The Influence of Prolonged Stressful Situation on World Assumptions, Peculiarities of Thinking and Moral Decisions

Objective. The study of the influence of prolonged stressful situation on world assumptions, peculiarities of thinking and moral decisions.
Background. The pandemic situation can be considered as a model stressful situation. The assessment of its impact makes it possible to predict the consequences of society experiencing a high level of stress in a situation of danger and/or uncertainty.
Study design. The level of distress, moral decisions, world assumptions, and peculiarities of thinking before the pandemic and in the conditions of the pandemic were compared. Methods of variance analysis, the Kraskal-Wallace criterion, and correlation analysis were used.
Participants. "Moral dilemmas" N = 621 (23,4% of men), age – 33,7 ± 11,32; Constructive thinking questionnaire N = 700 (20,7% of men), age – 31,55 ± 9,7; Scale of basic beliefs N = 412 (18,2% of men), age – 35,6 ± 11,2.
Measurements. "Moral dilemmas", "World Assumptions Scale” (WAS), “Constructive Thinking Inventory” (CTI), Symptom Check List-90-Revised (SCL-90R).
Results. During the pandemic, the level of distress experienced is higher, the ability to distinguish between personal and "distant" violence is lower, and indicators of constructive thinking and emotional coping are lower. The belief in benevolence, justice of the world, the value of one's own self is reduced. All these changes are associated with a high level of distress.
Conclusions. The stressful situation led to a change in moral decisions. The change was not directly related to basic beliefs and thinking patterns and is a consequence of "emotional detachment" in stressful situation.

1. Ekimova V.I., Rozenova M.I., Litvinova A.V. [i dr.]. Travmatizatsiya strakhom: psikhologicheskie posledstviya pandemii COVID-19 [The Fear Traumatization: Psychological Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2021. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 27–38. DOI:10.17759/jmfp.2021100103 (In Russ.).
2. Enikolopov S.N., Medvedeva T.I., Boiko O.M. [i dr.]. Prinyatie moral'nykh reshenii vo vremya pandemii COVID-19 [Moral decision-making during COVID-19 pandemic]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14 = Moscow University Psychology Bulletin. Psikhologiya, 2020, no. 4, pp. 22–43. DOI:10.11621/vsp.2020.04.02 (In Russ.).
3. Kochetova Yu.A., Klimakova M.V. Issledovaniya psikhicheskogo sostoyaniya lyudei v usloviyakh pandemii COVID-19 [Psychological State Researches in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2021. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 48–56. DOI:10.17759/jmfp.2021100105 (In Russ.).
4. Lebedev S.V., Enikolopov S.N. Adaptatsiya metodik issledovaniya posttravmaticheskikh stressovykh rasstroistv [Adaptation of research methods for posttraumatic stress disorders]. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika = Psychological diagnostics, 2004. Vol. 3, pp. 19–38. (In Russ.).
5. Medvedeva T.I., Enikolopov S.N., Boiko O.M. [i dr.]. Moral'nye resheniya, osobennosti myshleniya i kopingi vo vremya pandemii [Moral decisions, peculiarities of thinking and coping during the pandemic]. Kochenovskie chteniya-2020. Psikhologiya i pravo v sovremennoi Rossii (Moskva, 11-13 noyabrya 2020 g.) [Kochenov readings-2020. Psychology and Law in Modern Russia]. Moscow: Publ. MGPPU, 2020, 40–42. (In Russ.).
6. Mosolov S.N. Dlitel'nye psikhicheskie narusheniya posle perenesennoi ostroi koronavirusnoi infektsii SARS-CoV-2 [Long-term psychiatric sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection]. Sovremennaya terapiya psikhicheskikh rasstroistv = Current Therapy of Mental Disorders, 2021, no. 3, pp. 2–23. DOI:10.21265/PSYPH.2021.31.25.001 (In Russ.).
7. Padun M.A., Kotel’nikova A.V. Psihicheskaya travma i kartina mira: Teoriya, empiriya, praktika [Mental trauma and the picture of the world: Theory, empiricism, practice]. Moscow: Publ. IP RAS, 2012. 206 p. (In Russ.).
8. Soldatova G.U. Praktikum po psikhodiagnostike i issledovaniyu tolerantnosti lichnosti. Moscow: MGU im. M. Lomonosova, 2003. 112 p.
9. Tarabrina N.V. Praktikum po psikhologii posttravmaticheskogo stressa [Workshop on the psychology of post-traumatic stress]. SPb: Piter, 2001. 272 p. (In Russ.).
10. Borhany H., Golbabaei S., Jameie M. et al. Moral Decision-Making in Healthcare and Medical Professions During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Trends in Psychology, 2023. Vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 210–230. DOI:10.1007/s43076-021-00118-7
11. Epstein S. CTI: Constructive Thinking Inventory: professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 2001. 59 p.
12. Fleming W.H. Complex Moral Injury: Shattered Moral Assumptions. J Relig Health, 2022. Vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 1022–1050. DOI:10.1007/s10943-022-01542-4
13. Greene J.D. Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends Cogn Sci., 2007. Vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 322–332. DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004
14. Greene J.D., Nystrom L.E., Engell A.D. et al. The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 2004. Vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 389–400. DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
15. Greene J.D., Sommerville R.B., Nystrom L.E. et al. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 2001. Vol. 293, no. 5537, pp. 2105–2108. DOI:10.1126/science.1062872
16. Guraya S.S., Menezes P., Lawrence I.N. et al. Evaluating the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the physicians' psychological health: A systematic scoping review. Front Med (Lausanne), 2023. Vol. 10, pp. 1071537. DOI:3389/fmed.2023.1071537
17. Janoff-Bulman R. Shattered assumptions: towards a new psychology of trauma. New York, Toronto: Free Press; Maxwell Macmillan Canada; Maxwell Macmillan International, 1992. 256 p.
18. Janoff-Bulman R. Rebuilding shattered assumptions after traumatic life events. In: Snyder C.R. (eds.). Coping: The psychology of what works. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 305–323.
19. Mahmud S., Mohsin M., Dewan M.N. et al. The global prevalence of depression, anxiety, stress, and insomnia among general population during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in Psychology, 2023. Vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 143– DOI:10.1007/s43076-021-00116-9
20. Mazza M., Attanasio M., Pino M.C. et al. Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study. Front Psychol., 2020. Vol. 11, pp. 588159. DOI:3389/fpsyg.2020.588159
21. Minervini G., Franco R., Marrapodi M.M. et al. The association between COVID-19 related anxiety, stress, depression, temporomandibular disorders, and headaches from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review. Brain Sciences, 2023. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 481. DOI:3390/brainsci13030481
22. Pancani L., Marinucci M., Aureli N. et al. Forced Social Isolation and Mental Health: A Study on 1,006 Italians Under COVID-19 Lockdown. Front Psychol., 2021. Vol. 12, pp. 663799. DOI:3389/fpsyg.2021.663799
23. Robinson E., Sutin A.R., Daly M. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. J Affect Disord, 2022. Vol. 296, pp. 567–576. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.098
24. Romero-Rivas C., Rodríguez-Cuadrado S. Moral decision-making and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2020. DOI:31234/osf.io/8whkg
25. Scheuer E., Epstein S. Constructive thinking, reactions to a laboratory stressor, and symptoms in everyday life. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 1997. Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 269–303. DOI:10.1080/10615809708249305
26. Schiffer A.A., O'Dea C.J., Saucier D.A. Moral decision-making and support for safety procedures amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Pers Individ Dif, 2021. Vol. 175, pp. 110714. DOI:1016/j.paid.2021.110714
27. Stacciarini J.M., Troccoli B.T. Occupational stress and constructive thinking: health and job satisfaction. J Adv Nurs, 2004. Vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 480–48 DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03022.x
28. Wang C., Pan R., Wan X. et al. Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020. Vol. 17, no. 5. DOI:10.3390/ijerph17051729
29. Wu T., Jia X., Shi H. et al. Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord, 2021. Vol. 281, pp. 91–98. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.117
30. Youssef F.F., Dookeeram K., Basdeo V. et al. Stress alters personal moral decision making. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2012. Vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 491–49 DOI:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.017