Vulnerability to Interpersonal Rejection Based on Appearance in Body Positive and Pro-Anorexic Online Communities

Objective. We aimed to analyze vulnerabilities to interpersonal rejection based on appearance in female participants of body positive and pro-anorexic online communities.
Background. The recent years has seen a rapid development of online communities focused on physical attractiveness. In the current paper two large segments of Russian-speaking online communities (body positive and pro-anorexic ones) are used to analyze the relationships between appearance-based rejection sensitivity, global self-esteem, personality traits, and body dissatisfaction.
Study design. The participants were surveyed in June–August 2020, online, in Google Forms. Invitations were posted in body positive and pro-anorexic online communities. Data analysis included Student’s t test, and correlation, regression and mediation analysis.
Participants. 562 adolescent girls and young women aged 15–30 (mean age – 21,06 ± 4,15; median – 21). Measures. The following measures were used: Appearance-based Rejection Sensitivity Scale (augmented by Social Comparisons based on Appearance survey), Body Image Questionnaire, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and Ten Item Personality Measure.
Results. Female participants of pro-anorexic online-communities displayed increased body dissatisfaction, appearance-based rejection sensitivity and neuroticism. They were more prone to explicitly compare their appearance with others and experienced more negative emotions in relation to this. Body positive communities’ participants reported more conscientiousness and emotional stability, and they made more implicit comparisons aimed at getting information about their appearance from social/interpersonal context. Global self-esteem and social comparisons partially mediated the relationship between appearance-based rejection sensitivity and body dissatisfaction.
Summary. Interpersonal sensitivity and self-esteem emerge as common risk factors of body dissatisfaction, whereas social comparisons (in terms of appearance) differentiate the participants of body positive and pro-anorexic communities.

1. Bodalev A.A., Stolin V.V. Obshchaya psikhodiagnostika [General psychological diagnostics]. Saint Petersburg: Rech', 2000. 438 p. (In Russ.).
2. Kiryukhina N.A., Pol'skaya N.A. Emotional dysregulation and body dissatisfaction in female population [Elektronnyi resurs]. Klinicheskaya i spetsial'naya psikhologiya = Clinical Psychology and Special Education, Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 126–147. DOI:10.17759/cpse.2021100308 (In Russ.).
3. Kononov A.N., Komissarova A.S. Sotsial'nye faktory vozniknoveniya rasstroistv pishchevogo povedeniya: kontent-analiz tekstov v seti internet [Research of factors of the origin of food disorders: Content analysis of text on the internet]. Vestnik TvGU Seriya: Pedagogika i psikhologiya = Herald of TvSU. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology, Vol. 1, no. 50, pp. 144–153. DOI:10.26456/vtpsyped/2020.1.144 (In Russ.).
4. Kornilova T.V., Chumakova M.A. Aprobatsiya kratkogo oprosnika Bol'shoi pyaterki (TIPI, KOBP) [Development of the Russian version of the brief Big Five questionnaire (TIPI)] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological Studies, Vol. 9, no. 46, pp. 5. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2016v9n46/1259-kornilova46.html (Accessed 18.01.2022). (In Russ.).
5. Labunskaya V.A. Attitude to appearance, its value and significance as factors of subjective well-being of young people. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 51–66. DOI:10.17759/sps.2019100304 (In Russ.).
6. Pol'skaya N.A., Tseitlina M.D., Yakubovskaya D.K. Chuvstvitel'nost' k otverzheniyu i psikhicheskoe zdorov'e [Rejection sensitivity and mental disorders]. , 2020. Vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 119–129. (In Russ.).
7. Pol'skaya N.A., Yakubovskaya D.K. Lichnostnye faktory uyazvimosti k mezhlichnostnomu otverzheniyu [Personal vulnerability factors to interpersonal rejection]. In Zvereva N.V., Roshchina I.F. (eds.). Sovremennye napravleniya diagnostiki v klinicheskoi (meditsinskoi) psikhologii = Modern directions of diagnostics in clinical (medical) psychology. Moscow: OOO Sam Poligrafist Publ., 2021, pp. 88–100. (In Russ.).
8. Razvalyaeva A.Yu., Pol'skaya N.A. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, Vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 118–143. DOI:10.17759/cpp.2020280407 (In Russ.).
9. Skugarevskii O.A., Sivukha S.V. Obraz sobstvennogo tela: razrabotka instrumenta dlya otsenki [Developing a scale to assess body image]. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal = Psychological Journal, Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 40–48. (In Russ.).
10. Afful A.A., Ricciardelli R. Shaping the online fat acceptance movement: Talking about body image and beauty standards. Journal of Gender Studies, 2015. Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 453–472. DOI:10.1080/09589236.2015.1028523
11. Allen M.S., Robson D.A., Laborde S. Normal variations in personality predict eating behavior, oral health, and partial syndrome bulimia nervosa in adolescent girls. Food Science & Nutrition, 2020. Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1423–1432. DOI:10.1002/fsn3.1425
12. Bardone-Cone A.M., Cass K.M. Investigating the impact of pro-anorexia websites: A pilot study. European Eating Disorders Review, 2006. Vol. 14, pp. 256–262. DOI:10.1002/erv.714
13. Baumeister R.F., Leary M.R. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 1995. Vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 497–529. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
14. Benford K., Swami V. Body image and personality among British men: Associations between the big five personality domains, drive for muscularity, and body appreciation. Body Image, 2014. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 454–457. DOI:10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.07.004
15. Caldeira P., Sofia A., Sander D.R. Representing diverse femininities on Instagram: A case study of the body-positive @effyourbeautystandards Instagram account. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 2017. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 321–337. DOI:10.1386/cjcs.9.2.321_1
16. Cohen R., Fardouly J., Newton-John T., Slater A. #BoPo on Instagram: An experimental investigation of the effects of viewing body positive content on young women’s mood and body image. New Media & Society, 2019. Vol. 21, 7, pp. 1546–1564. DOI:10.1177/1461444819826530
17. Cohen R., Irwin L., Newton-John T., Slater A. #bodypositivity: A content analysis of body positive accounts on Instagram. Body Image, 2019. Vol. 29, pp. 47–57. DOI:10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.02.007
18. Custers K., van der Bulck J. Viewership of pro-anorexia websites in seventh, ninth and eleventh graders. European Eating Disorders Review, 2009. Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 214–219. DOI:10.1002/erv.910
19. Cwynar-Horta J. The commodification of the body positive movement on Instagram. Stream: Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication, 2016. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 36–56. DOI:10.21810/strm.v8i2.203
20. Downey G., Feldman S.I. Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1327–1343. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327
21. Feldhege J., Moessner M., Bauer S. Detrimental effects of online pro–eating disorder communities on weight loss and desired weight: Longitudinal observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2021. Vol. 23, no. 10, p. e27153. DOI:10.2196/27153
22. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1954. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 117–140. DOI:10.1177/001872675400700202
23. Fredrickson B.L., Roberts T.A. Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1997. Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 173–206. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
24. Gerber J.P., Wheeler L., Suls J. A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on. Psychological Bulletin, 2018. Vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 177–197. DOI:10.1037/bul0000127
25. Gupta N.D., Etcoff N., Jaeger M. Beauty in mind: The effects of physical attractiveness on psychological well-being and distress. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2016. Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1313–1325. DOI:10.1007/s10902-015-9644-6
26. Harper K., Sperry S., Thompson J.K. Viewership of pro-eating disorder websites: Association with body image and eating disturbances. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2008. Vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 92–95. DOI:10.1002/eat.20408
27. Hayes A.F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. 3rd New York: The Guilford Press, 2022. 732 p.
28. Jett S., LaPorte D.J., Wanchisn J. Impact of exposure to pro-eating disorder websites on eating behaviour in college women. European Eating Disorders Review, 2010. Vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 410–416. DOI:10.1002/erv.1009
29. Karsay K., Knoll J., Matthes J. Sexualizing media use and self-objectification: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2018. Vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 9–28. DOI:10.1177/0361684317743019
30. Kleyn M., Clark J. Agency through bodily alterity: the case of "proanorexia" websites. Psychology in Society, 2009. Vol. 38, pp. 27–39.
31. Krautbauer K.H. A grounded theory analysis of the functions of pro-ana social media accounts. Master's Theses. Ypsilanti, MI: Eastern Michigan University, 2016. 73 p.
32. Mento C., Silvestri M.C., Muscatello M., Rizzo A., Celebre L., Praticò M., Zoccali R.A., Bruno A. Psychological impact of pro-anorexia and pro-eating disorder websites on adolescent females: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021. Vol. 18, no. 4, p. 2186. DOI:10.3390/ijerph18042186
33. O’Day E., Heimberg R. Social media use, social anxiety, and loneliness: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2021. Vol. 3, p. 100070. DOI:10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100070
34. Park L.E. Appearance-based rejection sensitivity: Implications for mental and physical health, affect, and motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2007. Vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 490–504. DOI:10.1177/0146167206296301
35. Park L.E., Pinkus R.T. Interpersonal effects of appearance-based rejection sensitivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 2009. Vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 602–612. DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.003
36. Runfola C.D., Von Holle A., Trace S.E., Brownley K.A., Hofmeier S.M., Gagne D.A., Bulik C.M. Body dissatisfaction in women across the lifespan: Results of the UNC- SELF and gender and body Image (GABI) studies. European Eating Disorders Review, 2013. Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 52–59. DOI:10.1002/erv.2201
37. Smart Richman L., Leary M.R. Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model. Psychological Review, 2009. Vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 365–383. DOI:10.1037/a0015250
38. Suls J., Martin R., Wheeler L. Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2002. Vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 159–163. DOI:10.1111/1467-8721.00191
39. Turton R., Cardi V., Treasure J., Hirsch C.R. Modifying a negative interpretation bias for ambiguous social scenarios that depict the risk of rejection in women with anorexia nervosa. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2018. Vol. 227, pp. 705–712. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.089
40. Tylka T.L., Wood-Barcalow N.L. What is and what is not positive body image? Conceptual foundations and construct definition. Body Image, 2015. Vol. 14, pp. 118–129. DOI:10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.04.001
41. Westwood H., Lawrence V., Fleming C., Tchanturia K. Exploration of friendship experiences, before and after illness onset in females with anorexia nervosa: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE, 2016. Vol. 11, no. 9, p. e0163528. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0163528
42. Williams S. Understanding anorexia nervosa: An online phenomenological approach. PhD Thesis. Edinburgh: Queen Margaret University, 2009. 316 p.
43. Williamson G., Karazsia B.T. The effect of functionality-focused and appearance-focused images of models of mixed body sizes on women's state-oriented body appreciation. Body Image, 2018. Vol. 24, pp. 95–101. DOI:10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.12.008
44. Wilson J.L., Peebles R., Hardy K.K., Litt I.F. Surfing for thinness: A pilot study of pro-eating disorder Web site usage in adolescents with eating disorders. Pediatrics, 2006. Vol. 118, no. 6, pp. e1635–e DOI:10.1542/peds.2006-1133