Skip to Main Content

Social Psychology and Society
2025. Vol. 16, no. 3, 79–98
doi:10.17759/sps.2025160305
ISSN: 2221-1527 / 2311-7052 (online)

Characteristics of family relations of women entrepreneurs in small family business

 
Audio is AI-generated
33

, ,

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
Podcast
GS
Information
in Google Scholar
Metrics

Abstract

Context and relevance. Women entrepreneurs contribute significantly to the economic development of the country. In Russian Federation, 40,2% of the total number of small business entities are managed by women. Research evidence that psychological characteristics of family relationships and business efficiency are interconnected. Women entrepreneurs are forced to balance between family roles (spouse, mother) and the role of business manager, which often leads to conflicts.
Objective. To study the characteristics of family relations of women entrepreneurs in the field of small family business.
Hypotheses. 1. Women entrepreneurs have higher rates of family system adaptation in comparison to male entrepreneurs. 2. Women entrepreneurs have a gap between real and ideal family system. 3. The ideal family system compared to the real one in the women entrepreneurs’ perceptions implies a lower adaptability scale.
Methods and materials. The study involved 129 Russian entrepreneurs (51,2% men, 48,8% women). Russian-language version of Olson’s Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale III Questionnaire (FACES–3) was used for data collection. Authors also used brief demographic questionnaire to study the formal characteristics of respondents, their families and businesses. Statistical processing was performed using The Mann–Whitney U-test, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Cohen's d.
Results. Women entrepreneurs have higher scores of adaptability in family relationships than men entrepreneurs. The discrepancy between the real and ideal family system was revealed for women and men sample. Only the cohesion indicators have a significant difference and sufficient force of effect.
Conclusion. Families of women entrepreneurs tend to be more chaotic, with roles unbalanced. The ideal family system of entrepreneurs implies a rise in cohesion that correspond to entrepreneurs’ desire of greater emotional bond between family members.

General Information

Keywords: family relationship, family cohesion, family flexibility, women entrepreneurs

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2025160305

Acknowledgements. We are grateful to the families of entrepreneurs who participated in this research and kindly took their time to disclose some aspects of their family life.

Supplemental data. Datasets can be requested from the author (J.S. Murzina).

Received 29.07.2024

Revised 23.05.2025

Accepted

Published

For citation: Murzina, J.S., Rusyaeva, I.A., Zarubko, E.Y. (2025). Characteristics of family relations of women entrepreneurs in small family business. Social Psychology and Society, 16(3), 79–98. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2025160305

© Murzina J.S., Rusyaeva I.A., Zarubko E.Y., 2025

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Podcast

 

References

  1. Берсирова, А.К. (2023). Сплоченность как фактор позитивных отношений в семье в условиях неопределенности: представления молодых людей. Инновационная наука: Психология. Педагогика. Дефектология, 6(4), 10— https://doi.org/10.23947/2658-7165-2Q23-6-4-10-16
    Bersirova, A.K. (2023). Cohesion as a Factor of Positive Family Relations in Conditions of Uncertainty: Young People's Ideas. Innovative science: Psychology. Pedagogy. Defectology, 6(4), 10—16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23947/2658-7165-2Q23-6-4-10-16
  2. Васягина, Н.Н., Тактуева, Ю.Г. (2023). Особенности внутрисемейных взаимоотношений у подростков с саморазрушающим поведением. Педагогическое образование в России, 6, 249—
    Vasyagina, N.N., Taktueva, Yu.G. (2023). Features of Intra-family Relationships in Adolescents with Self-destructive Behavior. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 6, 249—255. (In Russ.).
  3. Вахитова, З.З., Калиева, Э.Р. (2009). Психологические особенности семей, владеющих общим бизнесом. Вестник Тюменского государственного университета, 5, 142—
    Vakhitova, Z.Z., Kalieva, E.R. (2009). Family Business Owner's Psychological Features. Tyumen State University Herald, 5, 142—148. (In Russ.).
  4. Золотарев, С.Ю. (2014). Апробирование циркулярной модели семьи Олсона в российских условиях и проверка применимости норм теста FACES-3. Вестник Новосибирского государственного университета. Серия: Психология, 8(2), 125—
    Zolotarev, S.Ju. (2014). Testing the Olson circular family model in Russian conditions and checking the applicability of the FACES-3 test norms. Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Psychology, 8(2), 125—128. (In Russ.).
  5. Карпушкин, А.М., Овчинников, А.А., Климова, И.Ю. (2022). Роль дисфункциональной семьи в формировании психопатологического профиля личности пациентов с соматизированным расстройством. Сибирский вестник психиатрии и наркологии, 1(114), 65— https://doi.org/10.26617/1810-3111-2022-%201(114)-65-71
    Karpushkin, A.M., Ovchinnikov, A.A., Klimova, I.Ju. (2022). The role of a dysfunctional family in the formation of a psychopathological profile of the personality of patients with somatization disorder. Siberian Bulletin of Psychiatry and Narcology, 1(114), 65–71. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26617/1810-3111-2022-%201(114)-65-71
  6. Левкович, В.П. (2004). Взаимоотношения супругов в семьях предпринимателей. Психологический журнал, 25(5), 24—
    Levkovich, V.P. (2004). Relationships in Employers' Married Couples. Psychological journal, 25(5), 24—31. (In Russ.).
  7. Мельчехина, И.В., Самарина, А.С. (2023). Психологическая близость членов семьи как фактор сплочения семьи. В: Материалы международной научно-практической конференции «Молодежь Сибири – науке России», 2 (с. 29—32). Красноярск: Сибирский институт бизнеса, управления и психологии.
    Mel'chjohina, I.V., Samarina, A.S. (2023). Psychological closeness of family members as a factor of family cohesion. In: Materials of the international scientific and practical conference “Youth of Siberia – Science of Russia”, 2 (pp. 29—32). Krasnojarsk: Sibirskij institut biznesa, upravlenija i psihologii. (In Russ.).
  8. Мерзлякова, С.В., Каюмова, Е.П. (2024). Семейная адаптация как предиктор семейного самоопределения студентов цифрового поколения. Образование и наука, 26(3), 123— http://dx.doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-3-123-148
    Merzlyakova, S.V., Kayumova, E.P. (2024). Family Adaptation as a Predictor of Family Self-determination of Digital Generation Students. The Education and Science Journal, 26(3), 123—148. (In Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-3-123-148
  9. Митина, Г.В., Мендель, О.П., Шаяхметова, Э.Ш. (2023). Влияние семейной сплоченности и гибкости на показатели эмоционального интеллекта подростков. Проблемы современного педагогического образования, 81-1, 332—
    Mitina, G.V., Mendel', O.P., Shayakhmetova, E.Sh. (2023). A Study of Family Cohesion and Flexibility in Adolescent Emotional Intelligence. Problems of modern pedagogical education, 81-1, 332—335. (In Russ.).
  10. Складан, В.В., Бутенко, В.Н. (2022). Влияние уровня семейной адаптации и сплоченности на психологическое благополучие и перфекционизм академически успешных подростков. В: Материалы международной научно-практической конференции «Молодежь Сибири – науке России», 2 (с. 155—158). Красноярск: Сибирский институт бизнеса, управления и психологии.
    Skladan, V.V., Butenko, V.N. (2022). The influence of the level of family adaptation and cohesion on the psychological well-being and perfectionism of academically successful adolescents. In: Materials of the international scientific and practical conference “Youth of Siberia – Science of Russia”, 2 (pp. 155—158). Krasnojarsk: Sibirskij institut biznesa, upravlenija i psihologii. (In Russ.).
  11. Солынин, Н.Э., Цветкова, Е.Н. (2024). Особенности толерантности к неопределенности в семьях с разным стажем супружества. Проблемы современного педагогического образования, 84–1, 483—486.
    Solynin, N.E., Tsvetkova, E.N. (2024). Features of Tolerance to Uncertainty in Families with Different Lengths of Marriage. Problems of modern pedagogical education, 84–1, 483—486.
  12. Фофанова, К.В., Капусткина, К.Г. (2022). Влияние опыта жизни в родительской семье на представления молодежи о своих будущих семейных отношениях. Социальные нормы и практики, 1, 54— https://doi.org/10.24412/2713-1033-2022-1-54-64
    Fofanova, K.V., Kapustkina, K.G. (2022). Influence of the Experience of Life in the Parental Family on the Ideas of Young People About Their Future. Social Norms and Practices, 1, 54—64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2713-1033-2022-1-54-64
  13. Эйдемиллер, Э.Г., Добряков, И.В., Никольская, И.М. (2006). Семейный диагноз и семейная психотерапия. CПб: Речь.
    Eidemiller, E.G., Dobryakov, I.V., Nikol'skaya, I.M. (2006). Family diagnosis and family psychotherapy. Saint-Petersburg: Rech. (In Russ.).
  14. Achtenhagen, L., Welter, F. (2003). Female entrepreneurship in Germany. In: J. Butler (Ed.), New Perspectives on Women Entrepreneurs (pp. 71—100). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
  15. Baughn, C., Chua, B.-, Neupert, K. (2006). The Normative Context for Women's Participation in Entrepreneurship: A Multicountry Study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 687—708.
  16. Bullough, A., Guelich, U., Manolova, T.S., Schjoedt, L. (2022). Women’s entrepreneurship and culture: gender role expectations and identities, societal culture, and the entrepreneurial environment. Small Business Economics, 58(2), 985— https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00429-6
  17. Combs, J.G., Jaskiewicz, P., Rau, S.B., Agrawal, R. (2021). Inheriting the legacy but not the business: When and where do family nonsuccessors become entrepreneurial? Journal of Small Business Management, 61(4), 1961— https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1883038
  18. Cooklin, A.R., Westrupp, E., Strazdins, L., Giallo, R., Martin, A., Nicholson, J.M. (2015). Mothers' work-family conflict and enrichment: Associations with parenting quality and couple relationship. Child: Care, Health and Development, 41(2), 266— http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cch.12137
  19. Coronel-Pangol, K., Paule-Vianez, J., Orden-Cruz, C. (2024). Conventional or alternative financing to promote entrepreneurship? An analysis of female and male entrepreneurship in developed and developing countries. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 20(1), 163— http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00906-w
  20. Danes, S.M., Lee, J., Stafford, K., Heck, R.K.Z. (2008). The effects of ethnicity, families and culture on entrepreneurial experience: an extension of sustainable family business theory. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 13(3), 229— http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1084946708001010
  21. De Clercq, D., Kaciak, E., Thongpapanl, N. (2022). Work-to-family conflict and firm performance of women entrepreneurs: Roles of work-related emotional exhaustion and competitive hostility. International Small Business Journal, 40(3), 364— http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02662426211011405
  22. Domańska, A., Gryglicka, A., Martyniuk, O., Więcek-Janka, E., Zajkowski, R. (2023). The state of the art in sustainability of Central-Eastern European family firms: Systematic literature review. International Entrepreneurship Review, 9(3), 21— https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2023.0903.02
  23. Dvouletý, O., Orel, M., Procházka, D.A. (2025). European family business owners: what factors affect their job satisfaction? Journal of Family Business Management, 15(1), 10— https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-12-2023-0303
  24. Ernst Kossek, E., Ozeki, C. (1998). Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior–human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 139— https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.139
  25. Ferguson, F.E., Durup, M.J.R. (1998). Work-family conflict and entrepreneurial women: A literature review. Journal of small business & entrepreneurship, 15(1), 30— http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08276331.1998.10593278
  26. Ferrari, F. (2019). Does too much love hinder innovation? Family involvement and firms’ innovativeness in family-owned Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs). European Journal of Family Business, 9(2), 115— http://dx.doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v9i2.5388
  27. Glowka, G., Kallmünzer, A., Zehrer, A. (2021). Enterprise risk management in small and medium family enterprises: the role of family involvement and CEO tenure. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(3), 1213— http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00682-x
  28. Goel, S., Xiu, L., Hanson, S., Jones, R.J. (2019) HR flexibility in family firms: Integrating family functioning and family business leadership. Organization Management Journal, 16(4), 311— http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2019.1681254
  29. Jamadin, N., Mohamad, S., Syarkawi, Z., Noordin, F. (2015). Work-family conflict and stress: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(2), 309—
  30. Langowitz, N.S., Morgan, C. (2003). Women entrepreneurs. In: J. Butler (Ed.), New Perspectives on Women Entrepreneurs ( 101—119). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
  31. Leach, P., Mars, V.B. (2016). Family enterprises: The essentials. London: Profile Books.
  32. Litz, R.A. (2008). Two sides of a one‐sided phenomenon: Conceptualizing the family business and business family as a Möbius strip. Family Business Review, 21(3), 217— http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08944865080210030104
  33. Long, Z., Buzzanell, P.M. (2022). Constituting Intersectional Politics of Reinscription: Women Entrepreneurs’ Resistance Practices in China, Denmark, and the United States. Management Communication, 36(2), 207— https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189211030246
  34. Michael‐Tsabari, N., Lavee, Y. (2012). Too close and too rigid: Applying the circumplex model of family systems to first‐generation family firms. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38, 105— https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00302.x
  35. Neto, M.J., Sequeira, J., Massano-Cardoso, I., Chambel, M.J. (2021). Flexibility, cohesion and family satisfaction: The impact of conflict between work and family. Journal of Family Therapy, 43(4), 773— http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12322
  36. Olson, D.H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 144— http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00144
  37. Olson, D.H., Waldvogel, L., Schlieff, M. (2019). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: an update. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 11(2), 199— http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12331
  38. Pleck, J.H., Staines, G.L., Lang, L. (1980). Conflicts between work and family life. Monthly Labor Review, 103, 29—
  39. Powell, G.N., Eddleston, K.A. (2013). Linking Family-to-business Enrichment and Support to Entrepreneurial Success: Do Female and Male Entrepreneurs Experience Different Outcomes? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 261— http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.02.007
  40. Rodríguez-García, M., González-Cruz, T. (2024). Is “Something Else” Needed Before Establishing a Family Council? The Role of Communication in Business Familiesole of communication within business families. European Journal of Family Business, 14(1), 98— http://dx.doi.org/10.24310/ejfb.14.1.2024.19325
  41. Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1—
  42. Singelis, T.M., Triandis, H.C., Bhawuk, D.P., Gelfand, M.J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-cultural research, 29(3), 240— http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106939719502900302
  43. Stead, V. (2017). Belonging and women entrepreneurs: Women’s navigation of gendered assumptions in entrepreneurial practice. International Small Business Journal, 35(1), 61— http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266242615594413
  44. Sunnatillo, I., Behzod, G. (2024). Through Family Business and Small Business Activities Poverty Abbreviation. European journal of business startups and open society, 4(3), 278—
  45. Tucker, J. (2011). Keeping the business in the family and the family in business: “What is the legacy?”. Journal of Family Business Management, 1(1), 65— http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/20436231111122290
  46. Turkdogan, T., Duru, E., Balkis, M. (2019). Circumplex model of family functioning in Turkish culture: Western family systems model in a Eurasian country. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 50(2), 183— http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.50.2.005
  47. Ugli, B.K.F. (2024). The impacting factors on small business growth. Frontline Marketing, Management and Economics Journal, 4(1), 24— http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/marketing-fmmej-04-01-04
  48. Welsh, D.H., Botero, I.C., Kaciak, E., Kopaničová, J. (2021). Family emotional support in the transformation of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Research, 137, 444— http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.059
  49. Welsh, D.H., Llanos-Contreras, O., Alonso-Dos-Santos, M., Kaciak, E. (2021). How much do network support and managerial skills affect women’s entrepreneurial success? The overlooked role of country economic development. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 33(3–4), 287— http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2021.1872939
  50. Woldie, A., Adersua, A. (2004). Female entrepreneurs in a transitional economy: Businesswomen in Nigeria. International Journal of Social Economics, 31(1/2), 78— http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03068290410515439
  51. Zachary, R.K. (2011). The importance of the family system in family business. Journal of Family Business Management, 1(1), 26— https://doi.org/10.1108/20436231111122263

Information About the Authors

Julia . Murzina, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Associate Professor, Department of General and Social Psychology, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8616-4422, e-mail: y.s.murzina@utmn.ru

Irina A. Rusyaeva, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Associate Professor, Department of General and Social Psychology, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2196-5536, e-mail: irinagefel@yandex.ru

Elena Y. Zarubko, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Associate Professor, Department of General and Social Psychology, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0174-1105, e-mail: e.y.zarubko@utmn.ru

Contribution of the authors

Julia S. Murzina — ideas; writing and design of the manuscript; planning of the research; data collection and analysis; control over the research.
Irina A. Rusyaeva — writing and design of the manuscript; analysis of scientific sources.
Elena Y. Zarubko — annotation; writing and design of the manuscript; analysis of scientific sources; application of statistical, mathematical methods for data analysis; visualization of research results.

All authors participated in the discussion of the results and approved the final text of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent for participation in this study was obtained from the participants.

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 133
Previous month: 58
Current month: 15

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 33
Previous month: 10
Current month: 2

 Total

Whole time: 166
Previous month: 68
Current month: 17