Towards the Psychology of the Possible: the Anthropological, the Deterministic, the Axiological and the Existential Context

This paper considers the role of the category of the possible in four contexts. In the anthropological context the idea of the possible is viewed as a specific feature of human psychology, unlike the minds of other living species. The human being is conceived as a possible, rather than factual, being, as a possibility of oneself. In the context of the vol. of determinism one’s orientation toward the possible is treated as a mechanism of motivation and activity regulation, based on reflective awareness and goal setting. Our consciousness singles out those specific possibilities from the domain of the possible which possess a definite value, attractiveness or meaning for us, and due to this they are considered as potential options for action. Actually, only few are embodied in one’s activity after passing one more selection: they are accepted as the ought, the goals, for the implementation of which we accept responsibility. In the axiological aspect, possibilities appear as the good, or value, a component of quality of life and well-being. Empirical data are presented on the associations between the idea of the existing possibilities and numerous indicators of subjective and psychological well-being. Finally, in the existential context, possibilities appear as existential options, consciously chosen and implemented by the person. An action in the realm of the possible suggests the acceptance of responsibility, self-reflection and the conscious acceptance of the price. While switching on the reflective self-awareness, we become aware of the available possibilities, weight up and reflect on the consequences which the given actions may entail, and on the price we shall have to pay for these or those choices, accept the risk and the responsibility for the choice. Freedom appears in this context as conscious opportunity. The realm of the possible is thus the realm of our responsibility and our freedom.

Engels, F. (1966). Anti-Dühring. Moscow, Politizdat Publ. (In Russian)

Epstein, M. N. (2001). Philosophy of the possible. St Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ. (In Russian)

Epstein, M. N. (2004). Space sign: about the future of the humanities. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ. (In Russian)

Frankl, V. (1990). Man in search of meaning. Moscow, Progress Publ. (In Russian)

Frankl, V. (2022). An unconditional person. Moscow, Smysl Publ. (In Russian)

Fromm, E. (1992). The human soul. Moscow, Respublika Publ. (In Russian)

Hazlitt, W. (1996). Vanity of vanities: five hundred years of English aphorism, comp., foreword. and transl. by A. Livergant. Moscow, Russiko Publ.; Trud newspaper office. (In Russian)

Hehkauzen, H. (1986). Motivation and activity: in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ. (In Russian)

Ivanchenko, G. V. (2008). Representations of graduate students about the possible: regional and gender differences. Psychology. HSE Journal, 5 (1), 32–63. (In Russian)

Leontiev, D. A. (1999). The psychology of meaning. Moscow, Smysl Publ. (In Russian)

Leontiev, D. A. (2001). On the subject of existential psychology. In: Leontiev D. A., Mazur E. S., Sosland A. I. (eds). The 1st All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference on Existential Psychology (pp. 3–6). Moscow, Smysl Publ. (In Russian)

Leontiev, D. A. (2009). Psychology as a Humanitarian Science: From the Discipline of the Necessary to the “Flowering Complexity” of the Possible. In: Zhuravlev A. V., Martsinkovskaya T. D., Yurevich A. V. (eds). Progress of Psychology: Criteria and Signs (pp. 95–110). Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Press. (In Russian)

Leontiev, D. A. (2008). Causality and explanation in personality psychology: from the necessary to the possible. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, V, XVII, 3, 27–142. (In Russian)

Leontiev, D. A. (2011). New guidelines for understanding personality in psychology: from the necessary to the possible. Questions of Psychology, 1, 3–27. (In Russian)

Leontiev, D. A. (2013). On some aspects of the problem of “culture and personality”. Cultural-historical psychology, 1, 22–30. (In Russian)

Leontiev, D. A. The end of immanence and the prospect of the possible. In: Belkin G. L. (ed.). The place and role of humanism in the future civilization (pp. 174–185). Moscow, Lenand Publ. (In Russian)

Leontiev, D. (2020). Facets of Possibility / Homo scriptor. In: Lipovetsky M. (ed.). Collection of articles and materials in honor of the 70th anniversary of M. Epstein (pp. 384–404). Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ. (In Russian)

Mamardashvili, M. K. (1992). As I understand philosophy. Moscow, Progress Publ. (In Russian)

Mamardashvili, M. K. (1995). Lectures on Proust (psychological topology of the path) . Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ. (In Russian)

Mamardashvili, M. K. (1997). Psychological topology of the path. Moscow, RKhGI Press. (In Russian)

Veenhoven, R. (2007). Quality-of-life research. In: Bryant C. D., Peck D. L. (eds). 21st Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook, vol. 2 (pp. 54–62). Thousand Oaks, Sage.

Veenhoven, R. (2012). Happiness, also known as “Life Satisfaction” and “Subjective Well-Being”. In:

Yalom, I. (1999). Existential psychotherapy. Moscow, NF “Klass” Publ. (In Russian)

Znakov, V. V. (2020). The Psychology of the Possible: A New Direction for the Study of Understanding. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Press. (In Russian)