Ethno-Cultural Factors of Demand for Alternative Practices in the Field of Physical and Mental Health

Objective. Study aims to investigate the ethno-cultural factors of demand for alternative practices in the sphere of health and psychological well-being among Russian youth.
Background. The decision to seek help is critical to the health and psychological well-being of the individual and society. Turning to non-conventional practices (psychic, paranormal, etc.) to solve problems in the field of both physical and mental health and psychological well-being can be associated with potential risks.
Study design. Quantitative cross-sectional study of adolescents and youth in several Russian regions: Saint-Petersburg and Leningradskaya region, Irkutsk, Murmansk and Tomsk regions, Kamchatka and Krasnoyarsk regions, the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). Data collection was carried out in the form of an online survey in November-December 2020.
Participants. The study sample consisted of 1258 adolescents and young people aged 14 years and older, of which 671 are adolescents and young people who identify themselves as indigenous peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East of the Russian Federation. Young men constituted 33% of the sample, mean age – 22,1 years (min = 14, max = 35; SD = 6,26).
Measurements. The several scales for assessing the help-seeking and related attitudes towards alternative practices, self-assessment of mental health (HBSC scale). Descriptive statistics, contingency tables to assess differences by ethnicity and gender and a logistic regression model predicting intention to future use of the services were calculated.
Results. Young people's appeal to providers of alternative practices of help (magicians, fortune-tellers, psychics, etc.) has no ethno-cultural specifics. The youth of the indigenous peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East significantly more often than the youth of another ethnicity turn only to shamans, who are part of the unique spiritual culture of these ethnic groups but not to any other group of practitioners.
Conclusions. Asking for help from different representatives of alternative assistance is interconnected, which may be the result of "teenager experimentation" in different areas of life, or openness to new experience, including in relation to the search for different types of help. The second important factor of use of alternative services is the distrust of official medicine, which motivates people to use alternative types of health care (turning to shamans, fortune tellers, magicians, sorcerers, etc.).

1. Antonova N.A., Eritsyan K.Yu., Tsvetkova L.A. Sub"ektivnaya reprezentatsiya psikhicheskogo i somaticheskogo zdorov'ya podrostkov i molodezhi korennykh malochislennykh narodov Severa, Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka RF [Subjective representation of the mental and somatic health of adolescents and young people of the indigenous peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East of the Russian Federation]. Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena = Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities and Sciences, 2022, no. 203, pp. 39–5. DOI:10.33910/1992-6464-2022-203-39-54 (In Russ.).
2. Goryunov A.V., Khlopushin R.G. Rynok traditsionnoi meditsiny Sankt-Peterburga [Market of traditional medicine St. Petersburg]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noi antropologii = Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2005. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 179–185. (In Russ.).
3. Kozlov A.I., Kozlova M.A., Vershubskaya G.G., Shilov A.B. Zdorov'e korennogo naseleniya Severa Rossiiskoi Federatsii: na grani vekov i kul'tur [Health of the indigenous population of the North of the Russian Federation: on the verge of centuries and cultures]. Perm: OT i DO, 2013. 205 p. (In Russ.).
4. Krasheninnikova Yu.A. «Neformal'noe zdravookhranenie» v sovremennoi Rossii i faktory ego razvitiya (po materialam pilotnogo issledovaniya) [Elektronnyi resurs] [“Informal Healthcare” in Modern Russia and Its Developmental Factors – Evidence from a Pilot Study]. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya [Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology], Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 99–122. URL: https://mirros.hse.ru/article/view/4920 (Accessed 01.04.2023).
5. Kudashkin V.A. Izmeneniya dukhovnoi kul'tury u malochislennykh narodov Severa i Sibiri v 20 veke [Changes in the Spiritual Culture of the Indigenous Peoples of the North and Siberia in the 20th Century]. Problemy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Sibiri = Problems of socio-economic development of Siberia, 2011, no. 2, pp. 79–82. (In Russ.).
6. Lekhtsier V.L., Gotlib A.S., Finkel'shteĭn I.E. Meditsinskiĭ vybor khronicheskikh bol'nykh v krupnom rossiiskom gorode: situatsii, praktiki, faktory [Medical choice of chronic patients in a large Russian сity: Situations, practices, factors]. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal = Sociological Journal, 2019. Vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 78–98. DOI:10.19181/socjour.2019.25.2.6387 (In Russ.).
7. Mikhel' D.V. Sotsial'naya antropologiya meditsinskikh sistem: meditsinskaya antropologiya [Social Anthropology of Medical Systems: Medical Anthropology]. Saratov: New project, 2010. 80 p. (In Russ.).
8. Prokop'eva A.N. Rechnye lyudi: zhizn' na beregu r. Lena [River people: life on the banks of the Lena river]. Vestnik Severo-Vostochnogo federal'nogo universiteta im. M.K. Ammosova. Seriya «Nauki o Zhemle» = Bulletin of the North-Eastern Federal University. M.K. Ammosov. Earth Sciences series, 2018. Vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 23–29. (In Russ.).
9. Reshetnikov A.V. Sotsiologiya obyazatel'nogo meditsinskogo strakhovaniya (chast' II) [The sociology of mandatory medical insurance: Part II]. Sotsiologiya meditsiny = Sociology of medicine, 2013, no. 1, pp. 3–11. (In Russ.).
10. Strategiya VOZ v oblasti narodnoi meditsiny, 2014-2023 gg. [Elektronnyi resurs] [WHO strategy in the field of traditional medicine, 2014-2023]. WHO, 2013. URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/112501 (Accessed 16.02.2023).
11. Kharitonova V.I. Ot narodno-meditsinskikh traditsii k integrativnoi meditsine [From folk medicine traditions to integrative medicine]. Nauchnyi vestnik Yamalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga = Scientific Bulletin of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, 2012, no. 1, p. 40. (In Russ.).
12. Aarnio K., Lindeman M. Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles. Personality and individual differences, Vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1227–1236. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.009
13. Addis M.E., Mahalik J.R. Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American psychologist, Vol. 58, no. 1, p. 5. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.5
14. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211. DOI:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
15. Alzahrani A.S., Price M.J., Greenfield S.M., Paudyal V. Global prevalence and types of complementary and alternative medicines use amongst adults with diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of clinical pharmacology, Vol. 77, no. 9, pp. 1259–1274. DOI:10.1007/s00228-021-03097-x
16. Badakhsh M., Dastras M., Sarchahi Z., Doostkami M., Mir A., Bouya S. Complementary and alternative medicine therapies and COVID-19: a systematic review. Reviews on environmental health, 2021. Vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 443–450. DOI:1515/reveh-2021-0012
17. Bader C.D., Mencken F.C., Baker J.O. Paranormal America: Ghost Encounters, ufo Sightings, Bigfoot Hunts, and Other Curiosities in Religion and Culture. Journal of American History, Vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 927–928. DOI:10.1093/jahist/jar391
18. Berman J.D., Straus S.E. Implementing a research agenda for complementary and alternative medicine. Annual Review of Medicine, Vol. 55, pp. 239. DOI:10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.103657
19. Bishop F.L., Lewith G.T. Who uses CAM? A narrative review of demographic characteristics and health factors associated with CAM use. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 11–28. DOI:10.1093/ecam/nen023
20. Bishop F.L., Yardley L., Lewith G.T. A systematic review of beliefs involved in the use of complementary and alternative medicine. Journal of health psychology, Vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 851–867. DOI:10.1177/1359105307082447
21. Castro M., Burrows R., Wooffitt R. The paranormal is (still) normal: The sociological implications of a survey of paranormal experiences in Great Britain. Sociological research online, 2014. Vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 30–44. DOI:5153/sro.3355
22. Clarke T.C., Black L.I., Stussman B.J., Barnes P.M., Nahin R.L. Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002–2012 [Elektronnyi resurs]. National health statistics reports, Vol. 79, p. 1. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4573565/ (Accessed 10.02.2023).
23. Cornally N., McCarthy G. Help‐seeking behaviour: A concept analysis. International journal of nursing practice, Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 280–288. DOI:10.1111/j.1440-172X.2011.01936.x
24. Currie C., Inchley J., Molcho M., Lenzi M., Veselska Z., Wild F. Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study protocol: background, methodology and mandatory items for the 2013/14 survey. St Andrews: CAHRU, 2014. 217 p.
25. Drinkwater K.G., Dagnall N., Denovan A., Williams C. Paranormal belief, thinking style and delusion formation: a latent profile analysis of within-individual variations in experience-based paranormal facets. Frontiers in psychology, Vol. 12, p. 670959. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.670959
26. Eisenberg D.M., Davis R.B., Ettner S.L., Appel S., Wilkey S., Van Rompay M., Kessler R.C. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 280, no. 18, pp. 1569–1575. DOI:10.1001/jama.280.18.1569
27. Fischer F.H., Lewith G., Witt C.M., Linde K., von Ammon K., Cardini F., ... & Brinkhaus B. High prevalence but limited evidence in complementary and alternative medicine: guidelines for future research. BMC complementary and alternative medicine, Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–9. DOI:10.1186/1472-6882-14-46
28. Graham R.E., Ahn A.C., Davis R.B., O'Connor B.B., Eisenberg D.M., Phillips R.S. Use of complementary and alternative medical therapies among racial and ethnic minority adults: results from the 2002 National Health Interview Survey. Journal of the National Medical Association, 2005. Vol. 97, no. 4, p. 535.
29. Hall H.G., Griffiths D.L., McKenna L.G. The use of complementary and alternative medicine by pregnant women: a literature review. Midwifery, 2011. Vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 817–824. DOI:1016/j.midw.2010.08.007
30. Harnett J.E., McIntyre E., Steel A., Foley H., Sibbritt D., Adams J. Use of complementary medicine products: a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of 2019 Australian adults. BMJ open, 2019. Vol. 9, no. 7, pp. e024198. DOI:1136/bmjopen-2018-024198
31. Harris P.E., Cooper K.L., Relton C., Thomas K.J. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by the general population: a systematic review and update. International journal of clinical practice, 2012. Vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 924–939. DOI:1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02945.x
32. Hughes B.M. How should clinical psychologists approach complementary and alternative medicine? Empirical, epistemological, and ethical considerations. Clinical psychology review, 2008. Vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 657–675. DOI:1016/j.cpr.2007.09.005
33. Levin J., Taylor R.J., Chatters L.M. Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of spiritual healer use: findings from the National Survey of American Life. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2011. Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 63–70. DOI:1016/j.ctim.2011.02.001
34. Liddon L., Kingerlee R., Barry J.A. Gender differences in preferences for psychological treatment, coping strategies, and triggers to help‐seeking. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2018. Vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 42–58. DOI:1111/bjc.12147
35. Lindeman M. Biases in intuitive reasoning and belief in complementary and alternative medicine. Psychology and Health, 2011. Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 371–382. DOI:1080/08870440903440707
36. Molassiotis A., Fernadez-Ortega P., Pud D., Ozden G., Scott J.A., Panteli V., ... Patiraki E. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey. Annals of oncology, 2005. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 655–663. DOI:1093/annonc/mdi110
37. Mowen T.J., Heitkamp A., Boman J. Paranormal activity: Self-control theory and belief in the paranormal. Deviant Behavior, 2022. Vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 728–742. DOI:1080/01639625.2021.1915723
38. Quandt S.A., Verhoef M.J., Arcury T.A., Lewith G.T., Steinsbekk A., Kristoffersen A.E., ... Fønnebø V. Development of an international questionnaire to measure use of complementary and alternative medicine (I-CAM-Q). The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2009. Vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 331–339. DOI:1089/acm.2008.0521
39. Ray J., Chakrabarty D., Paul R., Som K. Prevalence of the use of complementary and alternative medicine in an eastern Indian population with emphasis on tribal/ethnic minority groups. Journal of Taibah University medical sciences, Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 384–389. DOI:10.1016/j.jtumed.2018.04.001
40. Rice T.W. Believe it or not: Religious and other paranormal beliefs in the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 2003. Vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 95–106. DOI:1111/1468-5906.00163
41. Slader C.A., Reddel H.K., Jenkins C.R., Armour C.L., Bosnic‐Anticevich S.Z. Complementary and alternative medicine use in asthma: who is using what? Respirology, 2006. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 373–387. DOI:1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00861.x
42. Stone A. Rational thinking and belief in psychic abilities: It depends on level of involvement. Psychological Reports, 2016. Vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 74–89. DOI:1177/0033294115625261
43. Tangkiatkumjai M., Boardman H., Walker D.M. Potential factors that influence usage of complementary and alternative medicine worldwide: a systematic review. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 2020. Vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–15. DOI:1186/s12906-020-03157-2
44. Thalbourne M.A. A glossary of terms used in parapsychology. Puente Publications, 2003. 176 p.
45. Urits I., Schwartz R.H., Orhurhu V., Maganty N.V., Reilly B.T., Patel P.M., ... Viswanath O. A comprehensive review of alternative therapies for the management of chronic pain patients: acupuncture, tai chi, osteopathic manipulative medicine, and chiropractic care. Advances in therapy, 2021. Vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 76–89. DOI:1007/s12325-020-01554-0