy of Management Journal, 2007. Vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1009—1012. DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.27151942
9. Gold J. What Works Network: Five Years On [Elektronnyi resurs]. GOV.UK, 2018. 37 p. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ file/677478/6.4154_What_works_report_Final.pdf (Accessed 12.11.2021).
10. Head B. Toward More “Evidence-Informed” Policy Making? Public Administration Review, 2015. Vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 472—484. DOI:10.1111/puar.12475
11. Morago P. Evidence-based practice: from medicine to social work. European Journal of Social Work, 2006. Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 461—477. DOI:10.1080/13691450600958510
12. Ogbonnaya I.N., Martin J., Walsh C.R. Using the California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare as a Tool for Teaching Evidence-Based Practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 2018. Vol. 54, sup. 1, pp. 1—10. DOI:10.1080/10437797.2018.1434434
13. Pfeffer J., Sutton R.I. Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths, and Total Nonsense Profiting from Evidence-Based Management. Strategy and Leadership, 2006. Vol. 34(2), pp. 35—42. DOI:10.1108/10878570610652617
14. Rojas Y., Stenström N. The Effect of Organizational Factors on the Use of Evidence-based Practices among Middle Managers in Swedish Social Services. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 2019. Vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 32—46. DOI:10.1080/23303131. 2019.1683667
15. Rousseau D.M. Is There Such a Thing as “Evidence-Based Management”? Academy of Management Review, 2006. Vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 256—269. DOI:10.5465/amr.2006.20208679
16. Rundall T.G., Martelli P.F., Arroyo L., McCurdy R. The Informed Decisions Toolbox: Tools for Knowledge Transfer and Performance Improvement / Practitioner Application. Journal of Healthcare Management, 2007. Vol. 52, pp. 325—341. DOI:10.1097/00115514-200709000-00009
17. Rynes S.L., Trank C.Q., Lawson A.M., Ilies R. Behavioral Coursework in Business Education: Growing Evidence of a Legitimacy Crisis. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2003. Vol. 2, pp. 269—283. DOI:10.5465/amle.2003.10932135
18. Rynes S.L. Editor’s Afterword: Let’s Create A Tipping Point: What Academics and Practitioners can do, Alone and Together. Academy of Management Journal, 2007. Vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1046—1054. DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.27156169
19. Saari L.M. Bridging the Worlds. Academy of Management Journal, 2007. Vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1043—1045. DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.27156088
20. Sackett D.L., Richardson W.S., Rosenberg W., Haynes R.B. Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. Evidence-based medicine. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone, 1996. Vol. 312, pp. 71—72.
21. Sohrabi Z., Zarghi N. Evidence-Based Management: An Overview. Creative Education, 2015. Vol. 6, pp. 1776—1781. DOI:10.4236/ce.2015.616180
22. Udo C., Forsman H., Jensfelt M., Flink M. Research Use and Evidence-Based Practice Among Swedish Medical Social Workers: A Qualitative Study. Clinical Social Work Journal, 2019. Vol. 47, pp. 258—265. DOI:10.1007/s10615-018-0653-x
23. Van de Ven A.H., Johnson P.E. Knowledge for Theory and Practice. Academy of Management Review, 2006. Vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 802—821. DOI:10.5465/amr.2006.22527385
24. Walshe K., Rundall T.G. Evidence-based Management: From Theory to Practice in Health Care. The Milbank Quarterly, 2001. Vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 429—457. DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.00214